HomeMy WebLinkAbout09262022Plus (1)
Mayor:Address:
Dan Roe2660 Civic Center Dr.
Roseville, MN 55113
Councilmembers:
Jason Etten
Phone:
City Council Agenda
Wayne Groff651-792-7000
Julie Strahan
Website:
Robert Willmus
6:00 p.m.
www.cityofroseville.com
Members of the public who wish speak
during public comment or an agenda
item during this meeting can
do so virtually by registering at:
www.cityofroseville.com/attendmeeting
1.
6:00 P.M.Roll Call
Voting & Seating Order: Groff, Willmus, Strahan, Etten, and Roe
2.
6:01 P.M.Pledge of Allegiance
3.
6:02 P.M.Approve Agenda
4.
6:03 P.M.Public Comment
5.
6:10 P.M.Recognitions and Donations
5.A.
Indigenous Peoples' Day Proclamation
Documents:
PROCLAMATION.PDF
5.B.
Accept Donation to the City of Roseville Parks and Recreation
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENT.PDF
6.
6:15 P.M.Items Removed from Consent Agenda
7.
Business Items
7.A.
6:20 P.M.Consider approval of On-Sale Wine and Beer Licenses for
Shake Shack located at 1630 County Rd B2
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENT.PDF
7.B.
6:30 P.M.Consider Preliminary 2023 Tax Levy, Budget and EDA Levy
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENTS.PDF
8.
Council Direction on Councilmember Initiated Agenda Items
9.
Approval of City Council Minutes
10.
7:10 P.M.Approve Consent Agenda
10.A.
AP-Approval of Payments
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENT.PDF
10.B.
Approve 1 Temporary Liquor License
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENT.PDF
10.C.
Approve General Purchases and Sale of Surplus Items in Excess of
$10,000
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENTS.PDF
10.D.
Accept Public Improvements Related to The Enclave at McCarrons Lake
Public Improvement Contract
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENTS.PDF
10.E.
Approve Resolution Granting a Partial Release of Public Improvements
Related to the Twin Lakes 3rd Addition Public Improvement Contract
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENTS.PDF
10.F.
Order Feasibility Report for the County Road B Reconstruction Project
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENTS.PDF
10.G.
Order Feasibility Report for the Fairview Signal Project
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENTS.PDF
10.H.
Approve Sanitary Sewer Easement and Encroachment Agreement at
Approve Sanitary Sewer Easement and Encroachment Agreement at
2808 Lakeview Avenue
Documents:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AND ATTACHMENTS.PDF
11.
7:15 P.M.Future Agenda Review, Communications, Reports, and
Announcements- Council and City Manager
12.
7:20 P.M.Adjourn
Indigenous Peoples’ Day
October 10, 2022
Whereas: For longer than any other people, Indigenous nations have lived upon the land
where our nation and City now stand; and
Whereas: Indigenous people have always made enduring contributions to all of our
communities through knowledge, experience, technology, science, arts, and culture; and
Whereas: American Indian people today face significant disparities that impact their safety,
health, wellbeing, education, vitality, and cultural preservation, and the City of Roseville
understands that in order to help combat these disparities, government entities, organizations,
and other public institutions should change their policies and practices to better reflect the
experiences of American Indian people and uplift our country’s Indigenous roots, history, and
contributions; and
Whereas: The idea of Indigenous Peoples Day was first proposed in 1977 by a delegation of
Native nations to the United Nations-sponsored International Conference on Discrimination
Against Indigenous Populations in the Americas; and
Whereas: In 1990, representatives from 120 Indigenous nations at the First Continental
Conference on 500 Years of Indian Resistance unanimously passed a resolution to transform
Columbus Day into an occasion to strengthen the process of continental unity and struggle
towards liberation, and thereby use the occasion to reveal a more accurate historical record; and
Whereas: The Twin Cities community has a strong history of over four decades of
American Indian activism, which the City celebrates and honors; and
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the City Council hereby declares that the City of Roseville
observes Indigenous Peoples Day on October 10, 2022.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Roseville
th
to be affixed this 26 day of September 2022.
________________________
Mayor Daniel J. Roe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.: 5.b
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Accept Donation to the City of Roseville Parks and Recreation
1 B ACKGROUND
2 Over the years, the City of Roseville has received many donations from citizens, program participantsand
3 affiliated groups. These gifts have been in the form of both materials and monies. When staff is notified of
4 a potential donation, they first make a determination of whether to recommend acceptance based on the
5 suitability of the item for the City. An acceptance request is then forwarded to the City Council.
6
7 Over the years, the Central Park Foundation has significantly contributed to many areas throughout Central
8 Park. Most recently, the Foundation contributed pathway lights to the Muriel Sahlin Arboretum. Following
9 the completion of that project, the Foundation has turned their attention toward improving the accessibility
10 at the arboretum.
11
12 Currently, the perimeter trails of the arboretum are paved and the center of the arboretum contains pavers in
13 the Celebration Walk. However, the majority of trails that run through the arboretum are not paved and
14 consist of a crushed granite gravel surface (Attachment A). These unpaved surfacesare difficult for
15 individuals with mobility issues to navigate, particularly those who use a walker, wheelchairor other
16 ambulatory assistance device to assist in their mobility.
17
18 The Muriel Sahlin Arboretum is an integral part of our parks system. In addition to one of our busiest daily-
19 use sites, it hosts weddings, family gatherings, photos and special events such as Taste of Rosefest.
20 Recently, the Ramsey County Master Gardner’s and University of Minnesota added “Healing Garden”
21 signage to highlight thedocumented positive impacts that time spent in natural spaces hason mental health.
22
23 The Central Park Foundation is proposing paving the unpaved trails in a combination of concrete and
24 bituminous (asphalt) surfacing. Currently the Central Park Foundation has committed to a contribution of at
25 least $100,000 for the project. Depending on the final design, the project could cost between $120,000 and
26 $200,000 to complete in 2022 dollars.
27
28 Any work beyond the committed $100,000 could be funded using previously received donations, additional
29 contributions by the Foundation and others,or could be reserved for a Phase 2, to be completedin
30 subsequent years.
31
32 Work is planned to begin this fall in early November to ensure 2022 pricing and accommodate the busy
Page 1 of 2
33 recreational use schedule of the site.
34
35 P OLICY O BJECTIVE
36 According to the US Census BureauandAmerican Community Survey 5-year Data, an estimated 1,671
37 Roseville residents have an ambulatory disability. Acceptance of this donation, and completion of this
38 project, is in alignment with the City’s goal of making all of our parks and facilitiesmore welcoming and
39 inclusive to individuals of all abilities.
40
41 The following is the City of Roseville's policy regarding the acceptance of donations:
42 Minnesota Statute requires all donations to be officially accepted by the City Council.
43 The staff will not solicit donations.
44 Donors will be informed that no conditions or promises of future favorable city action on their behalf
45 maybe attached to the gift.
46
47 B UDGET I MPLICATIONS
48 All project capital costs will be paid for utilizing donation funds.
49
50 The capital improvements will become the property of the City of Roseville as a gift and therefore there is
51 an associated maintenance and operation responsibility for the city.
52
53 Any future capital costs will be considered as part of the pathway and parking lot fund with an estimated
54 annual impact of $5,000 per year.
55
56 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
57 Based on the project’sconsistency with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the City’s community
58 aspirations and past practice of leveraging outside city funds to enhance the Parks and Recreation System,
59 staff recommends acceptance and recognition of the donations as presented.
60
61 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
62 Motion authorizing the attached resolution to accept the dation and thank the Roseville Central Park
63 Foundation.
Prepared by: Matthew Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director
Attachments: A. Resolution Accepting a Donation of Work to be Completed at the Central Park, Muriel Shalin
Arboretum
B. Muriel Sahlin Arboretum Trail Map with Surface Type Overlaid
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
** ** ** ** * * * * ** ** *
1Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
2Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held onthe26day of September, 2022,at
36:00 p.m.
4
5The following members were present: ; and and the following members were absent: .
