Laserfiche WebLink
1 0±®¯®² « 3´¬¬ ±¸ <br />2 The applicant proposes to subdivide three undeveloped residential parcels generally located along <br />3 Victoria Street near Orchard Lane resulting in the nine-lot Victoria Shores plat for development of <br />4 single-family, detached homes with four lake-accesses shared by all nine homes. The proposed lots are <br />5 designed to conform to the requirements of the LDR zoning district, which regulates the property. The <br />6 applicant also seeks approval of the shared lake accesses among the future homeowners’ association <br />7 members as a conditional use. Illustrations and other information about the proposed development are <br />8 included with this RCA in Attachment C. <br />9 When exercising the “quasi-judicial” authority on subdivision and conditional use requests the role of <br />10 the City is to determine the facts associated with a particular proposal and apply those facts to the legal <br />11 standards contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In general, if the facts indicate the <br />12 application meets the relevant legal standards and will not compromise the public health, safety,and <br />13 general welfare, then the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City is, however, able to add <br />14 conditions to a subdivision and conditional use approval to ensure that potential impacts to parks, <br />15 schools, roads, storm sewers, and other public infrastructure on and around the subject property are <br />16 adequately addressed. Subdivisions may also be modified to promote the public health, safety, and <br />17 general welfare, and to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote <br />18 housing affordability for all levels. <br />19 0±¤«¨¬¨­ ±¸ 0« ³ <br />20 Roseville’s Development Review Committee (DRC) met on several occasions in early 2021 to review <br />21 the proposed subdivision plans. Some of the comments and feedback based on the DRC’s review of the <br />22 application are included in the analysis below, and the full comments offered in memos prepared by <br />23 DRC members are included with this RCA in Attachment E. <br />24 Proposed Lots <br />25 Lots zoned LDR in the Shoreland Management District have two different size requirements, depending <br />26 on whether they are riparian (i.e., directly adjacent to the lake) or non-riparian. The table below shows <br />27 how the proposed lots compare to the relevant requirements in City Code §1017.14.B.1 as they apply to <br />28 lots within 300 feet of Lake Owasso. <br /> Block 1, Lots 1-5 Block 2, Lots 1-2 Block 3, Lots 1-2 <br />Min. Min. <br />WidtWidtWidt <br />Width Area <br />Area Area Area <br />h h h <br />(ft) (sq ft) <br />(sq ft) (sq ft) (sq ft) <br />(ft)* (ft)* (ft)* <br />Riparian 100 15,000 <br />Non-riparian 85 9,350** 18,000 >85 >9,350 >12,000 <br />29 *per City Code, lot width is measured at the required front yard setback, 30 feet from the front lot line for <br />30 non-riparian lots and also at the OHWL for riparian lots. <br />31 **Ordinance 1606 adopted by the City Council on November 8, 2021 reduced the minimum lot size <br />32 requirement from 11,000 SF to 9,350 SF <br />33 All of the proposed lots meet or exceed the pertinent standardsand represent the “simple, regular <br />34 shapes” described as preferred in §1103.05 (Lot Standards). The proposed plat differs in two ways from <br />35 the initial proposal as reviewed by the Planning Commission in April 2021. One such difference is that <br />36 the lots in Block 1 are no longer riparian lots. As a response to the concerns raised during the April 7 <br />37 public hearing and the recommendation of the MnDNR during the subsequent Environmental <br />38 Assessment Worksheet (EAW) review, the developer has changed the proposal so these lots will not <br />39 reach the lakeshore as riparian lots. Instead of the five individual, private docks plus the one shared dock <br />7e RCA.docx <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />