My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_07-27_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2021
>
2021_07-27_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2021 3:57:29 PM
Creation date
8/2/2021 3:54:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/27/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` OZ 91 Inr <br />July 13, 2021 <br />Department of Engineering <br />Attn: Marc Culver <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />Re: Proposed Amendment to Pathway Master Plan <br />Dear Marc and City Staff, <br />I appreciate your hard work with the City of Roseville and your creative process <br />in seeking meaningful enhancements and pathways for residents throughout the <br />City. l am, however, concerned about the recent, proposed pathway being <br />considered for Eustis Street. <br />A public pathway, I believe, is convenient for walking through a thick, wooded <br />area in a park -like setting or is used to provide a much safer option for <br />pedestrians near a busy street. However, St. Croix, St. Stephen and Fulham <br />Streets, as well as Hwy 36 Service Drive, Laurie Road, Marion, Acorn and <br />Fairways Lane are all consistently and heavily walked by neighbors in this <br />neighborhood. Yet none of these streets need or have pathways. However, <br />Eustis Street, the shortest, most quiet and least travelled street 'in the <br />neighborhood, is now being considered for a pathway? <br />In addition, your Proposed Amendment for the Pathway Master Plan suggests a <br />future connection eventually passing from Eustis Street to St. Croix Street. That <br />is property I believe owned by the State, not the City. During our lifetime at this <br />home, since 1986, we have personally and voluntarily maintained that adjacent <br />property by mowing, weeding, with burdock and buckthorn eradicating as much <br />as physically possible, with no help from the City or State. In spite of the <br />closeness of the freeways and taller and taller freeway lights, we have spent <br />those years establishing a more pleasant oasis for ourselves and our neighbors <br />by doing so. I would hate to think of that property soon becoming a public <br />thoroughfare and, would see any future pathway crossing that area as <br />inconsiderate of the work we have voluntarily done for the past 35 years as well <br />as destroying our personal peace, privacy and safety. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.