My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 08082022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 08082022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 11:49:41 AM
Creation date
8/11/2022 11:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/8/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Proposal Summary <br />2 The applicant proposes to subdivide the two existing residential parcels resulting in the seven-lot Brama <br />3 Vistas plat for development of three two-family, attached homes (also known as twin homes) to be <br />4 served by a shared driveway and the preservation of the existing home at 2994 Old Highway 8. The <br />5 proposed lots are designed to conform to the requirements of the LDR zoning district, which regulates <br />6 the property. Illustrations and other information about the proposed subdivision are included with this <br />7 RCA in Attachment C. <br />8 When exercising the “quasi-judicial” authority on subdivision requests the role of the City is to <br />9 determine the facts associated with a particular proposal and apply those facts to the legal standards <br />10 contained in the ordinance and relevant state law. In general, if the facts indicate the application meets <br />11 the relevant legal standards and will not compromise the public health, safety, and general welfare, then <br />12 the applicant is likely entitled to the approval. The City is, however, able to add conditions to a <br />13 subdivision approval to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to provide for the <br />14 orderly, economic, and safe development of land, and to promote housing affordability for all levels. <br />15 Although approval of the proposed plat would facilitate development of two-family homes, the two- <br />16 family homes themselves are not strictly germane to the quasi-judicial review of the preliminary plat. <br />17 Additional context may be helpful, however, because this is the first development proposal to include a <br />18 new duplex or twin home in the LDR district. The two-family housing type was established as a <br />19 permitted use in the LDR district in November 2021 as part of the first phase of the Zoning Code update <br />20 project, the purpose of which was to bring Roseville’s zoning regulations into alignment with the goals <br />21 and policies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Increasing the supply of “missing middle” housing like <br />22 this across the community is the focus of several of the comprehensive plan’s goals, and permitting two- <br />23 family homes by right in the LDR district is one of several Phase I zoning updates meant to achieve such <br />24 goals. <br />25 Preliminary Plat <br />26 Roseville’s Development Review Committee (DRC) met on several occasions in early 2022 to review <br />27 the proposed subdivision plans. Some of the comments and feedback based on the DRC’s review of the <br />28 application are included in the analysis below, and the full comments offered in memos prepared by <br />29 DRC members are included with this RCA in Attachment E. <br />30 Proposed Lots <br />31 The LDR district specifies two different size requirements for the lots in this plat, depending on whether <br />32 they are for the one-family detached home or the two-family attached homes. The table below shows <br />33 how the proposed lots compare to the relevant requirements in City Code §1004.09.B. <br /> Lot 1 Lots 2-7 <br />Min. Min. <br />Width Area <br />Width Area Width Area/Unit <br />(ft) (sq ft) <br />(ft) (sq ft) (ft) (sq ft) <br />Detached 85 9,350 115 15,375 <br />Attached 45* 5,500* >55 5,775 <br />34 * Per City Code, lot width and area per attached unit can be distributed <br />35 around the development site rather than contained in each lot. <br />36 All of the proposed lots meet or exceed the pertinent standards and all of the proposed lots have “simple, <br />37 regular shapes” described as preferred in §1103.05 (Lot Standards). <br />7b RCA.docx <br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.