Laserfiche WebLink
RCA Attachment D <br />unit family housing. There are already many multi-unit housing <br />complexes on County Rd C2, and Old Highway 8, including the <br />Edison complex that Roseville approved a couple of years ago <br />and which has been expanded to more units since the initial <br />approval. Foot traffic since this expansion has increased since <br />this expansion, so people obviously enjoy the green space <br />provided by this block. Sandcastle Park provides minimal <br />greenspace in this neighborhood and the Edison project cut <br />down a small forest of trees and did not preserve any of the <br />trees they committed to preserving when the project was <br />approved. Mr. Brama's project and the storm water proposal <br />and project further reduce the greenspace of the neighborhood. <br />The storm water proposal looks like a very extensive project to <br />manage water runoff in the area and only address his property, <br />not how the surrounding properties might be affected. It is hard <br />to tell from the storm water proposal, but it looks like the many <br />infiltration basins will be breeding grounds for mosquitoes <br />which will have to be managed with more chemicals being <br />applied that will affect our ground water. It looks like none of <br />the trees Mr. Brama had said he would save will be saved. Our <br />block is also known for a variety of wildlife such as fox, coyote, <br />deer, turkey, quail and pheasant. How can this massive storm <br />water proposal not disrupt the greenspace that is part of the <br />charm and attractiveness of our neighborhood? It looks like <br />one of the houses he had proposed to save, will be turned in to <br />a 2 family unit. <br /> <br />Of note, despite the fact that he promised to get all at the <br />meeting the storm water proposal, Mr. Brama only gave it to <br />me when I asked. We do not trust him to keep the <br />neighborhood informed about the details of this proposed plat <br />change and storm water proposal. <br /> <br />We would venture to say that a minimum of the neighborhood <br />would like to see this project be completed. <br /> <br />We ask you to vote against this proposed project when it is <br />presented to you as it does not fulfill the mission of retaining <br />the character of the neighborhood and that it will extensively <br />reduce greenspace. It is also difficult to tell from the proposed <br />storm water proposal that it will not adversely affect properties <br />on Old Highway 8 and on Troseth Road with water runoff. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Roger and Laurie Pastwa <br />2999 Troseth Rd. <br />2 <br />Page 16 of 35 <br /> <br />