My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-10-5_PR_Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2021
>
2021-10-5_PR_Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2021 5:13:38 PM
Creation date
9/30/2021 5:13:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.Review of the Park Naming Process Related to Possible Renaming of Pocahontas <br />Park <br />At the September meeting, the Commission decided to recommend to the City Council that <br />the name of Pocahontas Park be changed. This recommendation will be made in a joint <br />meeting at a regular City Council meeting on October 25. <br />n preparation for if theCity Council concurs with the above recommendation, a <br />In addition, i <br />discussion occurred on possible ways to move forward with determining a new name. <br />Traditionally, the Commission has followed the attached City policy (Parks and Recreation <br />Policy 40: Assigning Names to City Facilities) to determine park names. A typical naming <br />process has included the following and has worked well in the past: <br />1.Review of ci <br />ty policy for assigning names to city facilities. <br />2.Solicit suggestions from the community. <br />3.Discuss the history of the property. <br />4.Discuss options for names. <br />5.Formulate a recommendation for consideration City Council. <br />It is important to compare this with any process that you might propose. Please be <br />prepared to identify and outline any deviations you are interested in pursuing so that can be <br />shared with the City Council. <br />Enclosed are the two most recent examples for the naming of Midland Gardens Park and <br />Unity Park. <br />At your September meeting, several areas were generally discussed including the <br />following: <br />Commission members expressed concern with a lack of name suggestions to date. <br />One possible reason for this could be the lack of a definitive answer regarding <br />whether the name was going to change or not, i.e. residents were reluctant to <br />propose a new name without knowing for certain it was going to change. <br />The importance of Native American participation in the selection of a new name <br />Although several Native American groups and individuals provided feedback on the <br />Pocahontas name, they had been reluctant at this point to suggest a new name. It is <br />possible that if the name is officially changed, they will be more willing to provide <br />suggestions. <br />A discussion on the possible use of a stipend to invite Native American individuals <br />to participate in the process. <br />It is suggested that you take the time at this meeting to discuss and agree as a commission <br />on a defined process to share with the City Council for their concurrence. <br />Requested Commission Action: Review current naming policy and typical process. <br />Outline and decide as a commission body ifyou would like to suggest following the above <br />process or identify any specific deviations to suggest to the City Council at your joint <br />meeting on October 25. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.