My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2021
>
2021-07-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2021 11:11:58 AM
Creation date
8/25/2021 11:11:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/27/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Wozniak thought this pathway may be the best option for this right-of-way <br />and it grants access to the park. He thought concerns about the wetland are valid <br />but if it became a pathway, he thought this segment would receive a lot more park <br />renewal funds. He thought there would be some tremendous improvements to the <br />vegetation and to the wetland and park itself. He saw a lot of positives happening <br />even though some people would lose access to their houses, and he did not know <br />how to overcome or replace that. He indicated he would supportthis segment added <br />to the Pathway Masterplan. <br />Motion <br />Member Wozniak moved, Member Ficek seconded, to recommend the City <br />Council approval of the Tamarack Pathway segment to the proposed Pathway <br />Master Plan Amendments. <br />Vice Chair Ficek agreed with what Chair Wozniak stated and what a lot of his <br />questions have been driving towards is that the Commission is not comparing atrail <br />to the existing condition. What the Commission is really looking at is a trail versus <br />something that goes forward with the residents costing them more money, <br />potentially a wider road, more impacts, and more expense to everyone. He <br />explained he was weighing those two future conditions against each other in his <br />decision making. He thought there were lots of issues on this one, but the City is <br />not comparing a trail to the existing condition, the Commission is looking at what <br />would go forward and what that other future condition may be. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 1 (Spencer) <br />Motion carried. <br />Member Misra wanted to thank the residents that spoke up and thought they have <br />been very courteous. <br />Chair Wozniak suggested tabling the City Council Joint Meeting Review item until <br />the August meeting given the time. He asked if members were in agreement with <br />that. <br />Consensus of the Commission was to table Item 6 (City Council Joint Meeting <br />Review) until the August PWETC meeting. <br />6. City Council Joint Meeting Review <br />7. Items for Next Meeting — August 24, 2021 <br />Discussion ensued regarding the August PWETC agenda: <br />• City Council Joint Meeting Review <br />• Conversation regarding the Implementation of the Energy Action Plan <br />• City Campus Tour in the future, possibly September <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.