My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 03072022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 03072022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2022 11:49:14 AM
Creation date
3/3/2022 11:49:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/7/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />38 b. Recombination: This type of platting alternative transfers a parcel of land from one <br />39 lot of record to an abutting lot. This type of platting alternative creates no new lots or <br />40 streets. The proposed recombination shall not cause any portion of the existing lots, <br />41 parcels, or improvements thereon, to be in violation of this Title or Title 10 (Zoning) <br />42 of this Code. <br />43 c. Corrections: This type of platting alternative is intended to correct a survey or legal <br />44 description of a parcel or lot that has been found to be inadequate to describe the <br />45 actual boundaries. This type of platting alternative creates no new lots or streets. The <br />46 proposed correction shall not cause any portion of the existing lots, parcels, or <br />47 improvements thereon, to be in violation of this Title or Title 10 (Zoning) of this <br />48 Code. <br />49 2. Applications: The owner of property on which a platting alternative is proposed shall file an <br />50 application for approval of the platting alternative by paying the fee set forth in Chapter 314 <br />51 of this Code and submitting a completed application form and supporting documents as set <br />52 forth on the application form. Complete applications shall be reviewed and acted upon by <br />53 the Development Review Committee, as established in Section 1002.06 of this Code. <br />54 3. Validation and Expiration: A platting alternative approval shall be validated by the applicant <br />55 through the filing of the approved platting alternative at the office of the Ramsey County <br />56 recorder or Registrar of Titles, as may be appropriate, within one year of the date of the <br />57 approval. Notwithstanding this time limitation, extensions of the time allowed for validation <br />58 of the approval may be granted; extension requests shall be submitted in writing to the <br />59 Community Development Department and shall identify the reason(s) why the extension is <br />60 necessary along with an anticipated timeline for validation of the approval. A platting <br />61 alternative approval shall automatically expire if the approval is not validated as described <br />62 herein. <br />63 C. Minor Plat <br />64 1.Purpose: The Minor Plat process may be used when all of the following criteria are present. <br />65 All other subdivision proposals that do not fall within the regulations listed herein shall be <br />66 submitted for the review by the Planning Commission and the approval of the City Council <br />67 in accordance with the Major Plat process established in this Chapter. <br />68 a.The proposal subdivides or consolidates existing lots of record resulting in three or <br />69 fewer lots. <br />70 b. The subject property is adequately served by public utilities and right-of-way, and no <br />71 further utility or right-of-way is necessary. <br />72 c. The anticipated development on the lot or lots resulting from the proposed subdivision <br />73 or consolidation is supported by the Comprehensive Plan land use designation <br />74 applicable to the subject property. <br />75 d. The existing or anticipated development on the lot or lots resulting from the proposed <br />76 subdivision or consolidation conforms, or is made to conform, to the zoning regulations <br />77 applicable to the subject property. <br />78 e. The proposed subdivision does not qualify for park dedication under the requirements <br />79 established in Section 1103.06 of this Title. <br />(Inserted language shown in underline, deleted language shown in strikethrough) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.