My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 08222022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 08222022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2022 10:00:56 AM
Creation date
8/18/2022 10:00:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/22/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />wĻŭǒƌğƩtƌğƓƓźƓŭ/ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓaĻĻƷźƓŭ <br />aźƓǒƷĻƭΑĻķƓĻƭķğǤͲWǒƌǤЏͲЋЉЋЋ <br />tğŭĻЎ <br />183 green space in the neighborhood. She thought Sand Castle Park is a very tiny area and <br />184 is not like the other City parks that grace the area on the other side and she thought <br />185 this area on the other side of Old Highway 8 is in many ways a legacy neighborhood <br />186 and is under assault and also under viewed by Roseville because it is on the other side <br />187 of 35W. She also spoke about the water issues going on in Roseville as a whole. <br />188 <br />189 Ms. Gundlach reviewed her discussion with the City Engineer regarding some of the <br />190 drainage issues in the area. <br />191 <br />192 Member McGehee indicated she did not particularly have an objection to the <br />193 subdivision of this lot. She noted she did have an objection regarding the initial split <br />194 of the lots at the City Council because it was envisioned them having twin homes but <br />195 not six of them and particularly not in the back yards. She considered seven twin <br />196 homes on the two parcels to raise the bar to multi-family. <br />197 <br />198 Member Bjorum understood Member McGeheeÓs point but he would disagree simply <br />199 based on the fact that the LDR allows for the lot widths and square footages that the <br />200 developer is proposing so regardless of how large the existing lots are, what is being <br />201 set in front of them is clearly within the limits of the Zoning Code and <br />202 Comprehensive Plan. <br />203 <br />204 Member McGehee agreed and reviewed what the Council envisioned the lots to be at <br />205 the time the lot was split. She noted she only raised these issues because they are <br />206 issues the City Council should think about because it was the Council that put these <br />207 things in place. She thought there was a lack of green space and she thought these <br />208 water issues are serious and she did not think these twin homes are affordable. She <br />209 noted these are issues that she would like carried forward to the City Council. She <br />210 would like, if at all possible, some kind of stipulation that these townhomes would be <br />211 sold as single, individual homes. <br />212 <br />213 Ms. Gundlach did not think it was within the land use authority to dictate whether or <br />214 not something is owner occupied or rental. She explained relating housing type and <br />215 affordability and missing middle, the reason the City opened up the two family or <br />216 duplex housing type or LDR District was because the Comprehensive Plan calls for a <br />217 need for missing middle housing and that does not necessarily mean the same thing as <br />218 affordable housing. Affordability is a function of supply and demand and income and <br />219 missing middle is two, three, four family dwelling units. Nobody disputes the <br />220 $450,000 or $500,000 that is not affordable, but when comparing that to the Enclave <br />221 Townhomes that are listed for $650,000 or the single-family homes at Midland <br />222 Legacy Estates that are listed for $850,000, those are one family dwellings that are <br />223 owner occupied. $450,000 is a little more in the middle for what people could expect <br />224 to pay for a single-family home. She explained affordability is a function of supply <br />225 and demand and the City has a system where of all the CityÓs residentially zoned land <br />226 for one hundred years, eighty some percent of it has been zoned only for single family <br />227 homes of lot sizes of eleven thousand square feet. That has caused affordability issues <br />228 coupled with land price, materials, costs and now interest rates. Owning a single- <br />229 family home, certainly new construction is unattainable for many so the idea behind <br />Page 23 of 50 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.