CCP 01312022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

82 Ramsey County 83 The memo from the City Engineer indicates the following: 84 The proposed plans meet the County requirements. 85 The County recommends that no parking be posted on this stretch of Victoria Street. Because 86 Victoria Street is a County State Aid Highway, per State Aid requirements, to enact a no parking 87 zone the City Council would need to adopt a resolution formally establishing the parking 88 restriction. 89 Tree Preservation 90 The tree preservation and replacement requirements in §1011.04 of the City Code provide a way to 91 quantify the amount of tree material being removed for a given project and to calculate the resulting tree 92 replacement obligation. The calculation is included in Attachment C. At the time this RCA was 93 prepared, Roseville’s consulting forestercontinues toreview the tree preservation planand he has 94 recognized that many of the trees on the site are protected from removal by virtue of being within 95 existing wetland areas adjacent to the lake. The applicant’s preliminary calculation based on the 96 proposed development would not elicit the obligation to plant replacement trees, although Planning 97 Division staff and the consulting forester are continuing to validate the data. 98 Park Dedication 99 The memo from the Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation indicates the following: 100 This subdivision proposal elicits the park dedication requirement. Since the subject property includes 101 three existing residential parcels, City staff has determined that the proposed nine-lot plat represents a 102 net increase of six developable lots. As such, the City could accept a dedication of up to approximately 103 half an acre of park land (based on the requirement to dedicate up to 10% of the land of the 5.75-acre 104 development site) or a dedication of cash in lieu of land, or an equivalent combination of land and cash. 105 The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) reviewed the proposal at its meeting of March 2, 2021, 106 and recommended a dedication of cash in lieu of land to satisfy the park dedication requirement; based 107 on the 2021 park dedication fee of $4,250 per net residential unit, the total dedication would equal 108 $25,500. 109 #®£¨³¨® « 5²¤ ! «¸²¨² 110 The use of the proposed Outlot A as shared lake accesses for the future homeowners is identified in City 111 Code §1017.15.B (Controlled Accesses) of the Shoreland regulations as being allowed only as a 112 conditional use. Section 1009.02.C of the City Code establishes a mandate that the City make five 113 specific findings pertaining a proposed conditional use. Planning Division staff has reviewed the 114 application and offers the following draft findings. 115 1. The proposed use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan 116 does not speak directly to the proposed use or the subject property, but several shared accesses 117 already exist on Lake Owasso and Planning Division staff believes the use of residentially zoned 118 lakeshore land for residential lake access is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 119 2. The proposed use is not in conflict with any Regulating Maps or other adopted plans. The site is not 120 subject to any such regulating maps or other adopted plans. 121 3. The proposed use is not in conflict with any City Code requirements. No specific plans have yet been 122 presented, but any improvements tothe controlled access site will need to conform to all applicable 123 City Code requirements or receive variances to specific zoning provisions as may be necessary. 7e RCA.docx Page 4 of 7