6
7Member_____introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
8
9RESOLUTION NO.___________
10A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF WORK TO BE COMPLETED AT
11THE CENTRAL PARKMURIEL SAHLIN ARBORETUM
12
13WHEREAS, the City of Roseville is generally authorized to accept donations of real and
14personal property for the benefit of its residents pursuant toMinnesota Statutes Section 465.03
15and is specifically authorized to accept gifts for the benefit of its public recreational services
16pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.17;
17
18WHEREAS, the Roseville Central Park Foundationhas offered to donate to the City the
19laborand material costsassociated with the paving of the gravel pathways at the Muriel Shalin
20Arboretumin Central Park,in coordination with the direction of City staff,
21
22WHEREAS,the donation aligns withthe oa more
23physically and mentally well community andmaking our parks and open spaces more accessible
24to individuals of all ability levels,
25
26WHEREAS, the donation is contributed to the City for the benefit of its residents and
27public recreational services;and,
28
29WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donation offered.
30
31NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roseville City Council, on behalf of the City
32of Roseville, Minnesota, hereby accepts the gift of the donation describedherein.
33
34The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member ___
35and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following
36voted against the same:
37
38WHEREUPONsaid resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Attachment A
2785 Fairview Encroachment Agreement
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the
attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on
the ___ day of ______, 20__, with the original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this ___ day of ______, 20___.
Patrick Trudgeon, City Manager
(SEAL)
39
40
Attachment
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.:7.a
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Hold a Public Hearing to Approve/Denyan On-Sale Wine and 3.2% Liquor
License for Shake Shack Minnesota LLC located at 1630 County Road B2 West,
Roseville, MN 55113
1 B ACKGROUND
2 Under City Code, a public hearing is required to consider approving liquor licenses for the current calendar
3 year. The City has received applications for the following:
4
5 Shake Shack Minnesota LLC– On-Sale Wine and 3.2% Liquor License
6 Shake Shack Minnesota LLC– Outdoor Endorsement
7
8
9 P OLICY O BJECTIVE
10 The regulation of establishments that sell alcoholic beverages has been a long-standing practice by the
11 State and the City.
12 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
13 The revenue that is generated from the license fees is used to offset the cost of police compliance checks,
14 background investigations, enforcement of liquor laws, and license administration.
15 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
16 The applicant meets all requirements set forth under City Code. Staff recommends approval pending
17 completion of successful background checks and submittal of any outstanding items.
18 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
19 Motion to approve Shake Shack’s request for an On-Sale Wine and 3.2% Liquor License pending
20 completion of successful background checks and submittal of any outstanding items.
21
22
Prepared by: Katie Bruno, Deputy City Clerk
Attachments: A: Application from Shake Shack Minnesota LLC
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date:September 26, 2022
Item No.: 7.b
Department ApprovalCity Manager Approval
Item Description:Adopt a Preliminary 2023Tax Levy and Budget
1 B ACKGROUND
2 At the April 18, 2022City Council meeting, the Council established a general timeline for the 2023
3 budget process including the following key dates:
4
5
6
7 The next step in the2023Budget Process is to adopt a preliminary 2023Tax Levy and Budget.
8
9 State Statute requires all cities in excess of 2,500 in population, to adopt a preliminary tax levy by
10 September 30th for the upcoming fiscal year. Once the preliminary levy is adopted it can be lowered, but
11 not increased.Accompanying the preliminary tax levy, the City has also historically adopted a
12 preliminary Budget which establishes the need for a tax levy.
13
14 The adoption of a preliminary tax levy and budget does not preclude further review. As noted in the table
15 above, additional budget-related discussions will be held later this year leading up to the adoption of the
16 final 2023Tax Levy and Budget tentatively scheduled for December 5, 2022.
17
18
Page 1of 3
19 Under State Statutes, municipalities with an established Economic Development Authority (EDA) are
20 allowed to establish a separate property tax levy that is designated for economic development purposes.
21
22 State Statute requires the preliminary EDA levies to be adopted by September 30th for the upcoming
23 fiscal year. Once the preliminary levy is adopted it can be lowered, but not increased.The final EDA levy
24 is scheduled to be adopted on December 5, 2022.
25
26 2023 Recommended Tax Levy & Budget
27 The City Council received the 2023 City Manager Recommended Tax Levy and Budget on August 22,
28 2022. This was followed by a recommendation from the Finance Commission on September 19, 2022.
29 The information presented below refers to the City Manager recommended amounts as amended.
30
31 The 2023 Recommended Tax Levy is $26,606,754, an increase of $1,741,210 or 7.0%. The impact on
32 residents will vary depending on the property’s value and change in value relative to other properties in
33 the city. For comparison purposes staff provides what the impact of this levy will on the median valued
34 home in Roseville. According to Ramsey County, the median value of a Roseville single-family home
35 rose 13.2% from 2022 ($296,500) to 2023 ($335,400). For 2023, the median-valued home of $335,400
36 can expect to pay approximately $101.75 per month; which is an increase of $9.83 or 10.7%, per month
37 from 2022 taxes, based on latest market value data from Ramsey County. These impacts are slightly
38 higher from what was presented by the City Manager in August due to receiving more complete city-
39 wide valuation from Ramsey County.
40
41 This is independent of the impacts that will result from a lower EDA Levy. The combined effect of the
42 City and EDA levy (as recommended) is depicted in the table below.
43
2023 ESTIMATED Budget Impact on Median-Valued Home (monthly)
20222023$ Chg.% Chg.
Property Tax Levy: City$ 91.90$ 101.75 $ 9.85 10.7%
Property Tax Levy: EDA 1.79 1.71 (0.09)-5.1%
Combined Total$ 93.69$ 103.46 $ 9.76 10.4%
44
45
46 The overall 2023 City Manager Recommended Budget, excluding the EDA and after capital outlay
47 adjustment is $61,493,240, which is an increase of $3,122,971. This increase is the result of $1 million
48 investments in capital equipment and infrastructure; $1.6 million invested in personnel costs and other
49 inflationary costs. A reduction of $1,897,000 was made in the utility funds capital outlay expenditures
50 since the presentation of the budget in August. More details on specific changes are noted in the City
51 Manager’s Budget memo which is included in Attachment E.
52
53 At the September 19, 2022 City Council meeting, the Finance Commission presented a recommendation
54 to request that the property tax levy increase be lowered to 6 or 5% by using reserves.
55
56 Attachment H shows estimated impacts on various valued homesteaded single family residential
57 properties.
58
59 A summary and reconciliation of the 2023 Recommended Tax Levy & Tax-Supported Budget is included
60 in Attachment F along with the detailed 2023 Budget. This budget and reconciliation reflects the
61 $1,897,000 in reduced capital outlay expenditures in the Water, Sewer, and Storm Utility Funds that was
Page 2 of 3
62 made since the August presentation.
63
64 On September 19, 2022, the EDA board approved a 2023 preliminary EDA levy of $411,505. The
65 Council is now asked to formally adopt the 2023preliminary EDA Levy by resolution, which is included
66 in Attachment D.
67 P OLICY O BJECTIVE
68 Adopting a preliminary budget and tax levy is required under MN State Statutes.
69 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
70 See above and attached information.
71 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
72 Staff Recommends the Council adopt the preliminary 2023 Tax Levy and Budget as outlined in thie report
73 and in the attached resolutions.
74 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
75 The Council is asked to take the following separate actions:
76 a) Motion to approve the attached Resolution adopting the 2023 Preliminary Tax Levy
77 b) Motion to approve the attached Resolution adopting the 2023 Prelimnary Debt Levy
78 c) Motion to approve the attached Resolution adopting the 2023 Preliminary Budget
79 d) Motion to approve the attached Resolution adopting the 2023 Preliminary EDA Tax Levy
80
Prepared by: Michelle Pietrick, Finance Director
Attachments: A: Resolution to adopt the 2023 Preliminary Tax Levy, with an alternate
B: Resolution to adopt the 2023 Preliminary Debt Levy
C: Resolution to adopt the 2023 Preliminary Budget, with an alternate
D: Resolution to adopt the 2023 Preliminary EDA Tax Levy
E: City Manager Recommended Tax Levy & Budget Information Package excerpts (from August 22,
2022 City Council meeting)
F: 2023 Budget Summaries and Reconciliation of Budget changes between 2022 and 2023
G: Citizen Budget Comments
H: Estimated Tax Impacts to Residential Properties based on various valuations
81
Page 3 of 3
Attachment A
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
* * * * * * * * * * *
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 26th day of September, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.
