My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_0518_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_0518_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2022 9:35:26 AM
Creation date
1/7/2022 9:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/18/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
569
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 20. Other Potential Environmental Effects(Cameran Bailey, 651-602-1212) <br />Urban Heat Island Effect –The proposed development maintains the existing urban heat <br />island (UHI) effect, which increases the demand on the electrical grid to meet cooling load <br />requirements, increases the cost of living due to higher cooling load demands, exacerbates <br />the impacts of heat waves, and increases the vulnerability of the humans most at risk to <br />such heat events-those 65 and older (MN Dept. of Health “MN Climate Change <br />Vulnerability Assessment”, page 20). Decreasing the site’s impervious surface footprint by 2 <br />acres is commendable, but marginal relative to 13.53acres which will continue to be <br />impervious. <br />o The project proposer should consider mitigation of UHI effects by installing green roofs, <br />cool roofs, planting and maintaining trees, incorporating trees into site design, and <br />constructing cool, reflective, and permeable pavements (Metropolitan Council, “Keeping <br />Our Cool: Extreme Heat in the Twin Cities Region”). Such measures would also be in <br />line with a resilience goal in Roseville’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan: “Take action to <br />equitably reduce climaterelated risks to City residents.” <br />GHG Mitigation –The proposed development will maintain a large electrical and natural gas <br />density of consumption, which will continue to drive greenhouse gas emissions, which drive <br />climate change, and the negative environmental impacts that come with it. <br />o The project proposershould consider the integration of green roofs and trees into the <br />site design as they increase energy efficiency, decrease operating and living costs, and <br />decrease the consumption of electricity and natural gas on site. <br />o The project proposer should consider the integration of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems <br />into the rooftop design and utility of the proposed development, as well as into the <br />surface parking lot design. Approximately 5 acres of surface parking can accommodate <br />the development of 5 megawatts ofsolar electricity production. Five megawatts of <br />annual electricity production would meet the annual electricity needs of the 565 <br />proposed units more than twice over. Such implementation would be in line with two <br />resilience goals in Roseville’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan: “Examine opportunities to <br />allow and encourage solar installations within public and private parking lots.”; “Strive to <br />produce enough solar electricity within City boundaries to meet 10 percent of citywide <br />electricity use by 2030, which aligns with Minnesota’s solar energy goal (M.S. <br />216B.1962).” <br />Forecasts(Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) <br />The EAW describes a redevelopment with seven commercial buildings (totaling 550,000 square <br />feet of floorspace) and three residential complexes (505 housing units). <br />The site is in TAZ #1859. The City’s TAZ allocation, submitted with its 2040 Comprehensive <br />Plan, expects growth of 147 households, 390 population, and 700 jobs during 2020-2040. <br />Should this development proceed, the TAZ #1859 allocation for 2030 and 2040 must be <br />increased. Council staff recommend adding 350 households and 550 population on top of the <br />current allocation. The increase can be offset with reductions in zones elsewhere in Roseville. A <br />forecast change to the City total is not necessary at this time. <br />The TAZ table can be revised through correspondence with Council staff, separate from a <br />formal review process. <br />Page -3|May 6, 2020|METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.