My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_1026_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_1026_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2022 2:15:28 PM
Creation date
1/10/2022 2:15:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
10/26/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />66 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where customers are served their food from a counter <br />67 or in a motor vehicle, mostly in disposable packages prepared to leave the premises or to be <br />68 taken to a table or booth for consumption on the premises. Fast food can be a café, coffee shop, <br />69 ice cream shop, and/or deli. Fast food restaurants may or may not serve intoxicating alcoholic <br />70 beverages to be consumed upon the premises. Food sales shall account for over 50% of the gross <br />71 receipts at any restaurant serving intoxicating alcoholic beverages.Fast food restaurants may <br />72 include drive-through facilities, which are regulated separately. <br />73 Restaurant, traditional: An establishment in which customers are served their food in or on <br />74 non-disposable dishes to be consumed primarily while seated at tables or booths within a <br />75 building, and which may or may not serve intoxicating alcoholic beverages to be consumed upon <br />76 the premises. Food sales shall account for over 50% of the gross receipts at any restaurant <br />77 serving intoxicating alcoholic beverages. Traditional restaurants may also be a café, cafeteria or <br />78 buff et, coffee shop, and/or deli. Customers may take away food, but drive-through facilities are <br />79 not allowed. <br />80 The Planning Division is impartial on this request, however, there may be benefits to amending the <br />81 Code in support of drive-throughs on select parcels in the current CMU-4 district. Specifically, if we <br />82 are to support fast food as a conditional or permitted use, it would seem logical to also support the <br />83 drive-through since a majority of these restaurants will not occupy space or construct facilities <br />84 without a drive-through. Further, the City Engineer requires a traffic study for all drive-through <br />85 facilities since traffic tends to be the greatest concern for drive-throughs in commercial areas. <br />86 Lastly, in review of the Twin Lakes Area CMU districts, there is little land left to develop or <br />87 redevelop that is appropriate for fast food with drive-through. The Planning Division considers only <br />88 the two lots in front of Walmart and possibly the retail portion of the Launch Properties <br />89 redevelopment of the former Boaters Outlet site to be suitable areas or parcels for drive-throughs <br />90 associated with a fast food restaurant.It is conceivable the Fireside Corner and the Tile Shop could <br />91 be redeveloped in the future and seek a CU for a fast food drive-through. However, it is not <br />92 anticipated the other 12 properties would be redeveloped into a fast food restaurant. <br />93 P LANNING D IVISION R ECOMMENDATION <br />94 If the Planning Commission is inclined to support a change in the allowance of drive-throughs <br />95 associated with fast food restaurants, the Planning Division would recommend changing the NP to a <br />96 C for Restaurant, Fast Food w/Drive-Through in the CMU-4 district as noted below: <br />Commercial Uses <br />Pawn Shop <br />NP NP NP NP <br />Restaurant, fast food <br />C C P P <br />Restaurant, fast food w/drive-through Y <br />NP NP NP NP C <br />Restaurants, traditional <br />PP PP <br />97 The Planning Division has also included Attachment B, a highlighted map representing the <br />98 properties available for development in the CMU-4 district that such a text amendment would affect <br />99 and Attachment C the zoning map of Twin Lakes and the current CMU district. <br />100 S UGGESTED P LANNING C OMMISSION A CTION <br />101 The Planning Commission should discuss the merits of the three options noted in lines 27-38 of the <br />102 RPCA, take public input on the proposed amendment, and make a recommendation to either support <br />103 or deny the application. <br />PF20-27_RPCA_100720.docx <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.