My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_0518_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_0518_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2022 9:35:26 AM
Creation date
1/7/2022 9:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/18/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
569
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ject <br />Prior <br />Attachment B <br />Following <br />by the Roseville <br />Council’s <br /> <br />e located within the <br />Further, the 2030 <br /> <br />adopted <br />he 2040 Comprehensive <br />was <br />Response Thank you for your comment. Considering no suitable wildlife habitat is located within the prosite, no threatened, endangered or rare species are anticipated to be found within <br /> the project site and no impacts are anticipated. All other layers were reviewed, and no MBS native plant communities, karst and fen features or sites of Biodiversity arproject site. <br /> Project proposal will obtain said letter of concurrence and it will be saved to the project file. Thank you for your comment. Considering the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is in process, <br /> the proposed land use was used for the basis of this EAW. the Metropolitanauthorization of Roseville’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan on April 22, 2020, tPlan City Council on May 4, 2020.to <br /> any land use approvals or issuance of any permits for the project area, Roseville’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan will be fully enacted.Comprehensive Plan identifies the <br />- <br />5109). <br />- <br />259 <br />- <br />n because they <br />, 651 <br />still in effect. The <br />this is a formal environmental <br />risk species from entering the <br />- <br />7 <br />Metropolitan Council authorized the <br /> <br />listed threatened species was identified <br />. The proposer should submit their <br />-lisa.joyal@state.mn.us <br />A Natural Heritage Inventory review was <br />965, but a letter of concurrence is still needed and <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />1330) <br />- <br />602 <br />in one mile of the project <br />- <br />IONS, RESPONSES TO COMMENTS <br />Comment Page 15, Section 13.b.conducted using LAreview document and a statewithassessment of rare species and natural resource features with potential project impacts, and request a <br /> concurrence from Lisa Joyal, Endangered Species Review Coordinator (Given the industrial nature of the site, we acknowledge that impact to rare species is unlikely to occur from this <br /> project. That said, it is important to let the NHIS staff make that determinatioItem 8. Permits and Approvals Required; Item 9. Land Use (Eric Wojchik, 651The EAW states that the proposed <br /> project is consistent with the planned land use in the City’s 2040 Plan, which is Community MixedUse. However, the City has not yet adopted the 2040 Plan. Until the 2040 Plan is adopted <br /> by the City, the 2030 Plan is2030 Plan (current adopted Plan) identifies the land use for the site as Industrial. In order to be consistent with State environmental rules, adoption <br /> of the 2040 Plan must occur prior to development commencing. Please note that the City of Roseville’s 2040 Plan on April 22, 2020. <br />should be attached to the EAW because have the most up to date survey information and might have recommendations to prevent certain atconstruction site. <br /> <br />CLUS <br /> <br /> <br />Responder Angela Torres, AICP <br /> <br /> <br />Entity Metropolitan Council <br />RECORD OF DECISIONFINDINGS OF FACT AND CON <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.