The following members were present: and , and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION SUBMITTING THE PRELIMINARY PROPERTY TAX LEVY
ON REAL ESTATE TO THE RAMSEY COUNTY AUDITOR
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF 2023
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, as
follows:
The City of Roseville is submitting the following tax levy on real estate within the corporate limits of the
City to the County Auditor in compliance with the Minnesota State Statutes.
PurposeAmount
Programs & Services$ 20,078,039
Capital 4,315,000
Debt Service 2,213,715
Total26,606,754$
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon a
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and , and the following voted
against the same:
WHEREUPON, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
State of Minnesota)
) SS
County of Ramsey)
.
Page 1 of 8
Attachment A
I, undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, State
of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of
minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 26th of September, 2022 with the original
thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 26th day of September, 2022.
___________________________
Patrick Trudgeon
City Manager
Seal
Page 2 of 8
Attachment B
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
* * * * * * * * * * *
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 26th day of September, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
, and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ______________
RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO
ADJUST THE APPROVED TAX LEVY FOR 2023 BONDED DEBT
WHEREAS, the City will be required to make debt service payments on General Obligation Debt in
2023; and
WHEREAS, there are reserve funds sufficient to partially reduce the originally scheduled levy for
General Obligation Series 2009A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that
The Ramsey County Auditor is directed to change the 2023 tax levy for General Improvement Debt by
$111,510 from that which was originally scheduled upon the issuance of the bonds as follows:
OriginallyAdditions
Scheduledor Certified
Bond IssueLevy AmountReductionsDebt Levy
GO Housing Imp 2009A111,510.00(111,510.00) -
GO 2012A1,442,385.00 - 1,442,385.00
GO 2020A771,330.00 - 771,330.00
Total$ 2,325,225.00$ (111,510.00)$ 2,213,715.00
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon
a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Page 3 of 8
Attachment B
WHEREUPON, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
I, undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, State
of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefullycompared the attached and foregoing extract of
minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of September, 2022, with the
original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 26th day of September, 2022.
___________________________
Patrick Trudgeon
City Manager
Seal
Page 4 of 8
Attachment C
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
* * * * * * * * * * *
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 26th day of September, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ______________
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY 2023ANNUAL BUDGET
FOR THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, as
follows:
The City of Roseville's Budget for 2023 in the amount of $61,493,240, of which $37,761,816 is
designated for the property tax-supported programs, be hereby accepted and approved
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon
a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
WHEREUPON, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
State of Minnesota)
) SS
County of Ramsey)
Page 5 of 8
Attachment C
I, undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, State
of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of
minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of September, 2022, with the
original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 26th day of September, 2022.
___________________________
Patrick Trudgeon
City Manager
Seal
Page 6 of 8
Attachment D
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 26th day of September, 2022, at 6:00 p.m.
The following members were present
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO _____
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY, FOR THE BENEFIT
OF THE ROSEVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ON REAL ESTATE
TO THE RAMSEY COUNTY AUDITOR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF 2023
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Roseville,
Minnesota, as follows:
The request of the Economic Development Authority for a special levy per Minnesota Statutes
Section 469.107, is hereby approved in the amount of $411,505 to be collected in 2023 for the purposes
of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081. This amount does not exceed 0.01813 percent of
estimated market value of the city as required under Section 469.107.
The motion for the adoption of the forgoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor:
and the following voted against:
WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
State of Minnesota)
) SS
County of Ramsey)
Page 7 of 8
Attachment D
I, undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, State
of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of
minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of September, 2022 with the
original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 26th day of September, 2022.
___________________________
Patrick Trudgeon
City Manager
Seal
Page 8 of 8
Attachment E
City Manager 2023 BudgetMemo
City Manager Patrick Trudgeon
City of Roseville
8/22/2022
Attachment E
Administration Department
Memo
To:Roseville City Council
cc: Roseville Department Heads
From: Patrick Trudgeon, City Manager
Date:August 22, 2022
Re: City Manager 2023 P
roposed Budget
2 I am pleased to present my proposed 2023 City of Roseville budget. I have approached the
3 creation of the 2023 budget mindful of the state of the economy and the financial challenges that
4 residents and businesses are facing. As a result of the current economy, the city budget is facing
5 the largestinflationary impact in decades.
6
7 As I mentioned in previous budget messages, Roseville is a complex citythat serves a larger
8 population than its actual residents. As a regional commercial and retail destination, Roseville has
9 35,000 persons journey to Roseville daily for their work and up to 80,000 people traveling through
10 the city every 24 hours on our numerous State and County Roads. These visitors use Roseville’s
11 roads, parks, and cityservices. We need to respond to medical and law enforcement issues
12 regardless of whether they are Roseville residents or not. All this activity requires the City to
13 allocate additional resources above what is needed for a community of Roseville’s size.
14
15 The 2023 budget continues previous budget proposals that addressed increasing demands on city
16 services and maintains investment in our programs, services, and employees in a responsible and
17 sustainable manner.
18
19 In the lastdecade, the City of Roseville hasstabilizedour funding for capital needs. We now have
20 sufficient resources in place for the next 13 years for most of our infrastructure and equipment
21 funds. We will need to continue to work on several capital fundsin the near term, namely the
22 Police Equipment and Vehicle Fund and the Park and Recreation Vehicle and Equipment Fund to
23 ensure sufficient funding for capital replacement in the future.
24
25 Before providing greater details about my proposed 2023 City Budget, I would like to provide
26 some general context regarding the creation of the budget.
27
28 In March, the City Manager and Department Heads met to discuss organizational budget
29 priorities. The Department Heads identified 6 organizational priorities that needed to be addressed
30 as part of the 2023 budget. These prioritiescenteredaround 1) People (Employees); 2) Equity and
31 Inclusion; 3) Environmental Sustainability; 4) Community Success; 5) Engagement; and 6)
32 Infrastructure. A summary of these organizational priorities is attached to this document. While
Attachment E
33 every priority could not be totally accommodated as part of the 2023 budget, they were used to
34 help frame important components of the budget proposal.
35
36 The impact of inflation is being felt across department budgets. The City is experiencing higher
37 operational costs due to price spikes in supplies such as fuel and facing higher costs (and longer
38 waiting periods) for the acquisition of replacement capital items, these inflationary costs have been
39 factored into the proposed City Budget and I have employed strategies when possible to mitigate
40 its effecton the property tax levy. Howeverit should be noted that factoring out new or expanded
41 programs, services, or personnel, this budget is experiencing a much higher cost to deliver the
42 existing programs and services than a typical budget year.
43
44 Ona related note is the upward pressure on employee wages. With Minnesota’s low
45 unemployment rate, recruiting and retaining employees continue to be extremely challenging for
46 both public and private employers. As a result, employers have had to raise wages in order to
47 attract applicants for open positions. This budget begins to address this fact with both seasonal
48 and regular employees. A cost of living adjustment (COLA) it typically given to employees each
49 year, typically ranging for 0 to 3%, to keep pace with inflation and remain competitive with other
50 employers. Our typical benchmarks for determining the amount of COLA for non-union
51 employees, are the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Minneapolis/St. Paul and the Employment
52 Cost Index (ECI) for State and Local Government Workers. With inflation at a 40-year high, the
53 Minneapolis/St. Paul CPI in July 2022 was 8.2% higher than July 2021. The ECI for state and
54 local government workers wages only went up 3.2% compared to June 2021. The lower ECI rate
55 is probably reflective of the government’sannual budget process that does not allow the ability to
56 quickly adjust wage rates as private industry are able to do. With all that in mind, this budget is
57 proposing a COLA of 3% for non-union employees which will match what union employees will
58 be receiving as part of their collective bargaining agreements.
59
60 Finally a note about the City’s ongoing equity work. As this document primarily outlines large
61 cost drivers and new costs that are part of the proposed budget, there will not be much description
62 of the City’s equity work. However, our equity work continues to be a priority for the City. The
63 2022 budget included a new investment of $126,000 levy dollars to go toward our equity work.
64 The 2023 budget continues funding equity work at the amount of $135,000. For 2023, the
65 funding will go towards the following work:
66
67 Diversity, Equity, Inclusion (DEI) Training
68 for Staff and Leadership $50,000
69 Juneteenth Event Support$ 5,000
70 Translation Services$10,000
71 Software for Engagement Activities (e.g.Envisio) $30,000
72 Youth Equity and Engagement $10,000
73 Recruitment initiatives/other expenses $30,000
74 $135,000
75
76 It should be noted these are expenses for the City’s general equity work. In the future, it is planned
77 that additional costs for department specific equity work will be included within the department
78 budgets.
