My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_07-27_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2021
>
2021_07-27_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2021 3:57:29 PM
Creation date
8/2/2021 3:54:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/27/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment D <br />Excerpt from <br />Roseville Public Works, Environment <br />and Transportation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 6:30 p.m. <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br />Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13.D. 021, Public Works, Environment <br />and Transportation Commission members, City Staff, and members of the <br />public participated in this meeting electronically due to the <br />COVID-19 pandemic. <br />8. Proposed Updates to the Pathways Master Plan <br />Mr. Freihammer made a presentation to the Commission on the Pathways Master <br />Plan update. <br />Member Cicha indicated regarding the ranking system, connecting to the transit <br />system it is showing based off of 1 to 3 rating, but he saw numbers higher than 3. <br />He wanted to be sure that they are taking connections into transit and evaluating <br />that very highly with what paths they think they should be preferring because he <br />thought it was pretty well understood that those that are taking transit are walking <br />there. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained he will have to take a look at that criteria He did not <br />look too much at the table but that was a big need. A lot of times when they get the <br />connected transit, they are usually connecting to multi -family which usually goes <br />hand in hand and build off of each other. <br />Member Spencer asked when looking at a path, understanding the City has concrete <br />and asphalt, is there a set construction method for the paths. He wondered if there <br />is some sort of standard that has to be followed when construction happens. <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated the City does have some set minimum standards. The <br />City's informal preference is to do bituminous pathways first. One of the <br />advantages of this is bituminous is easier to maintain and is also wider so <br />maintenance is actually easier. This is also a lot smoother for bikers to use as well. <br />He reviewed the City standards for concrete and bituminous sidewalk construction. <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.