Laserfiche WebLink
35 Additionally, the City Council should identify other topics that should be added to Roseville’s <br />36 Legislative Priorities. <br />37 Staff is recommending that the following items should be discussed for possible inclusion to the 2021 <br />38 Legislative Priorities: <br />39 Increase in fees allocated to local Deputy Registrars. This was a city legislative priority in <br />40 2019 and the Legislature did approve a fee increase during that session. However, additional <br />41 increases are needed due to the impact of COVID-19 and the rollout of the new statewide <br />42 licensing system by the State, which puts more work burden on Deputy Registrar staff. Metro <br />43 Cities has a direct legislative policy advocating for increases in fees and more equitable sharing <br />44 of state fees in orderto help local Deputy Registrars fund operations. (Attachment B). <br />45 Local Option Sales Tax. State law allows local governments to institute a local sales tax after <br />46 legislative approval and a voter referendum. This is a topic briefly discussed by the City Council <br />47 in the past and given the current condition of the economy due to the COVID pandemic, it may <br />48 not be appropriate to include as a legislative priority at this time. Additional information about <br />49 the local sales tax option process is included as Attachment C. <br />50 Additional Funding for the OVAL. In the last legislative session, the City of Roseville <br />51 received $3.9 million of funding in the bonding bill for the OVAL. In a condition assessment <br />52 report conducted in 2018, costs of approximately $5 million were identified for repairs and <br />53 improvement to the OVAL and its associated facilities. An additional $1.1 million is needed to <br />54 complete all identified and needed improvements. The next state bonding bill will be considered <br />55 in 2022. <br />56 Prior to taking her seat, Council member Strahan provided information on her legislative priorities to the <br />57 City Council which is included as Attachment D, along with the documents referenced in the email. <br />58 P OLICY O BJECTIVE <br />59 Advocating for Roseville’s Legislative Priorities will provide a voice to the Minnesota Legislature and <br />60 Governor on items and issues that are important to the community and city operations. <br />61 B UDGET I MPLICATIONS <br />62 Not directly applicable to the Legislative Priorities. However individual items may have a cost impact to <br />63 the City, either negatively or positively, depending on the topic and outcome. <br />64 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION <br />65 Staff recommends the City Council should review 2020 Legislative Priorities and discuss what should be <br />66 included as part of the 2021 Legislative Priorities <br />67 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION <br />68 The City Council should discuss and provide direction on Roseville’s 2021 Legislative Priorities for staff <br />69 to bring back for final consideration at a future City Council meeting. <br />Prepared by: Patrick Trudgeon, City Manager (651) 792-7021 <br /> <br />Attachments: A: 2020 Roseville Legislative Priorities <br /> B: Metro Cities Legislative policy regarding Deputy Registrar Fees <br /> C: Minnesota Local Option Sales Tax Information <br /> D: Council member Strahan’s Legislative Priorities <br />Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />