My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-5-4_PR_Comm_Min
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-5-4_PR_Comm_Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2021 7:17:33 PM
Creation date
6/1/2021 7:17:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Commission reviewed location maps ofthe parcel and the proposed site plan for the <br />development which would include a proposedsidewalk along Eustis. This parcel is located in <br />constellation J. There has been a long standing and strong desire for additional park and recreation <br />opportunities in this area of the city. <br />The project qualifies for Park Dedication. The proposal summary for Midland Legacy Estates <br />includes: <br /> Total Acreage = 6.1 <br /> 11 new lots (10 new) <br /> Cash Amount: $42,500 ($4,250 per unit X 10) <br /> Land Amount: .61 Acres <br />Staff noted that a similar plat proposal on this same property was reviewed by the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission in May and June of last year. For that proposal, the Commission made a <br />recommendation to accept useable parkland somewhere along County Rd B, and specified an area <br />on the south and southwest side of the development as a preferred location. That overall proposal <br />ultimately was not approved by the City Council. On this new proposal, the developer focused on the <br />Commissionsprevious parkland dedication recommendation for useable parkland on the south side <br />of the parcel.The developer has stated that the proposed land dedication will be turned over to the <br />city as useable parkland that is 95% flat and seeded. Additionally, the developer has committed to <br />protecting the three large existing oak trees on the east side of the current driveway which would <br />allow for existing tree cover to the new park space. <br />Chair Hoag reminded everyone that the role of the Commission is not to scrutinize the development <br />but to recommend land or cash to the City Council to satisfy Park Dedication. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed the development location in order to orientate themselves with the exact <br />location of the parcel. They also discussed what a .61 size park could potentially look like. <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss asked if there will be trail connections as part of this development. Staff <br />responded that pathways would be outside the scope of Park Dedication. However, it is staffs <br />understanding that the developer has the intention to create pathways as part of the Pathway Master <br />Plan along the south and west side of the parcel. <br /> <br />The Commission looked at pictures and discussed the large oak and maple trees that the developer <br />has proposed to save as part of the parkland. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baggenstoss thanked the developer for bringing back a creative proposal that <br />addressed the Commissions requests that were made in the previous park dedication <br />recommendation. <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.