My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 08222022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 08222022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2022 10:00:56 AM
Creation date
8/18/2022 10:00:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/22/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />wĻŭǒƌğƩtƌğƓƓźƓŭ/ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓaĻĻƷźƓŭ <br />aźƓǒƷĻƭΑĻķƓĻƭķğǤͲWǒƌǤЏͲЋЉЋЋ <br />tğŭĻА <br />277 Member Pribyl agreed and noted she does not necessarily like the layout of this but <br />278 also do not feel that having twinhomes in the neighborhood with large lots ruins the <br />279 character of the neighborhood automatically. <br />280 <br />281 Ayes: 4 ayes <br />282 Nays: 1 nay (McGehee) <br />283 Motion carried. <br />284 <br />285 7. Other Business <br />286 <br />287 a. Discuss Phase Two Zoning Code Update Amendments <br />288 Mr. Jeff Miller of HKGi, summarized the information as detailed in the staff report <br />289 dated July 6, 2022. She asked for feedback regarding the four identified areas for <br />290 sustainability requirements. <br />291 <br />292 Mr. Miller made a presentation on Phase Two of the Zoning Code Update. <br />293 <br />294 Staff and the Commission discussed EV charging station requirements for different <br />295 size businesses. <br />296 <br />297 Ms. Gundlach indicated staff is looking for specific feedback from the Commission. <br />298 Staff is looking to see if the Commission is ok with the EV ready versus the EV <br />299 charging, the percentage and the overall number of parking that should trigger that <br />300 requirement. <br />301 <br />302 Chair Kimble indicated given this is new she would err on the conservative side and <br />303 say minimum of thirty parking stalls versus twenty and include if it is burdensome. <br />304 The City can always see how it goes and increase this if needed rather than imposing <br />305 something that is a little stricter. <br />306 <br />307 Member Pribyl agreed. She noted there are more and more electric vehicles out there <br />308 so there will be more demand from residents living in multi-family or people <br />309 shopping looking for EV charging stations. Getting something in the Zoning Code is <br />310 helpful and important and making this intermediate step makes sense. <br />311 <br />312 Member Bjorum thought it was also ok to say there needs to be some on day one but <br />313 to have additional down the road may be needed. He has found that some developers <br />314 will go more than EV ready just because they know it is coming down the line and <br />315 forcing the minimum really tells them to just do the whole setup. He knew that with a <br />316 lot of these things it demands a much bigger electrical feed to do these projects when <br />317 done but he thought that was anticipated on the front end and a lot less damaging to <br />318 anybody doing development work. He thought having the split is probably very <br />319 important. <br />320 <br />321 Member Pribyl indicated for new construction it is not as much as a cost and easier to <br />322 get them ready and to have electric service. <br />323 <br />Page 25 of 50 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.