Laserfiche WebLink
211 Mr. Matthew Anderson, Anderson Law Group, PLLC, 1010 Dale Street North, <br />212 Attorney representing residents of Roseville that live on McCarron Boulevard. He <br />213 indicated he wanted to talk about the Tamarack Trail Segment. He made a short <br />214 presentation to the Commission about the residents' opposition to the proposed <br />215 path. <br />216 <br />217 Chair Wozniak thanked Mr. Anderson for the presentation. <br />218 <br />219 Member Ficek asked if the homes have driveways on the McCarron's side or is this <br />220 their only access to their garages. <br />221 <br />222 Mr. Anderson was not sure, but he thought they all had McCarron's facing <br />223 driveways. There is one homeowner that has lived in this area since before <br />224 Roseville was incorporated and his first garage was the one in the back which he <br />225 has been using consistently all of the years he has lived there. He noted there are a <br />226 few properties he represent where the only way to access the back of their property <br />227 is from Wagner Street. <br />228 <br />229 Chair Wozniak asked what environmental harm Mr. Anderson is asserting that the <br />230 pathway would cause that is not already present in the current land use. <br />231 <br />232 Mr. Anderson explained when listening to the description of what goes into a <br />233 pathway with at least six inches of base and then on top of that another two to three <br />234 inches of asphalt and at least at eight feet wide, the City is filling a wetland and the <br />235 City is losing wetland at a rapid pace as he showed in his presentation. He indicated <br />236 the wetland is a thriving environment that the homeowners have respected and <br />237 driven on the dirt road but have not dug anything up and replaced it with outside <br />238 vegetation or class five rather than the native soil that belongs there. <br />239 <br />240 Chair Wozniak asked if the proposed pathway then would not, essentially follow <br />241 the current path taken by the homeowners. <br />242 <br />243 Mr. Anderson explained when looking at the map, he believed the proposal is to go <br />244 right over those tracks, but he was not certain. The plan would still have to dig up <br />245 what is there and replace it with class five rather than native soil and then cut back <br />246 whatever vegetation is within the eight feet wide area <br />247 <br />248 Member Misra asked who is maintaining the road currently. <br />249 <br />250 Mr. Anderson indicated no one is maintaining it. The homeowners who use the <br />251 road are making sure it does not fall into total disrepair. He believed someone <br />252 mows it once a year. He noted the City does not plow it and he did not think the <br />253 City mowed it. It was his understanding the homeowners have maintained that <br />254 stretch to be able to get a truck through there. In the winter, the road is rarely used. <br />255 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />