My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_0921_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_0921_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2022 1:59:47 PM
Creation date
1/10/2022 1:59:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/21/2020
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I think it's terrible that the city is taking away one of the very few fields it allows the Roseville <br />Youth Girls Fastpitch Association teams to use without providing a comparable replacement <br />option. <br />I would like to see lexington focused more on enabling people walking/biking to the civic campus <br />to do so safely and comfortably. How great would it be for a family park at Central Park, then <br />bike over to City Hall? <br />I definitely don't favor the option that includes rerouting Woodhill. I remember the ruckus a few <br />years back when C2 was "connected." Rerouting Woodhill would increase traffic through the <br />residential area that C2 bisects, to its detriment. <br />My second favorite concept isA1. I dislike concept C because I feel rerouting an entire street <br />seems like too much and is there really a need for that. <br />Leave it where it is <br />Like the park next to vfw to eat and play at when getting their food and all the extra space for <br />them to do other things <br />Not liking the lost of existing park space. <br />Q12-What else would you like us to know? <br />What are the proposed time frame for the development? <br />People can work from home so their space could Be repurposed and save some money on <br />building new. <br />More walking paths, add sidewalks to woodhill, lots of trees planted. Water feature possible? <br />Will the cost of each plan be attached anytime soon? <br />Cost of the different options, including environmental as well as financial. <br />I would like the city to take budgeting and fiscal responsibility. I dont feel the city should have <br />purchased the license center building. I think we could have done without purchasing it <br />Can you post these plans outside the ice arena entrance so more people -who actually use the <br />facilities -can see them? and thus provide input. <br />Its fine how it is. Stop wasting money and keep our police funded and on the streets. <br />It is a Roseville icon leave it there <br />Roseville contains finite space yet the city and departments seem to be expanding at faster rate. <br />Multi family properties are outnumbering single family homes. <br />Q18 -What is your age? <br />Under 18(0) <br />18-24 years old(1) <br />25-34 years old(3) <br />35-44 years old(3) <br />45-54 years old(3) <br />Over 55 years old(8) <br />I prefer not to say(2) <br />Q19 -What is your gender? <br />Male(10) <br />Female(10) <br />Prefer not to say(1) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.