Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />SECTION TWO:The following outlines revisions that could be considered as part of the Zoning <br />Code updatebut are not necessarily needed to ensure consistency with the <br />2040 Comprehensive Plan: <br />Identifyincentives for incorporating sustainabilitymeasures <br />Identify itemsrelated to racial equity and inclusion issues <br />Address pronoun use throughout Title 10 <br />Allow increased MDR density by conditional use, like what is allowed in the HDR districts <br />Require covered parking for multi-family housing (For example:.5-1 stall / dwelling unit) <br />Landscaping & Screening in All Districts (1011.03) –reduce tree requirements for multi-family <br />residential (one tree/dwelling unit too many –multiple variances granted) <br />Chapter 1017 (shoreland, wetland and storm water management) <br />o Revise wetland setbacks to align with Rice Creek Watershed District regulations <br />o Update shoreland ordinance to comply with state/DNR model ordinance–at a minimum <br />we need to add language concerning Shoreland Alteration & Vegetation Alterations in <br />Shoreland Areas, which was inadvertently deleted some time ago <br />Definitions –what’s missing/needs revision? Refer to use tables of all zoning districts. Example: <br />“Bed and Breakfast Establishment” definition needs revision so as not to be confused/conflicted <br />with a rental home and/or rental bedroom that is otherwise governed under Title 9 of the City <br />Code. May also need to add a lodging use and/or revise the lodging definition to address home <br />rentals, including prohibition on commercial events within home rentals. <br />Consider revising the Conditional Use requirement in the Community Mixed Use Districts <br />regarding multi-family uses of 3 units/building or greater to a higher densitythreshold <br />From the Council’s list of “Items for Future Scheduling”: <br />o Consider increased green space requirements for MDR and HDR (caution: must consider <br />balance between theneed for green space, its impact on lower overall densities, density <br />commitments made within the Comprehensive Plan, and the demand and affordability of <br />housing units) <br />o Are the current minimum residential lot sizes appropriate in all districts? <br />o Screening requirements for solar arrays <br />o Institutional zoning district amendments to addressexisting and potential rangeof <br />housing types (i.e. convent, rectory, day care/Montessori schools, affordable housing) <br />PROCESS:The City of Roseville’s Community Development Departmentseeks interested <br />consultants to work collaboratively with City staff to accomplish the above list <br />of Zoning Code Amendments. <br />The intent under this Scope of Work is for the consultant to researchand prepare the necessary code <br />amendmentlanguage, with input and feedback provided by City staff,and for City staff to <br />manage/overseethe process and advance such code amendments through the Planning Commission and <br />City Council approval processes. The estimated cost to complete the work outlined herein should be <br />provided in two parts: 1) Section One, and 2) Section Two. The items outlined in Section One are to be <br />completed first, recognizing there may be some overlap between the amendments in both sections. The <br />timeframe for completion of Section One is April 30, 2021 and Section Two is December 31, 2021. <br /> <br />