My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020_1130_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020
>
2020_1130_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 1:09:18 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 1:08:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
11/30/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Roseville Public Works, Environment <br /> and Transportation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />EXCERPT OF FULL DRAFT MINUTES <br />Tuesday, October 27, 2020, at 6:30 p.m. <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br />5.Proposed 2021 Utility Rates <br />Mr. Culver explained each year City staff proposes utility rates for the following budget <br />year. These rates are for all the City utility funds including water, sanitary sewer, storm <br />sewer and recycling. He noted this year staff commissioned a detailed study of the water <br />and storm sewer utility rates. He indicated Finance Director Pietrick would also be <br />available for questions. He went through the Ehlers presentation with the Commission. <br />Member Misra indicated in the apartment water usage slide it struck her that the lower tier <br />cut off is right between two very equal bars and wondered what formula went into <br />determining where to place the cut off. <br />Mr. Culver explained the idea was to hit those percentiles. The fiftieth and ninetieth <br />percentile. The fiftieth percentile happened to fall in between the two even bars shown. <br />He continued with the presentation. <br />Ms. Pietrick noted the 1.71 percent increase would be if there were no changes made in the <br />rate structure. If the City went with Ehlers Option One the overall quarterly bill would go <br />down 11.78 percent and Ehlers Option Two the overall quarterly bill would go down 7.9 <br />percent. <br />Vice Chair Huiett indicated she would like the Commission to make comments and ask <br />questions, then also a discussion about some of the pros and cons on Ehlers Options One <br />and Two and possibly give a recommendation to the City Council. She also thought it was <br />a good point about the bonding opportunity for the 2.5 million and a really important aspect <br />of this conversation and what it means overall to have the City pay for things, which comes <br />into play and there is a lot of positive feedback around bonding and she shares those <br />feelings as well. <br />Vice Chair Huiett opened the meeting for public comment. No one was in attendance to <br />comment. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.