79
Attachment E
80 The following pages outlinethe proposed 2023 budget and its financial impact. They also provide
81 details of my budget prioritiesand recommendations for new spending.
82
83 The proposed 2023 budget totals $63,390,240 and represents about an 8.6%increase from 2022
84 due to higher personnel and supply costs as well as increased capital equipment purchases.
85
86 Below is a chart showing how the 2023 budget is allocated to different categories. Personnel
87 Services comprise the largest amount of the budget followed by Other Services and Charges and
88 Capital Outlay.
89
90 Figure 1
91
92 Traditionally, the city budget is divided into two categories:Property Tax-Supported and Fee-
93 Supported. It is important to note that there is fee revenue for items in the Property Tax Supported
94 portionof the budget. However, the single-largestfunding source does come from property taxes.
95 Below is a table showing the breakdown between property tax levyand fee revenuesfor major
96 city functions in the 2023 budget.
97
Budget Funding Sources
ProgramProperty+/- OtherTotal
FunctionRevenueTaxesSourcesSources
Police$ 1,528,900$ 8,872,638$ 514,867$ 10,916,405
Fire 1,249,000 4,142,903 (496,860) 4,895,043
Parks & Recreation 3,225,010 5,713,041 801,760 9,739,811
Public Works 1,814,818 4,204,874 1,273,961 7,293,653
Administrative Services 937,599 2,786,621 509,343 4,233,563
Information Technology 693,864 110,677 102,000 906,541
General Facilities - 776,000 492,400 1,268,400
Water, Sewer, Storm 16,009,929 - 2,075,055 18,084,984
Other 6,772,490 - (720,650) 6,051,840
Total $ 32,231,610$ 26,606,754$ 4,551,876$ 63,390,240
* Other Sources include: license center fees, building permit fees, revenues from regional
collaborations, interest earnings, and use of reserves. Negative balances in Other Sources
category depicts funds set aside for future capital replacements.
98
99 Figure 2
Attachment E
100 The 2023Property Tax-Supported budget is$37,761,816, an11.5% increase. 53% of the costs of
101 the Property Tax-Supported budget is for Personnel Services followed by 21% used for Capital
102 Outlays as shown in the chart below.
103
104
105 Figure 3
106 The 2023Fee-SupportedBudget is $25,628,424. The largest category, Other Services and
107 Charges, haspayments to St. Paul Regional Water for water chargesand to Metropolitan Council
108 for sanitary sewer charges.
109
110
111 Figure 4
112
Attachment E
113 Likeprevious budgets, most fundsare used for operational needsas depicted below:
114
Budget Funding Uses
Princ & IntTotal
FunctionOperationsCapitalon DebtUses
Police$ 10,408,405$ 508,000 $ -$ 10,916,405
Fire 4,030,839 221,300 642,904 4,895,043
Parks & Recreation 6,173,500 1,995,500 1,570,811 9,739,811
Public Works 3,612,348 3,681,305 - 7,293,653
Administrative Services 3,783,163 450,400 - 4,233,563
Information Technology 857,141 49,400 - 906,541
General Facilities - 1,268,400 - 1,268,400
Water, Sewer, Storm 13,512,984 4,572,000 - 18,084,984
Other 6,049,540 2,300 - 6,051,840
Total$ 48,427,920$ 12,748,605$ 2,213,715$ 63,390,240
** Other Funding Uses Include: license center, planning & inspections, TIF and others
115
116 Figure 5
117
118 City Manager 2023Budget Strategies
119
120 My approach tothe 2023 budget is centered onthree main strategies.
121
122 1) Investment in infrastructure
123 2) Investment to maintain city programs and workforce
124 3) Strategic use of financialreserves and grant funding
125 As a result of these priorities, I am proposing a total property tax levy increase of $1,741,210; a
126 7% levy increase over 2022. The median-valued Roseville home increased in value from
127 $296,500 to $335,400 or an estimated 13.2%value increase over last year. This increase results in
128 a levy increase of approximately $86 from last year ($7.18/month) for the median valued home.
129
130 The next two pages are a summary of the proposed 2023 City Manager Budget followed by
131 detailed information about the specifics of my identified funding strategies.
132
Attachment E
133 Summary of City Manager Proposed 2023 City of Roseville Budget
134
135 Proposed 2023 Budget Amount
136 Property Tax-Supported $37,761,816
137 Fee-Supported $25,628,424
138 Total $63,390,240
139
140 Proposed 2023 Budget by Category
141 Personnel Services $25,794,594
142 Supplies and Materials $ 1,863,325
143 Other Services and Charges $19,864,301
144 Capital Outlay $12,748,605
145 Debt Service $ 2,213,715
146 TIF $ 905,700
147 Total $63,390,240
148
149 Proposed 2023Tax Levy Summary
150 Operations $20,078,039
151 Capital$ 4,315,000
152 Debt $ 2,213,715
153 Total $26,606,754
154
155 Summary of Tax Levy Changes in 2023Budget
156 Investment in Infrastructure $ 110,000
157 Investment to Maintain City Programs & Workforce $1,631,210
158
159
160 New Levy Dollar Impact Total $1,741,210
161
162 Proposed Levy Increase % 7.00%
163 Monthly Cost Impact on Median-Value Home ($335,400) $7.18
164 Annual Cost Impact on Median-Value Home ($335,400) $86.16
165
166
167
Attachment E
168 Investment in Infrastructure
169 Police Vehicle Equipment Fund ($200,000 of new tax levy)
170 As part of building tax levy support to pay for the addition of 6 firefighters funded by the SAFER
171 grant in 2021, $200,000 of new tax levy support was included in the 2022 budget and directed to
172 the Police Vehicle and Equipment Fund to stabilize the long-term funding for identified capital
173 needs for the Police Department. In continuation of that plan, an additional $200,000 of new tax
174 levy for the Police Vehicle and Equipment Fund is being included in the 2023 budget. As a result,
175 the Police Vehicle and Equipment Fund will have sufficient funding through 2035. Starting in
176 2024, the $400,000 of levy support going into the Police Vehicle and Equipment Fund will be
177 transferred to the operating budget to pay for the 6 grant-funded firefighters.
178
179 Admin Equipment Fund ($10,000 of new tax levy)
180 A small adjustment with the addition of $10,000 of new tax levy to the Administration Equipment
181 Fund is included in the 2023 budget. This addition will provide sufficient funding for the fund for
182 the next 20 years.
183
184 Finance Equipment Fund ($10,000 of new tax levy)
185 A small adjustment with the addition of $10,000 of new tax levy to the Finance Equipment Fund
186 is included in the 2023 budget. As the deficit is small and the fund’s capital needs are not great,
187 beyond the need for new financial software every 10-15 years, staff finds it acceptable tohave the
188 fund in a deficit in the near term. With the addition of $10,000 of tax levy, the Finance Equipment
189 Fund will have a positive balance by 2029.
190
191 IT Fund (Reduction of $100,000 of the existing tax levy)
192 An analysis of the IT Fund demonstrated that the tax levy support can be reduced by $100,000 in
193 order to offset other needed tax levy increases. Even with this reduction, there will be sufficient
194 balances to pay for the planned capital expenditures for the next 20 years.
195
196 Central Services Fund (Reduction of $10,000 of the existing tax levy)
197 An analysis of the Central Services Fund demonstrated that the tax levy support can be reduced by
198 $10,000 in order to offset other needed tax levy increases. Even with this reduction, there will be
199 sufficient balances to pay for the planned capital expenditures for the next 20 years.
200
201 Total new levy costs for investing in city capital infrastructure funds in City Manager’s proposed
202 2023budget:
203
Investment in Infrastructure
New Tax Levy Support
Capital Improvement Program Funds
Police Vehicle Equipment Fund $ 200,000
Admin Equipment Fund $ 10,000
Finance Equipment Fund $ 10,000
IT Fund $ (100,000)
Central Services Fund $ (10,000)
Total New Tax Levy Support$ 110,000
204
Attachment E
205
206 Investmentto Maintain City Programs and
207 Workforce
208
209 Reclassification of personnel
210
211 Reclassification of Detective to Detective Sergeant ($16,667)
212 The previous Detective Sergeant position was moved to the Community Action Team in 2021.
213 After a year of this arrangement, it has been determined that a Detective Sergeant Position in
214 Investigations is needed. An existing Detective position will be reclassified to a Detective
215 Sergeant position. There will not be an increase in police department personnel as a result of this
216 adjustment. The new cost represents the pay differential between detective and sergeant.
