My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_0518_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_0518_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2022 9:35:26 AM
Creation date
1/7/2022 9:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/18/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
569
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 The site comprises land from three earlier plats: <br />2 The triangular area on the western side of the site was a remnant outlot from The Lexington plat <br />3 of 1988. <br />4 The undeveloped right-of-way for Lexington Place and the six undeveloped residential lots in the <br />5 northeastern part of the site was part of the 1953 Roseville Heights No. 2 plat. <br />6 The undeveloped right-of-way for Lexington Avenue and the six undeveloped residential lots in <br />7 the southeastern part of the site was part of the 1948 Roseville Heights plat. <br />8 On behalf of the property owners, the applicant proposes to replat the land and develop the site with a <br />9 32-unit, row house neighborhood on the northern part of the site and the southern portion would remain <br />10 undeveloped. The proposed preliminary plat is illustrated in Attachment C, along with other <br />11 development information. <br />12 When exercising the “quasi-judicial” authority on subdivision requests, the role of the City is to <br />13 determine the facts associated with a particular proposal and apply those facts to the legal standards <br />14 contained in the ordinance and relevantstate law. In general, if the facts indicate the application meets <br />15 the relevant legal standards and will not compromise the public health, safety,and general welfare, then <br />16 the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City is, however, able to add conditions to <br />17 subdivision approvals to ensure that potential impacts to parks, schools, roads, storm sewers, and other <br />18 public infrastructure on and around the subject property are adequately addressed. Subdivisions may <br />19 also be modified to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to provide for the <br />20 orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote housing affordability for all levels. <br />21 Preliminary Plat Analysis <br />22 Roseville’s Development Review Committee (DRC) met on several occasions in early 2020 to review <br />23 the proposed subdivision plans. Some of the comments and feedback based on the DRC’s review of the <br />24 application are included in the analysis below, and the full comments offered by DRC members are <br />25 included with this RCA as Attachment D. <br />26 Proposed Lots <br />27 Although there are no minimum width or depth requirements for lots in the MDR zoning district, the <br />28 proposed lots for middle units in the row house structures are 24 feet wide, and the end units are 32 feet <br />29 wide. The MDR district does require a minimum area of 3,600 square feet per dwelling unit (a total of <br />30 115,200 square feet) across the development. Without including the proposed private street or the area <br />31 being considered for park dedication, the Lexington Woods plat would meet this area requirement with <br />32 about 125,000 square feet. This area is equal to about 2.87 acres, which puts the proposed 32-unit <br />33 development at 11.15 units per acre, conforming to the MDR district’s 12 dwellings per acre limit. <br />34 Although building setbacks are not specifically reviewed and approved as part of a plat application, the <br />35 buildings represented in the development plans do appear to conform to the minimum setbacks of the <br />36 MDR district. <br />37 Easements <br />38 Roseville’s City Engineer has indicated the following: <br />39 Right-of-Way and easement vacations required, and staff supports the vacations provided new <br />40 easements will be dedicated in the plat. <br />7d RCA <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.