My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 06062022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 06062022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 12:05:02 PM
Creation date
8/11/2022 12:04:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/6/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />June 2, 2022 <br />Roseville City Council <br />Att: Pat Trudgeon, City Manager <br />Dear Pat: <br />Thank you for taking the time to talk with us this week regarding the City of Roseville’s <br />requirements for business and liquor licensing. As you may be aware, we are seeking to open a <br />small business in Roseville and have been working with Laura Boyd from Alcohol Compliance <br />Services to review licensing options for our project, including current state and municipal <br />regulations and liquor code ordinances and amendment trends in the Twin Cities area. While many <br />city liquor codes have been in place for decades, in recent years there a few trends that have moved <br />city councils to consider updating their codes for economic considerations and to account for <br />changes in the way that people socialize and consume food and beverages over the years, <br />including: <br />1)Customer dining, drinking, and socializing trends have shifted, particularly with the arrival <br />of cocktail and taprooms in Minnesota. <br />2)The socially responsible model (based on price elasticity of demand) leads to higher-priced <br />alcohol and lower-priced food. <br />3)The current economics of higher-priced alcohol products quickly skews percentage food <br />sales ratio, even when guests eat a meal and have two alcoholic beverages. <br />4)When considering establishments such as our proposed venue, a lot of the revenue and real <br />estate of the venue is derived from, and devoted to, equipment and entertainment, so <br />requiring significantly higher percentages of food sales would be prohibitive to a small <br />business; only large chains or venues with a huge footprint could operate under that <br />business model. <br />Worthy of note is the unlevel playing field/public safety issue created with regard to lack of a food <br />requirement, maximum hours/time of alcohol consumption or other safeguards for taprooms and <br />cocktail rooms as measured against restaurant/food requirements for on-sale liquor licensees. <br />Further, the 2022 Omnibus Liquor Bill makes all Minnesota distillers eligible for a cocktail room, <br />irrespective of production levels. <br />We conducted a brief, baseline review of ten neighboring and potentially comparable city liquor <br />codes in the metro area, in particular those cities: with a large retail presence and regional shopping <br />malls and centers, considering proximity to Roseville, and similarly-sized cities to Roseville, <br />including Arden Hills, Shoreview, Maplewood, Stillwater, St. Louis Park, Minneapolis, <br />Minnetonka, Edina, Bloomington, and St. Paul. Note that this list is not meant to be all- <br />encompassing, include code nuances or possible code amendment language or options, or land- <br />use/zoning-related matters, but rather to give a snapshot of regulatory standings and recent trends <br />in liquor code amendments. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.