217
218 Reclassification of Parks Maintenance position from ¾ to FT
219 Given the increase in parks and workload, the current ¾ FTE Parks Maintenance position will be
220 reclassified as 1.0 FTE position. The new cost represents going from 1560 hours to 2080 hours
221 annually.
222
223 Reclassification of Digital Social Media Specialist from ¾ to FT ($42,130 total; $20,390 of new
224 tax levy support and $21,740 of Communications Fund balance)
225 As part of the communications team reorganization, a limited term Digital Media Specialist
226 position was created in 2021 and funded in the 2022 budget. The position has proved valuable as
227 part of the Community Relations team and there is a need to make this position full-time as we
228 continue to expand our engagement and outreach efforts. The new cost represents going from
229 1560 hours to 2080 hours annually.
230
231 Reclassification of Finance Accounting Tech from ½ to FT
232 The current part-time Finance Department Accounting Tech position manages the account
233 payable functions for the city. As the demands for the services of this position continue to grow,
234 there is additional need to have this position full-time to assist in the payroll process and other
235 Finance Department functions. The new cost represents going from 1040 hours to 2080 hours
236 annually.
237
238 Reclassification of PD Senior Department Assistant ($1,700 new tax levy support)
239 After a review of job duties for this position, an adjustment is being made to the compensation for
240 this position in the 2023 budget. The new cost represents the cost to make the adjustment.
241
242 Reclassification of Volunteer Coordinator ($1,845 new tax levy support)
243 After a review of job duties for this position, an adjustment is being made to the compensation for
244 this position in the 2023 budget. The new cost represents the cost to make the adjustment.
245
246
247
Attachment E
248 Reclassification of Engineering Project Coordinator($2,690 new tax levy support)
249 After a review of job duties for this position, an adjustment is being made to the compensation for
250 this position in the 2023 budget. The new cost represents the cost to make the adjustment.
251
252 Reclassification of Code Enforcement Officer/Building Inspector/Building Coordinator ($8,622
253 Community Dev. Fund. No tax levy impact)
254 After a review of job duties and need for the current staffing in Community Development, one
255 code enforcement officer position will be eliminated, the vacant building inspector position
256 included in the 2022 budget will be repurposed to a Building Coordinator position. The new cost
257 represents the cost to make the adjustment.
258
259 New personnel
260 New School Resource Officer – Roseville Area Schools ($40,000)
261 In May of 2022, the City entered into a contract with Roseville Area School District to allocate a
262 second School Resource Officer (SRO) to serve the RAS Middle and Elementary Schools. The
nd
263 Roseville Area School District will be paying for 2/3 of the costs for the 2SRO position with the
nd
264 city covering the remaining costs. The new cost represents the city costs for the 2 SRO position.
265 Please note that for the 2023 budget, it is proposed that the city costs be covered by ARPA funds.
266 (See below). This cost will need to eventually be covered by the city tax levy.
267
268 New Police Department Cadet position ($45,210)
269 Like other agencies, the Roseville Police Department continues to struggle with recruitment and
270 retention. In order to not be so reliant on the applicant pool, this budget proposes to convert one of
nd
271 the existing Community Service Officer (CSO) position to a 2Police Cadet. Due to the higher
nd
272 pay and regular hours, the creation of the 2 Cadet position will allow us to retain existing CSOs
273 for a longer period of time until they are eligible to become a police officer. This will also allow
274 the city to attract new recruits who are working on completing their training to become a police
275 officer. The new cost represents the amount needed to fund the position net of the elimination of
276 one CSO position. With this change, the PD will be authorized for 2 CSOs and 2 Cadets.
277
278 New Fire Department Cadet position ($21,450)
279 As part of the 2022 budget, a Fire Department Cadet position was created, based on the Police
280 Department model. While the Fire Departments recruitment and retention are not as challenging
281 as the Police Department’s, it is important to grow the pool of applicants, especially female and
282 BIPOC candidates, to better ensure the Fire Department better reflects the community. The new
st
283 cost represents the amount needed to fund the2nd positionand the full-year cost for the 1 cadet
284 position.
285
286 New Sustainability Specialist ($33,443 new levy support)
287 The Public Works Department currently has a Sustainability Intern position that helps the city
288 with its various environmental and sustainability initiatives. As the city continues to make
289 environmental sustainability a top priority and looks to do more in the future, this budget creates a
290 full-time Sustainability Specialist position. The new cost represents the amount needed to fund the
291 position. It should be noted that the position will be funded through new tax levy ($33,433) and
292 the remaining 70% of the costs be paid from the community development fund and recycling
293 fund.
294
Attachment E
295 Compensation Adjustments
296
297 Employee Step Increases ($419,256 new tax levy support)
298 As part of the city’s compensation plan, non-union employees that meet work goals and provide
299 satisfactory work receive wage increases based on a 7-step grid. Union employees also receive
300 step increases in a similar manner, with each contract providing for a different step system. The
301 new cost represents the tax levy needed to cover the expected step increases in 2023 for staff.
302
303 Employee COLA (3%) $452,923 new tax levy support)
304 Current union contracts have cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) of 3% in 2023 for union
305 employees which is built into the 2023 budget. This budget also has incorporated a 3% COLA for
306 non-union staff as a matter of parity and in recognition of the high inflation rate the public is
307 facing. The new cost represents the cost to provide the 3% COLA to all city employees. It should
308 be noted that of the total cost increaseof $598,223 for the COLAs, $452,923 will consist of new
309 tax levy dollars.
310
311
312 Increase Park and Rec Seasonal Pay ($154,872 new tax levy support)
313 The City has not raised the hourly rate for Park and Recreation seasonals for many years. The
314 current pay, averaging $11/hour, lags behind other employers and as a result, the city has difficulty
315 in recruiting and retaining seasonals. The 2023 budget increases seasonal pay to $14/hour. The
316 new cost represents the cost to make the adjustment.
317
318 Police Intern Pay ($6,600 new tax levy support)
319 Similar to other positions, the wage for Roseville Police Department intern position needs to have
320 a wage increase to stay competitive to recruit candidates. We have found the paid intern position
321 a helpful way to help our recruitment efforts. The new cost represents the cost to make the wage
322 adjustment.
323
324 FD Advanced Life Support Pay ($70,141 new tax levy support)
325 In 2021, the City Council authorized advanced life support as part of the first-responder response
326 for Roseville Fire Department. In recognition of the more advanced skills our firefighters will
327 need to provide ALS services, the paramedic position was created. The paramedic position due to
328 the advanced work theyperform, will receive higher pay than a firefighter. The new cost
329 represents the wage differential between firefighters and 9 paramedics.
330
331 Inflationary Costs for Supplies, Operations, and Contractual Services
332 The 2023 City Budget incorporates inflationary costs for supplies, operations, and contractual
333 services. Some examples are body cam software support, dispatching services, utility costs for
334 city facilities, equity efforts, and NYFS contract costs. It should be noted that the increase in fuel
335 costs have been factored out of this line item as I propose to utilize the Cash Reserve Fund to pay
336 for any fuel costs above the normally budgeted line items in each department. The total net cost to
337 cover the inflationary increase for supplies, operations, and contractualservices is $310,693.
