Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date:November 9, 2020 <br /> Item No.: 7.c <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br /> <br />Item Description: Review the 2021 Utility Rate Adjustments <br /> <br />1 B ACKGROUND <br />2 Unlike many city services that are supported by property taxes, our utility or enterprise operations are <br />3 funded primarily by user fees and are operated as separate, stand-alone functions. Overthe past several <br />4 months, city staff has been reviewing the City’s utility operations to determine what customer rate <br />5 adjustments are necessary for 2021. The City engaged Ehlers to perform a comprehensive utility rate <br />6 study of the Water and Storm Drainage Funds based on the cash situations in these two funds. <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 Operational Review <br />10 <br />11 Water Fund Operations <br />12 At December 31, 2019, the Water Fund had to internally borrow $1,234,554 from other funds to <br />13 eliminate the cash deficit. This fund has had a steadily declining cash balance for the past four years. <br />14 Staff identified that the rate setting formula was changed in 2014 which unfortunately has an error <br />15 when converting the water purchased from St. Paul from cubic feet to the Roseville system which is <br />16 billed in gallon units. In addition, the capital projects done for the water system have exceed the <br />17 averages used in the formula. We engaged Ehlers to perform a utility study on this fund which was <br />th <br />18 presented at the October 19 Council meeting. <br />19 <br />20 Ehlers presented two separate options, both introduce new water usage tier rates for Residential, <br />21 Commercial and Apartment properties. Both options realign who pays for water versus who uses water <br />22 to provide more equity and the definition of fixed costs versus variable costs adheres to the industry <br />23 standards. Option 2 provides for an average of capital costs to be included in the fixed costs, which is <br />24 more in line with our current structure. Option 1 would put the average capital costs on the <br />25 usage/variable side of the rates. <br />26 <br />27 Storm Drainage Operations <br />28 The City provides for the management of storm water drainage to prevent flooding and pollution <br />29 control, as well as the street sweeping program. The cash balance in this fund had been steadily <br />30 declining so this fund was included in the utility rate study done by Ehlers. The study showed that the <br />31 current rate structure is equitable and needs a steady increase of 4% for the next four years to build up <br />32 some reserves to pay for the capital needs in this fund. After four years, the rate increases will level off <br />33 to about 1% annually thereafter. Staff will continue to monitor this fund and the needed capital <br />34 projects. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br />