My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01312022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 01312022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2022 2:06:22 PM
Creation date
1/27/2022 2:05:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/31/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />7.A concern was raised regarding the developer’s interest in any potential builders and it was <br />confirmed that the that the developer is not going to build homes directly but will sell lots to <br />builders who will build homes on the properties. <br />8.A concern was raised regarding the sidewalks in the area and the fact that it is potentially <br />difficult to reverse the area for both pedestrians and bicyclists. The developer confirmed that <br />there will take every step possible to continue the existing trail work and comply with city <br />requirements with regard to trails and sidewalks. <br />9.The concern was raised regarding tree removal and the site. Developer responded and <br />confirmed that truly minimal and that by individually grading sites rather than mass grading <br />the project pre removal can be mitigated. Additionally, tree protection for the trees that will <br />be kept on the property will be provided during grading which includes protecting the trees <br />and the root base during construction of the site paths. <br />10.Concern was raised regarding the wooded nature of an area and that is very important to the <br />community. The developer agrees completely that the wooded nature of the city is important <br />and that it will be the responsibility of builder Ann developer to clean up the debris and not <br />disturb any trees unnecessarily. <br />11.The question was raised about sewer and water being stubbed to the property and it was <br />confirmed that that is the intention of the developer. <br />12.Plans for stormwater management and drainage issues was raised by a constituent. The <br />developer responded that the engineers are working with the watershed district 2 ensure no <br />damage from runoff water will occur and that there will be a common infiltration system on <br />the property in a location to be determined. <br />13.Installation of sewer and water services is anticipated in the summer and fall of 2021 which <br />will result in the manage shutdown of Victoria St with County highway approval for any <br />shutdown. <br />14.A concern was raised with regard to the proposed last six and seven and whether they were <br />big enough for two separate lots. Additionally, one community member was very concerned <br />that both lots on their own were too small and solely designed to increase profit for the <br />developer and that two homes would not be in the character of the neighborhood. The <br />developer indicated they would look at that issue and make a determination as to the size and <br />advisability of two lots in that location. The developer has subsequently determined that one <br />lot is appropriate for that location rather than two. <br />15.A concern was raised with regard to how many homes would have to be removed for the <br />project. Developer confirmed that no homes are planned for removal. <br />Page 2 of 65 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.