Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 21, 2021 <br />Page7 <br />about these programs would be good because there is a variety of different sizes of <br />businesses represented at those programs. <br />Public Comment <br />Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment. <br />Ms. Donna Peterson <br />Ms. Peterson explained she was happy that the question has been asked about re­ <br />sources and what the City will have to put into carrying this forward. She was <br />one of the people on the Energy Action Team and has done a lot of work herself <br />on projects like this for her employments and knew things like this don't go for­ <br />ward without having money. She stated it was good to hear that the City is look­ <br />ing to get an intern to start on this process but on the other hand, an intern will not <br />have experience in trying to reach out in all of the ways needed for this to be suc­ <br />cessful. She thought it was important for Council to realize that moving forward <br />in this area is going to depend on making sure that there are some good resources, <br />resources beyond what Mr. Johnson can do, and people who have some experi­ <br />ence. <br />Mayor Roe thanked all that have been involved in this process. <br />Etten moved, Strahan seconded, adoption of the Roseville Energy Action Plan and <br />to Authorize the City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with <br />Xcel Energy. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Strahan, Groff, Willmus, Etten, and Roe. <br />Nays: None <br />c.Consideration of the Proposed "Midland Legacy Estate 3 rd Addition" Plat of <br />11 Lots for Single-Family, Detached Homes <br />Senior Planner Brian Lloyd briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the Request <br />for Council Action and related attachments dated June 21, 2021. <br />Councilmember Strahan indicated she did not have an opportunity to see if there <br />was a revised staff recommendation today, prior to the meeting, but in review of <br />the materials over the weekend, at that time the recommendation was to deny the <br />preliminary plat with an alternative plan to table the request. Given this additional <br />information, she wondered if the staff recommendation was to still deny or is to <br />table. <br />Mr. Lloyd explained staff recommends tabling. It is typical for staff to bring for­ <br />ward the Planning Commission's recommendation as the recommended action for <br />the City Council. Because there is quite a lot of promise in the revisions that have