CCP 02222021 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

352 Each of these additional requirements is fairly clear, except for the standard about specific lot size. 353 While the provision does refer to lot width, the width of this shared access parcel is either much wider 354 than 170 feet or much narrower, depending on where the measurement is made. Notwithstanding the 355 uncertainty of exactly howto apply this requirement, the Planning Commission determinedthis standard 356 is not a limiting factor in this case. If the “specific size” of this parcel is determined by measuring its 357 width along S McCarrons Boulevard or along the shoreline, then its greater-than 400-foot width clearly 358 exceeds the minimum standard. If the specific size is measured in the main body of the parcel, by 359 contrast, then its width would be as little as 30 feet. In either case, the boundaries of this parcel of 360 lakeshore land are not changing by virtue of becoming Outlot B of The Enclave at McCarrons Lake plat; 361 to the extent its specific size may be found to be substandard, this deficiency is clearly a legal, 362 nonconforming condition. Finally, as these are standards established in the zoning code, they do not 363 need to be specified as conditions of approval of the controlled access as a conditional use. 364 Public Comment 365 Additional public comments sent to the City after the conclusion of the pre-application engagement 366 effort are, as noted above, included with this RCA as part of Attachment D. The duly noticed public 367 hearing for themany land use approvals requested to facilitate the proposed developmentwas held by 368 the Planning Commission on February 3, 2021. Members of the public who participated in the public 369 hearing mostly spoke in opposition to the proposal, citing similar concerns to those raised during and 370 after the pre-application engagement. Draft minutes of the public hearing are included as Attachment F. 371 At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend 372 approval of all parts of the proposal.The Commission’s recommendations contain several conditions 373 approval, including onerequiring the developer to increase the number of trees planted between Lot 1 374 and Galtier Street as a compromise between the proposed plantings in that location and the request from 375 a member of the public to dedicate Lot 1 as park land to preserve more trees in that location. 376 P OLICY O BJECTIVE 377 378 and retains a diverse mix of people, family types, economic statuses,ages,and so on. 379 Employ flexible zoning for property redevelopment to meet broader housing goals such as 380 density, open space, and lot size. 381 Explore opportunities to encourage smaller housing un 382 development (which could include propriate housing to reflect the population 383 demographics ofthe City), and opportunities to address the lack of housing in the “missing 384 middle”. 385 B UDGET I MPLICATIONS 386 Refer to DRC comments in Attachment E. 387 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION 388 Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission: 389 A. Adopt a resolution approving the requested Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Change from 390 Low-Density Residential to Medium-Density Residential at 196 S McCarrons Boulevard, based 391 on the content of this RCA, public input, and City Council deliberation regarding the goals and 392 strategies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the 2018 Comprhensive Housing Needs Analysis, 393 the City Council’s Policy Priority Plan related to housing, and the Rice-Larpenteur Vision Plan, 7b RCA UPDATED Page 10 of 13