My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-4_PR_Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2021
>
2021-11-4_PR_Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2021 4:24:33 PM
Creation date
10/28/2021 4:24:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Arneson noted that the new tennis courts at Roseville Area High School are not <br />available to the public. Therefore, he agrees with the proposal to upgrade the courts at <br />Education Center. <br />Commissioner Ybarra reiterated the importance of timing during the project to ensure there is <br />limiteddisplacement for players of either sport. In addition, she noted that walking or biking access <br />to the courts should be considered. She also relayed that she has been paying attention to the “sounds <br />of pickleball” and does not find the noise offensive. She believes courts could potentially be placed <br />near homes. Lastly, she added that the current project will not address the future demand for <br />pickleball courts and she encouraged a long-term plan. <br />The Commission discussed the importance of the project timeline, potential lighting options at <br /> and possible future locations for additional pickleball courts. <br />Vice-Chair Dahlstrom moved to approve the recommendation of converting Evergreen <br />Park tennis courts into permanent pickleball courts <br />Education Center (Fairview) tennis court to the City Council. Commissioner Brown <br />seconds. <br /> <br /> Roll Call <br />Ayes: Arneson, Baggenstoss, Boulton, Brown, Dahlstrom, Lenhart, Ybarra and Hoag. <br />Nays: None. <br />Abstain: None. <br /> <br />5) REVIEW OF THE PARK NAMING PROCESS RELATED TO POSSIBLE RENAMING OF <br />POCAHONTAS PARK <br />Staff provided a review of the process that has historically been used to name Roseville parks. <br /> <br />Process <br /> Review of the city policy <br /> Solicit suggestions <br /> Discuss the history of the property <br /> Discuss options for names <br /> Formulate a recommendation for City Council consideration <br /> <br />Basic Policy Principles on Naming and Examples <br /> Primary Principles <br />o Natural habitat <br />o Geographic location <br />o Non-descript terms <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.