338
339 Total new levy costs for maintaining programs and investing in the city workforce included in
340 City Manager’s proposed 2023 budget is on the following page.
341
Attachment E
342
343
344
Investment to Maintain City Programs and Workforce
New Tax Levy Support
Reclassification of personnel
Reclassification of Detective to Detective Sergeant $ 16,667
Reclassification of Parks Maintenance position from ¾ to FT$ 20,480
Reclassification of Digital Social Media Specialist from ¾ to FT $ 20,390
Reclassification of Accounting Tech from ½ to FT $ 52,850
Reclassification of PD Department Assistant $ 1,700
Reclassification of Volunteer Coordinator $ 1,845
Reclassification of Engineering Project Cooridinator $ 2,690
Reclassification of Code Enforcement
Officer/Building Inspector/Building Cooridinator
$ -
Sub-Total$ 116,622
New Personnel
New School Resource Officer – Roseville Area $ -
New Police Department Cadet position $ 45,210
New Fire Department Cadet positions$ 21,450
New Sustainability Specialist $ 33,443
Sub-Total$ 100,103
Compensation Adjustments
Employee Step Increases $ 419,256
Employee COLA 3% $ 452,923
Increase Park and Rec Seasonal Pay $ 154,872
Police Intern Pay $ 6,600
FD Advanced Life Support $ 70,141
Sub-Total$ 1,103,792
Inflationary Costs for Supplies,
Operations, and Contracts $ 310,693
Total New Tax Levy Support$ 1,631,210
345
346
Attachment E
347 Strategic Use of Reserves and Grant
348 Funding
349 Grant Funding
350 In the past couple of years, the City has been able to secure grants and other federal funding to
351 assist the community in addressing needsresulting from the COVID pandemic and its impact to
352 the economy. The City receiveda total of $3.9 million as a result of the federal American Rescue
353 Plan Act (ARPA). These funds must be committed for spending by the end of 2024. The City has
354 utilized a portion of these funds to provide programs and services to assist community members
355 impacted during the COVID pandemic and to supplement City budget needs. In addition, other
356 federal, state, and county funding has been made available to assist communities in providing
357 broader services to address the negative impacts of the current state of the economy. The 2023
358 budget utilizes these grant funds to provide needed programs and services and to lessen the
359 financial impact on the Roseville taxpayer. Detailed below are the uses of the grant funding
360 incorporated into the 2023 budget.
361
362 ARPA - Embedded Social Worker $105,000 (No tax levy impact)
nd
363 The use of ARPA funds for a 2 embedded social worker in the Police Department was
364 previously discussed and approved by the City Council and was utilized in the 2022 City Budget.
365 It is the intention that ARPA funds are used to fund this position in 2024 as well.
366
367 ARPA - Water CIP Projects $500,000 (No tax levy impact)
368 The use of ARPA funds for utility infrastructure projects was previously discussed and approved
369 by the City Council. The 2023 projects will be funded with ARPA to assist the fund balance of
370 the Water Fund.
371
372 ARPA – Housing Navigator-non grant funding $39,100 (No tax levy impact)
373 In 2022, the city received a Ramsey County CDBG grant to fund the Housing Navigator position
374 for one year (September 2022 to August 2023). The use of ARPA funds in the amount of $39,100
375 is intended to cover the costs of the position for the remainder of 2023. Staff intends to reapply
376 for the Ramsey County grant again for 2023-24, but have included the ARPA funding as the
377 revenue source if the grant is not awarded.
378
379 ARPA - 2ndSRO Roseville Areas Schools-city portion $40,000 (No tax levy impact)
380 In 2022, the city entered into an agreement with the Roseville School District to provide a second
381 School Resource Officer (SRO) for the middle and elementary schools. The 2023 budget is
382 proposing to cover the city cost of the position with ARPA funds (approximately 1/3 of the
383 position cost, the school district covers 2/3rds of the cost). This cost will need to eventually need
384 to be absorbed into thecity property tax levy.
385
386 ARPA – Police Department wellness program $30,000 (No tax levy impact)
387 In recent years, there has been more focus on law enforcement mental and physical health due to a
388 variety of factors, including a sharp increase in post-traumatic stress disorder insurance claims. As
389 a result, cities are now promoting officer wellness as a proactive measure to ensure our officers are
390 mentally and physically healthy and as a way to reduce future PTSD insurance claims. While we
Attachment E
391 have been increasing our wellness offerings over the past couple of years, the 2023 budget
392 expands the resources available. The use of ARPA funds in 2023 allows the city to bridge the
393 increase in resources to allow for this program to be absorbed into the city property tax levy.
394
395 ARPA – Metro-INET increase $100,000 (No tax levy impact)
396 Metro-INET provides computer desktop and network support to Roseville (and 35 other local
397 government agencies). In 2021/22 Metro-INET separated from Roseville and became an
398 independent joint powers authority governed by a board of member agencies. Due to a need to
399 cover new administrative governance costs, increasing licensing fees, and the need to add staff to
400 address cybersecurity and networking needs and concerns, the Metro-INET Board adopted an
401 increased budget for 2023. The increased costs were distributed to all member agencies based on
402 number of users. Roseville, being the largest user group, received an increase of $133,257 for
403 2023. The use of ARPA funds in 2023 allows the city to bridge the increase in costs to allow for
404 the costs of the services to be absorbed into the city property tax levy.
405
406 Use of Reserves
407
408 General Fund Reserves
409 At the end of 2021, the city had a General Fund Reserve level of 46%. City policy statesthe
410 General Fund Reserve level should range between 35% to 50% of the city’s annual operation
411 budget. Given the good standing of the General Fund Reserves, the 2023 budget will allocate a
412 portion of these reserves to fund one-time or infrequent expenditures planned for 2023. It should
413 be noted that the General Fund Reserve will only be used for actual costs for these projects. The
414 dollar amounts listed below are estimates. The projects include:
415
416 General Fund – Compensation Study $130,000 (No tax levy impact)
417 The city last completed and implemented a compensation study in 2013. Given the length of time
418 since the last study and the need to stay competitive in a difficult labor market, a compensation
419 study is needed to make sure we compare favorably to other public sector agencies. The dollars
420 allocated are for the study and any initialwageadjustments. Further costs can be anticipated in
421 2024when the compensation plan will be more fully implemented.
422
423 General Fund –Recodification $60,000 (No tax levy impact)
424 Recodification of the City Code into an online format was included in the 2022 city budget and
425 funded by the use of General Fund Reserves. It is currently planned to begin the work late this fall
426 and it is expected that the work will continue into 2023. Therefore, dollars are being allocated
427 from the General Fund Reserve to pay for the work that will be done in 2023.
428
429 General Fund - Strategic Plan $30,000 (No tax levy impact)
430 As an outcome of the current city-wide visioning process, it is anticipated that the city will create a
431 strategic plan to implement the results of the visioning process. General Fund Reserve dollars are
432 allocated to pay for a consultant to assist the city in creating the strategic plan.
433
434 With these projected uses of General Fund Reserves in the 2023 budget, itis estimated that the
435 fund balance will be in the 40-42% range assuming the fund does not experience any major
436 unanticipated expenditures in 2022.
437
Attachment E
438 Excess Cash Fund Reserves
439 The Excess Cash Reserve Fund currently has a balance of $700,501. This fund receives dollars
440 from other city funds that exceed the maximum fund balance outlined by city policy. In order to
441 limit the needed levy support for the overall budget, a portion of the Excess Cash Reserves is
442 proposed tobe utilized as part of the 2023 budget. These uses are as follows:
443
444 Parks and Rec Vehicle and Equipment Fund $200,000 (No tax levy impact)
445 Using a one-time infusion of $200,000 from the Excess Cash Reserve Fund will result in the Park
446 and Recreation Vehicle and Equipment Fund having a sufficient balance to pay for the identified
447 capital expenditures through 2034. Without the addition of the $200,000, the fund balance of the
448 Parks and Recreation Vehicle and Equipment Fund would be in a deficit in 2024.
449
450 Excess Cash Reserve Fund – Potential Fuel Costs $126,000 (No tax levy impact)
451 In 2022, fuel prices dramatically increased across the country. The city buys a large portion of its
452 fuel in bulk as part of the state contract at the beginning of the year and buys the remaining
453 amount on the market as needed. In anticipation of fuel prices staying at a higher level into 2023,
454 $126,000 from the Excess Cash Reserve Fund is proposed to be allocated as part of the 2023
455 budget. If fuel costs return to a lower level in 2023, dollars from the Excess Cash Reserve will not
456 be needed.
