Laserfiche WebLink
32 EVIEW OF R EQUEST <br />R <br />33 The Davis Group seeksto purchase roughly 4.53 acres of the underutilized Veritas Campus and <br />34 construct a three story, 55,000 square feet Class “A” medical office building. Such an endeavor <br />35 requires an amendment to the CPPUD because this request is inconsistent with both the original <br />36 (1997) and amended (2001) plan for the Veritas Campus area. In addition to the CPPUD <br />37 amendment, a minor plat is necessary to recombine the existing three lots into two lots. Thus, if <br />38 approved, the proposed PUD amendment would replace the Veritas Master Site Plan (which allowed <br />39 threeoffice buildings, surface and structured parking), with a plan to create two lots: one for Veritas <br />40 as it exists today and the other in support of the proposed medical office building (Attachment D). <br />41 In 2018, the Planning Division began working with The Davis Group on their desire to purchase a <br />42 portion of the Veritas campus to construct a medical office building. On August 28, 2018, The <br />43 Davis Group held the required Open House at the nearby Hampton Inn, 2050 Iona Lane West. The <br />44 meeting began at 6pm and was attended by Patrick Giordana (Synergy Architecture Studio), Mark <br />45 Davis (The Davis Group), and Tom Stella (Cushman Wakefield representing Veritas).Also in <br />46 attendance was one resident (a Roseville Planning Commissioner) who had no specific questions nor <br />47 indicated any concerns or issues with the proposal. Since the Open House meeting in 2018,The <br />48 Davis Group has been working with Veritas on finalizing the project and purchase details. <br />49 P LANNING D IVISION R ECOMMENDATION <br />50 City staff view the proposal as a net decrease in the overall anticipated traffic occurring on the <br />51 Veritas property as the proposal reduces the total allowed office space by 67,000 square feet <br />52 compared to the 2001 CPPUD amendment and 6,000 square feet compared to the original CPPUD. <br />53 It is also worth noting,thataccess to the new office building and the existing Veritas office will be <br />54 shared from the two existing access points on to Centre Pointe Drive. <br />55 In discussions with City staff at the March 12, 2020 Development Review Committee (DRC) <br />56 meeting,it was determined that the proposal to change the Veritas master site plan, resulting in a <br />57 three story medical office building, was not impactful to the area considering what is inherently <br />58 permitted by the existing PUD. While less dense than the originally anticipated development, the <br />59 proposed three-story office use remains consistent with the uses allowed within the Centre Pointe <br />60 Business Park and under the PUD. Therefore, the Planning Division recommends approval of the <br />61 requested PUD amendment, thereby modifying the Veritas master site plan by eliminating two office <br />62 buildings, four stories in heighttotaling 122,000 square feet and replacing it with a single office <br />63 building on a separate lot, three stories in height and 55,000 square feetin size. The proposed <br />64 development will be requiredto achieve compliance with the standards outlined in PUD #1177, as <br />65 amended in 2019, as it relates to development standards including setbacks, parking, exterior <br />66 building materials, etc. <br />67 S UGGESTED P LANNING C OMMISSION A CTION <br />68 By motion, recommend approval of the requested Planned Unit Development amendment for 2815 <br />69 Centre Pointe Drive, modifying the Veritas master site plan to eliminate two office buildings, four <br />70 stories in height and encompassing 122,000 square feet and replacing the master site plan with a <br />71 single office building on a separate lot, three stories in height and 55,000 square feet in size. The <br />72 proposed development will be required to achieve compliance with the standards outlined in PUD <br />73 #1177, as amended in 2019. <br />74 A LTERNATIVE A CTIONS <br />75 a. Pass a motion to table the item for future action. An action to table must be tied to the need for <br />76 clarity, analysis and/or information necessary to make a recommendation on the request. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />