CCP 01312022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RCA Attachment D surface going in and out each season and will cause a lot of wear and tear on that area of the lake. Ms. Ashley MacGregor, Little Bay Road Ms. MacGregor echoed all of the resident comments. She believed this is a thoughtful developer that is trying to check all of the boxes but what has to be remembered is that this is the chance the Planning Commission has to make a different choice. Once the development is in there is not much anyone can do if there are issues and problems. Now is the chance to decrease capacity on that side of the lake. Mr. Josh Kath Mr. Kath echoed a lot of the concerns that have been brought up. He wanted to draw attention to the City Code and that there is a deficiency because it is decades outdates. He thought the City is putting the cart before the horse if the City does not first address or consider some of those necessary or conversational points in the Code that should be discussed that these types of projects will have impacts on in regard to subdividing lots. He thought there was already a lot of shared easements on the lake, and he thought the City Code was lacking regulatory authority over those as well and those easements seem to be growing and expanding. Ms. Heidi Walz Ms. Walz wondered if the developer would be willing to do another tour before more of the general public was aware of the area in order for people to better grasp what is being proposed. Chair Kimble closed the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. Commission Deliberation Member Pribyl asked Mr. Lloyd for a follow up on the lots size, shape, and proportion. She thought some of it was dictated by Victoria and the wetland boundaries and some of it is to try to get direct water access for the five lots. Mr. Lloyd reviewed the zoning requirements of the lots with the Commission. Member McGehee asked if the City has an obligation to have anything subdivided. Mr. Lloyd indicated the role in the City reviewing a subdivision request falls into what is called the CityÓs quasi-judicial authority. With that authority, the City reviews a proposal against existing standards. Whatever State law might obligate of the City and whatever the City Codes allow or require and generally speaking, proposals that conform to the applicable requirements ought to be approved. They can certainly be approved with conditions to mitigate potential impacts that are identified by the Planning Commission. MOTION Member McGehee moved to table pending information on the new 2019 regulatory authority that has been published by the DNR and any other Page 13 of 65