Laserfiche WebLink
ultimately disregard it. <br />Finally, while it would be ideal to have a committee of Indigenous <br />people who live and work in Roseville be the ones to serve on a <br />committee, I expect it will be difficult to find enough people based <br />on simply numbers of Indigenous residents. Non-residents would <br />not have a vested interest in the name of a Roseville Park, so <br />that is another reason we would need to pay them for their <br />expertise. <br />If a group is convened to discuss the park name, it would be <br />great to follow the suggestion of Keely Vandre to consider <br />additional park updates that could help reflect and educate the <br />community on the Dakota people by including native plantings, <br />educational trail, natural playground, etc. <br />My hope is that by paying an Indigenous led group to lead the <br />decision on the park name (and possible amenities), we will also <br />learn new ways to collaborate and make decisions that we have <br />not considered before. The richness of our community comes <br />from its diversity, and we have a great opportunity to enhance <br />that diversity. Thank you breaking old patterns of decision <br />making and setting a course to become a truly inclusive and <br />welcoming community. <br />(https://www.mnhs.org/ramseyhouse/learn/alexander-ramsey) <br />https://www.minnpost.com/mnopedia/2016/06/sad-legacy- <br />american-indian-boarding-schools-minnesota-and-us/ <br />Unless restricted by law, all correspondence to and from Roseville City <br />government offices, including information submitted through electronic forms such <br />as this one, may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act <br />and/or may be disclosed to third parties. <br />Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. <br /> <br />