My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01312022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 01312022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2022 2:06:22 PM
Creation date
1/27/2022 2:05:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/31/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment D <br />Commissioner Arneson noted that the new tennis courts at Roseville Area High School are not <br />available to the public. Therefore,he agrees with the proposal to upgrade the courts at <br />Education Center. <br />Commissioner Ybarra reiterated the importance of timing during the project to ensure there is <br />limiteddisplacement forplayers of either sport. In addition, she noted that walking or biking access <br />to the courts should be considered. She alsorelayed that she has been paying attention to the “sounds <br />of pickleball” and does not find the noise offensive. She believes courts could potentially be placed <br />near homes. Lastly, she added that the current project will not address the future demand for <br />pickleball courts and she encouraged a long-term plan. <br />The Commission discussed the importance of the project timeline, potential lighting options at <br /> and possible future locations for additional pickleball courts. <br />Vice-Chair Dahlstrom moved to approve the recommendation of converting Evergreen <br />Park tennis courts into permanent pickleball courts <br />Education Center (Fairview) tennis court to the City Council. Commissioner Brown <br />seconds. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Arneson,Baggenstoss, Boulton, Brown, Dahlstrom, Lenhart, Ybarra and Hoag. <br />Nays: None. <br />Abstain: None. <br />5)REVIEW OF THE PARK NAMING PROCESS RELAREVIEW OF THE PARK NAMING PROCESS RELATED TO POSSIBLE RENAMING OF TED TO POSSIBLE RENAMING OF <br />POCAHONTAS PARK POCAHONTAS PARK <br />Staff provided a review of the process that has historically been used to name Roseville parks. <br />Process <br />Review of the city policy <br />Solicit suggestions <br />Discuss the history of the property <br />Discuss options for names <br />Formulate a recommendation for City Council consideration <br />Basic Policy Principles on Naming and Examples <br />Primary Principles <br />o Natural habitat <br />o Geographic location <br />o Non-descript terms <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.