457
458
Strategic Use of Financial Reserves and Grant Funding
New Tax Levy Support
Grant Funding
$
ARPA -Embedded Social Worker ($105,000) -
$
ARPA -Water CIP Projects ($500,000) -
$
ARPA -Housing Navigator ($39,100) -
$
nd
ARPA - 2 SRO Roseville Areas Schools ($40,000)
-
$
ARPA -Police Dept. wellness program ($30,000) -
$
ARPA -Metro-INET increase ($100,000) -
$
Total -
Use of Reserves
$
General Fund – Compensation Study ($130,000) -
$
General Fund –Recodification ($60,000)-
$
General Fund - Strategic Plan ($30,000) -
Attachment E
Excess Cash Reserve Fund -Parks and Rec Vehicle $
and Equipment Fund ($200,000 ) -
Excess Cash Reserve Fund – Potential Fuel Costs $
($126,000)-
$
Total-
$
Total New Tax Levy Support -
459
E
Attachment
E
Attachment
Engaged
Documentation
&
Process
Types
software
&
Outreach
Connectivity
Present
Implementation
Assessment
&
–
Visioning
city
Bike
Units
Safety/Security,
&
Wide
Phased
Implementable
–
Centered
Housing
Modernize
Engagement
Infrastructure
Processes,
Pedestrian
–
CommunityVisioning
Community
Technology
Sustainable
&
Engagement
Modern
Infrastructure
a
Expand
Provide
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
Attachment
(Decrease)
$ 6.8% -38.6% -0.6% 1.5% 3.2% -11.6% -0.8% 60.0% -29.6% -0.7% 0.7% -3.1%$
3.3%$ 6.7% 15.2% 1.7% 9.2% -0.8% 0.0%$ 5.3%$ 274.6% 0.0% 0.0%$ -154.4%
Budget
$ 1,710,145 (538,300) (18,000) 37,720 699,730 (9,500) (3,000) 45,000 (58,000) (2,000) 230
(23,410)$ 1,840,615$ 1,632,533 246,530 326,283 906,880 (20,320) -$ 3,091,906$ 1,079,100 - -$ 1,079,100
$
Budget
$ 27,018,259 855,700 2,957,284 2,523,870 22,769,439 72,500 376,000 120,000 137,668 296,000 33,406
725,768$ 57,885,894$ 25,992,674 1,863,325 19,768,451 10,806,605 2,489,815 -$ 60,920,870$ 1,472,100 (1,092,000)
-$ 380,100 (2,654,876) 33,165,073$ 30,510,196
Actual
$ 25,308,114 1,394,000 2,975,284 2,486,150 22,069,709 82,000 379,000 75,000 195,668 298,000 33,176
749,178$ 56,045,279$ 24,360,141 1,616,795 19,442,168 9,899,725 2,510,135 -$ 57,828,964$ 393,000 (1,092,000)
-$ (699,000) (2,482,685) 35,647,758$ 33,165,073
Actual
$ 24,370,936 1,211,482 4,066,737 2,491,345 25,122,150 62,025 385,750 129,730 156,635 (277,234) 37,258
1,075,232$ 58,832,046$ 24,948,364 1,522,945 18,605,112 8,159,298 7,602,318 -$ 60,838,037$ 1,426,730 (1,799,933) -$
(373,203) (2,379,194) 38,026,952$ 35,647,758
20192020202120222023$ Increase% Incr.
Actual
$ 23,349,962 927,912 3,957,558 2,677,923 24,172,769 56,929 379,648 120,298 237,546 479,054 30,487
1,170,725$ 57,560,811$ 23,426,548 1,301,571 18,460,901 9,425,054 2,580,486 -$ 55,194,561$ 3,258,042 (2,655,448) 5,104,633$
5,707,227 8,073,477 29,953,474$ 38,026,952
Total Revenues54,093,108
Total Expenditures54,301,541
Total Other Financing Sources(66,403)
General Property Taxes21,132,512Tax Increments1,151,987Intergovernmental Revenue2,410,903Licenses & Permits3,292,244Charges for Services22,756,716Fines and Forfeits84,801Cable Franchise
Fees384,610Donations142,187Special Assessments484,673Investment Income1,047,653Gambling Taxes41,535Miscellaneous1,163,287
Personnel Services21,709,751Supplies & Materials1,452,198Other Services & Charges17,253,033Capital Outlay10,545,486Debt Service3,341,073Contingency-Transfers In / 2,711,684Transfers
Out(2,800,777)Sale of Assets/Bond Proceeds22,690
City of Roseville
Combined Funds Financial Summary(with the EDA)Revenues
ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Chg. in Fund Balance / Net Assets(274,836)Beginning Fund Balance / Net Assets30,228,310Ending Fund Balance / Net Assets29,953,474
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
Attachment
(Decrease)
$ 7.0% 0.0% -0.6% 3.3% 0.0% 8.3% -11.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% -2.4%$ 6.1%$ 8.2% 17.4% 10.2% 25.6% -1.1% 0.0%$ 11.5%$ 154.4%
0.0% 0.0%$ 154.4%
Budget
$ 1,720,820 - (18,000) 15,000 - 286,860 (9,500) - -
- - - (14,860)$ 1,980,320$ 1,504,227 202,195 572,701 1,637,680 (25,620) -$ 3,891,183$ 535,600
- -$ 535,600 $
Budget
$ 26,479,864 - 2,869,784 469,000 - 3,758,710 72,500 - -
- 135,668 207,500 597,643$ 34,590,669$ 19,956,212 1,367,075 6,185,009 8,039,805 2,213,715 -$ 37,761,816$
882,600 - -$ 882,600 (2,288,547) 27,423,165$ 25,134,618
Actual
$ 24,759,044 - 2,887,784 454,000 - 3,471,850 82,000 - -
- 135,668 207,500 612,503$ 32,610,349$ 18,451,985 1,164,880 5,612,308 6,402,125 2,239,335 -$ 33,870,633$
347,000 - -$ 347,000 (913,284) 28,336,449$ 27,423,165
Actual
$ 23,864,722 - 2,363,937 433,526 - 6,398,910 62,025 - - -
136,688 (261,089) 931,160$ 33,929,879$ 19,432,484 1,029,647 5,607,367 3,378,609 7,572,030 -$ 37,020,137$
736,511 (429,002) -$ 307,509 (2,782,749) 31,119,198$ 28,336,449
20192020202120222023$ Increase% Incr.
Actual
$ 22,887,412 - 3,394,582 403,456 - 5,375,963 56,929 - - 11,530
205,710 328,918 1,052,232$ 33,716,732$ 17,905,714 905,114 4,870,281 5,465,206 2,580,486 -$ 31,726,802$
2,897,755 (1,040,075) 5,096,604$ 6,954,284 8,944,214 22,174,983$ 31,119,198
Total Revenues30,136,279
Total Expenditures30,900,991
Total Other Financing Sources1,731,325
General Property Taxes20,680,235Tax Increments-Intergovernmental Revenue1,306,245Licenses & Permits543,865Gambling Taxes-Charges for Services5,526,375Fines and Forfeits84,801Cable Franchise
Fees-Rentals-Donations12,259Special Assessments260,733Investment Income704,149Miscellaneous1,017,617
Personnel Services16,604,125Supplies & Materials1,040,763Other Services & Charges5,272,932Capital Outlay4,642,098Debt Service3,341,073Contingency-Transfers In / Bond Prem./Proceeds2,711,684Transfers
Out(980,359)Sale of Assets-
City of Roseville
Tax-Supported Funds Financial Summary
RevenuesExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Chg. in Fund Balance966,613Beginning Fund Balance21,208,370Ending Fund Balance22,174,983
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
Attachment
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% -38.6% 0.0% 1.1% 0.7% 2.2% 0.0% -0.8% 0.0% 60.0%
0.0% -2.2% -6.3%$ -0.6%$ 2.2% 9.8% -1.8% -20.9% 100.0% 0.0%$ -3.3%$ 100.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ -52.0%
Budget
$ (10,675) (538,300) - 22,720 230 412,870 - (3,000) - 45,000 (58,000)
(2,000) (8,550)$ (139,705)$ 128,306 44,335 (246,418) (730,800) 5,300 -$ (799,277)$ 543,500 -
-$ 543,500 $
Budget
$ 538,395 855,700 87,500 2,054,870 33,406 19,010,729 - 376,000 - 120,000
2,000 88,500 128,125$ 23,295,225$ 6,036,462 496,250 13,583,442 2,766,800 276,100 -$ 23,159,054$
589,500 (1,092,000) -$ (502,500) (366,329) 5,741,908$ 5,375,579
Actual
$ 549,070 1,394,000 87,500 2,032,150 33,176 18,597,859 - 379,000 - 75,000
60,000 90,500 136,675$ 23,434,930$ 5,908,156 451,915 13,829,860 3,497,600 270,800 -$ 23,958,331$
46,000 (1,092,000) -$ (1,046,000) (1,569,401) 7,311,309$ 5,741,908
Actual
$ 506,214 1,211,482 1,702,800 2,057,819 37,258 18,723,240 - 385,750 - 129,730
19,947 (16,145) 144,072$ 24,902,167$ 5,515,880 493,298 12,997,745 4,780,689 30,288 -$
23,817,900$ 690,219 (1,370,931) -$ (680,712) 403,555 6,907,754$ 7,311,309
20192020202120222023$ Increase% Incr.
