Laserfiche WebLink
91 <br />92 Draft Language – Attachment C(creates a business license for rentals less than 30 days) <br />93The draft ordinance provided as Attachment C is based on Chapter 907 of current code, which <br />94 regulates residential rentals of one to four units through a registration process, yet recognizes the <br />95 business element of short-term rentals by requiring a business license. Staff feels this process is <br />96 appropriate if the Council is uninterested in a short-term rental ban. Since this is an entirely new <br />97Chapter, all language is in Underline format, indicating new language. <br />98 <br />99Thedraftlanguage proposed by staffaims to accomplishthe following: <br />1001. Defines short-term rental as a whole home rental of less than 30 days. Home <br />101and/or room rentals that are owner-occupied for the duration of the rental period <br />102would be excluded. This definition specifies that a short-term rental for the sole <br />103purpose of holding a social or commercial event is prohibited and that short-term <br />104 rentals cannot occur in recreational vehicles, campers or other similar vehicles. <br />105 2. Requires Council approval of a business license for a short-term rental. <br />106 3. Maximum over-night sleeping occupancy is proposed the same as Chapter 907 of <br />107 City Code, which is a maximum of four unrelated adults or a family. <br />108 4. Requirements including a license fee, collection of local lodging tax, and issuance <br />109 of administrative fines for violations to the ordinance. These fees would help <br />110 offset the cost of enforcement. <br />111 5. Outlines a process for enforcement of the ordinance, including provisions for <br />112 suspension, revocation, and reinstatement. <br />113 6. Includes notification to properties within 350’ of the short-term rental only when <br />114 consideration of a license suspension, revocation or reinstatement is presented <br />115 before Council. <br />116 <br />117 M ISCELLANEOUS I TEMS FOR C ONSIDERATION <br />118 Staff acknowledges this topic is far more complicated when one considers actual enforcement. <br />119 When considering the three options outlined above, staff would note the following: <br />120 1. The burden of enforcement will be on the Police Department, who will rely solely <br />121 on the neighborhood for reporting issues. If a license is created, Community <br />122 Development will notify PD of properties holding this license. Community <br />123 Development would also work with Administration on the actual license issuance, <br />124 suspension and revocations processes. <br />th <br />125 2. While the Council expressed no interest during the August 24 discussion on a <br />126 ban, staff was contacted after the meeting by some Council members who were <br />127interested in reviewing language that would ban short-term rentals as part of the <br />128next discussion on the topic. Staff thinks a ban is reasonable in that it impacts <br />129very few properties, yet solves substantial problems. Council also expressed <br />130some interest in treating short-term rentals differently in terms of what activities <br />131are allowed to occur. Staff has concerns that it will be difficult to discern what a <br />132social or commercial “event” is versus having guests over to the home. While the <br />133code language proposed in Attachment C states short-term rentals for the sole <br />134purpose of holding a social or commercial event is prohibited, we are not <br />135 confident in how to enforce this restriction as it is likely impractical to require all <br />136 parties staying at the home to be noted on the lease AND to require the lessee to <br />137 present said lease to ensure enforcement (leases are legal documents to which the <br />138 City is not a party). Staff suggests “violations” are only those items listed under <br />139the Registration, Suspensions, and Revocation section. <br />140 3. There was a suggestion, received via email by a resident, that lakeshore property <br />141be treated differently than non-lakeshore property. While two of the three <br /> <br />