My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 08082022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 08082022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 11:49:41 AM
Creation date
8/11/2022 11:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/8/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />wĻŭǒƌğƩtƌğƓƓźƓŭ/ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓaĻĻƷźƓŭ <br />aźƓǒƷĻƭΑĻķƓĻƭķğǤͲWǒƌǤЏͲЋЉЋЋ <br />tğŭĻЋ <br />42 5. Communications and Recognitions: <br />43 <br />44 a. From the Public: Public comment pertaining to general land use issues not on this <br />45 agenda, including the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. <br />46 <br />47 None. <br />48 <br />49 b. From the Commission or Staff: Information about assorted business not already on <br />50 this agenda, including a brief update on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update <br />51 process. <br />52 <br />53 None. <br />54 <br />55 6. Public Hearing <br />56 <br />57 a. Request for Preliminary Approval of a Major Plat to Subdivide Two Residential <br />58 Parcels into Six Lots for Two-Family, Attached Homes (Twin Homes), One Lot <br />59 for Retention of an Existing One-Family Detached Home, and One Outlot <br />60 (PF22-005) <br />61 Chair Kimble opened the public hearing for PF22-005 at approximately 6:35 p.m. and <br />62 reported on the purpose and process of a public hearing. She noted this will be before <br />th <br />63 the City Council at their July 25 meeting. <br />64 <br />65 City Planner Paschke summarized the request as detailed in the staff report dated July <br />66 6, 2022. <br />67 <br />68 Member Pribyl thanked Mr. Paschke for the presentation and for addressing some of <br />69 the neighborsÓ concerns raised in the emails sent. She indicated one email that is not <br />70 directly related to the plat but one she remembered seeing as a comment was the <br />71 possibility of lighting from this parcel onto other parcels. She asked Mr. Paschke to <br />72 review the City policy regarding lighting. <br />73 <br />74 Mr. Paschke did not know if there would be a restriction and did not know of any <br />75 street lights that would end up going in on a private street. He noted he has not seen <br />76 any plans for that. As it relates to the units themselves, the owners would be able to <br />77 light their yard the same as any other owner on their property. Typically the lighting <br />78 is shielded so it does not shine outside of the property. <br />79 <br />80 Mr. Tom Brama, 3009 Troseth Road, owner, addressed the Commission. He indicated <br />81 his concern is this is a very desirable area to live and it is hard for people to move into <br />82 the area. They felt that by offering Twinhomes the cost would be lowered to people of <br />83 getting into a desirable neighborhood where there is a mix of properties. He explained <br />84 this is not an out of the ordinary use of the property and is not changing the character <br />85 of the immediate neighborhood. <br />86 <br />87 Member McGehee wondered what would the size of the home pads be. <br />88 <br />Page 2 of 35 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.