CCP 01312022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ATTACHMENT A SECTION TWO: The following outlines revisions that could be considered as part of the Zoning Code update but are not necessarily needed to ensure consistency with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan: Identify incentives for incorporating sustainability measures Identify items related to racial equity and inclusion issues Address pronoun use throughout Title 10 Allow increased MDR density by conditional use, like what is allowed in the HDR districts Require covered parking for multi-family housing (For example: .5-1 stall / dwelling unit) Landscaping & Screening in All Districts (1011.03) – reduce tree requirements for multi-family residential (one tree/dwelling unit too many – multiple variances granted) Chapter 1017 (shoreland, wetland and storm water management) o Revise wetland setbacks to align with Rice Creek Watershed District regulations o Update shoreland ordinance to comply with state/DNR model ordinance – at a minimum we need to add language concerning Shoreland Alteration & Vegetation Alterations in Shoreland Areas, which was inadvertently deleted some time ago Definitions – what’s missing/needs revision? Refer to use tables of all zoning districts. Example: “Bed and Breakfast Establishment” definition needs revision so as not to be confused/conflicted with a rental home and/or rental bedroom that is otherwise governed under Title 9 of the City Code. May also need to add a lodging use and/or revise the lodging definition to address home rentals, including prohibition on commercial events within home rentals. Consider revising the Conditional Use requirement in the Community Mixed Use Districts regarding multi-family uses of 3 units/building or greater to a higher density threshold From the Council’s list of “Items for Future Scheduling”: o Consider increased green space requirements for MDR and HDR (caution: must consider balance between the need for green space, its impact on lower overall densities, density commitments made within the Comprehensive Plan, and the demand and affordability of housing units) o Are the current minimum residential lot sizes appropriate in all districts? o Screening requirements for solar arrays o Institutional zoning district amendments to address existing and potential range of housing types (i.e. convent, rectory, day care/Montessori schools, affordable housing) PROCESS: The City of Roseville’s Community Development Department seeks interested consultants to work collaboratively with City staff to accomplish the above list of Zoning Code Amendments. The intent under this Scope of Work is for the consultant to research and prepare the necessary code amendment language, with input and feedback provided by City staff, and for City staff to manage/oversee the process and advance such code amendments through the Planning Commission and City Council approval processes. Responses to this Scope of Work should include coordination with City staff for public engagement efforts, including online engagement should in-person meetings not be practical due to the ongoing pandemic. The estimated cost to complete the work outlined herein should be provided in two parts: 1) Section One, and 2) Section Two. The items outlined in Section One are to