CCP 01312022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A - Page 5 Staff attended the Indigenous Dance performance in Central Park to solicit feedback. Display boards about the issue were placedin City Hall. Target: 50 people Sufficient Engagement Will Have BeenAccomplishedWhen: A significant number of each of the stakeholder groups above have provided input (see “targets” above). Impacted groups such as neighbors, Roseville’s native community and the greater Roseville community is aware of the issue and conversation. IV. Analysis Parks and Recreation Commission Members shall review and analyze the data collected and make a recommendation to the City Council to either keep the name the same, change the name or engage in further conversation on the issue. If the commission recommends a name change, the City Council may ask the Parks and Recreation Commission to continue this process to recommend a new name to the city council. It is important to note that the City’sRacial Equity Narrative will be utilized in the analysis of the data and the provision of a recommendation. This process is not intended to be a simple “straw poll” on the issue. V. Implementation The proposed process consists of (completeditems italicized): PLANDEVELOPMENT o November 5, 2020 – Parks and Recreation Commission developed draft Engagement Plan. Agree that plan will continue to evolve as more information is learned. o January 2020 – Joint meeting with City Council to update on feedback received and seek feedback. INFORMATION GATHERING Commissioners heard from Shannon Geshik of the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council, a Roseville Resident and member of the Roseville Indian Education Parent Committee and Rosevilleresident. (See December Parks and Recreation Commission meeting minutes) Staff Spoke with Wayne Ducheneaux from the Native Governance Center. (Notes included in March Parks and Recreation Commission Packet)