Actual
$ 462,550 927,912 562,976 2,274,467 30,487 18,796,806 - 379,648 - 108,768 31,836
150,136 118,493$ 23,844,079$ 5,520,834 396,457 13,590,620 3,959,848 - -$ 23,467,759$
360,287 (1,615,373) 8,029$ (1,247,057) (870,737) 7,778,491$ 6,907,754
Total Revenues23,956,829
Total Expenditures23,400,550
Total Other Financing Sources(1,797,728)
General Property Taxes452,277Tax Increments1,151,987Intergovernmental Revenue1,104,658Licenses & Permits2,748,379Gambling Taxes41,535Charges for Services17,230,341Fines and Forfeits-Cable
Franchise Fees384,610Rentals-Donations129,928Special Assessments223,940Investment Income343,504Miscellaneous145,670
Personnel Services5,105,626Supplies & Materials411,435Other Services & Charges11,980,101Capital Outlay5,903,388Debt Service-Contingency-Transfers In / Bond Prem./Proceeds-Transfers Out(1,820,418)Sale
of Assets22,690
City of Roseville
Non Tax-Supported Funds Financial Summary
RevenuesExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Chg. in Fund Balance / Net Assets(1,241,449)Beginning Fund Balance / Net Assets9,019,940Ending Fund Balance / Net Assets7,778,491
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
------------
Attachment
(9,500)
15,00084,650
(18,000)(14,857)
167,950342,639215,100
1,288,265
1,456,461
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 9.8% 0.0% -1.0% 3.3% 0.0% 7.1% -11.6% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -10.9%$ 8.1%$ 8.6% 21.0% 10.5%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 9.4%$ 76.3% 0.0% 0.0%$ 76.3%
Budget
$ $ $ 1,798,854$
$ 1,513,754 $ 215,100 $
Budget
$ 16,370,242 120,963$ 20,131,505$ 16,269,747 969,450 3,609,408 - - -$ 20,848,605$
497,100 - -
1,787,000 469,000 1,271,800 72,500 40,000$ 497,100 (220,000) 8,343,266$ 8,123,266
Actual
$ 14,913,781 1,805,000 454,000 1,187,150 82,000
40,000 135,820$ 18,617,751$ 14,981,482 801,500 3,266,769 -
- -$ 19,049,751$ 282,000 - -$ 282,000 (150,000) 8,493,266$ 8,343,266
Actual
$ 14,439,519 -$ 13,974,021 716,634
1,743,180 433,526 - 1,157,782 62,025 - - - 84
(14,224) 427,613$ 18,249,505 3,071,790 - - -$ 17,762,445$ 418,988 (30,250)
-$ 388,738 875,798 7,617,468$ 8,493,266
--------
36
84,80112,25964,101
543,865328,053322,665693,360
(225,000)
20192020202120222023
2,784,3151,859,353
1,198,710
Actual
11,549,987
11,862,099
$ 13,805,081 - 1,279,443 403,456 - 1,231,327 56,929 -
- 11,530 135 78,691 427,613$ 17,294,205$ 12,917,597 666,851 2,924,392 -
- -$ 16,508,840$ 2,158,801 (846,085) -$ 1,312,716 2,098,081 5,519,387$ 7,617,468
Total Revenues14,416,589
Total Expenditures15,027,662
Total Other Financing Sources1,634,353
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenuePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesTransfers In
Licenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfe
rs OutSale of Assets
City of Roseville
General Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)
Revenues Net Change in Fund Balance1,023,280Beginning Fund Balance4,496,107Ending Fund Balance5,519,387
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
----------------
Attachment
9,1701,500
43,56782,305
202,210155,802
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.9% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 6.3%$ 6.4%
4.7% 6.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 6.3%$ 100.0% 0.0%
0.0%$ 100.0%
Budget
$ 245,777$ $ $ 1,500 $
$
$ 247,277
Budget
15,000 -$ 4,149,445$ 2,579,135 205,050$ 1,500 - -$
1,500 - 1,081,044$ 1,081,044
$ 1,647,535 - - - - 2,486,910 - -
- - - 1,366,760 - - -$ 4,150,945
Actual
$ 1,603,968 - - - - 2,284,700 - -
- - - 15,000 -$ 3,903,668$ 2,423,333 195,880 1,284,455
- - -$ 3,903,668$ - - -$ -
- 1,081,044$ 1,081,044
Actual
(11,448) -$ 3,520,270$ 2,143,066 143,791$ - -
$ 1,451,761 - - - - 2,079,957 - -
- - - 999,454 - - -$ 3,286,311
-$ - 233,959 847,085$ 1,081,044
--------------
4,778
56,536
162,647
(169,985)
20192020202120222023
2,142,780
1,313,0562,218,2481,067,489
Actual
$ 1,440,289 - - - - 1,041,534 - -
- - - 8,629 135$ 2,490,587$ 1,985,478 83,844 749,166
- - -$ 2,818,489$ 235,798 - -$ 235,798 (92,103)
939,188$ 847,085
Total Revenues3,592,618
Total Expenditures3,372,916
Total Other Financing Sources(169,985)
General Property TaxesPersonnel Services
Tax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousSuppl
ies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Recreation Fund Financial Summary Expenditures Net Change in Fund Balance49,717Beginning Fund Balance889,471Ending Fund Balance939,188
RevenuesOther Financing Sources (Uses)
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-----------------
Attachment
9,500
75,73560,16025,07519,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 5.3%$
5.8% 18.2% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 6.6%$ 100.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 100.0%
Budget
$ 75,735$ $ 94,735$
$ 19,000 $
$
Budget
- -$ 1,507,695$ 1,100,420 162,575 263,700 - -
-$ 1,526,695$ 19,000 - -$ 19,000 - 499,903$ 499,903
$ 1,507,695 - - - - - -
- - - -
Actual
$ 1,431,960 - - - - - -
- - - - - -$ 1,431,960$ 1,040,260 137,500 254,200
- - -$ 1,431,960$ - - -$ -
- 499,903$ 499,903
Actual
(6,810) 1,761$ 1,422,107$ 967,954 142,883 248,570 - -
-$ 1,359,407$ - -
$ 1,427,094 - - - - - -
- - - 62 -$ - 62,700 437,203$ 499,903
---------------
198
8,9301,201
903,543142,669193,108
20192020202120222023
1,288,969
Actual
$ 1,393,520 - - - - - -
- - - 153 3,574 -$ 1,397,247$ 925,540 119,794 240,552
- - -$ 1,285,885$ - - -$ -
111,362 325,841$ 437,203
Total Revenues1,299,298
Total Expenditures1,239,320
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers Out
Tax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousSale
of Assets
City of Roseville
Park Maintenance Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance59,978Beginning Fund Balance265,863Ending Fund Balance325,841
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-----------------
(3)
Attachment
(39,323)(64,265)
133,257100,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ -26.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ -5.8%$
0.0% 0.0% 18.4% -56.5% 0.0% 0.0%$ 8.2%$ 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$ $ (39,326)$ $
$ 100,000
$ 68,992$
Budget
$ 110,677 - 77,184 - - 2,000 451,680$ 641,541$
- $ 165,000 - -$ 165,000 (100,000) 1,805,918
- - - - - - 857,141 49,400
- -$ 906,541$ 1,705,918
Actual
$ 150,000 - 77,184 - - - - -
- - - 2,000 451,683$ 680,867$ - - 723,884 113,665
- -$ 837,549$ 65,000 - -$ 65,000 (91,682) 1,897,600$ 1,805,918
Actual
$ 150,746 - 77,184 - - (5,204) 460,212$ 3,844,109$ 2,339,669
1,797$ 38,592 (398,752) -$ (360,160) (117,409) 2,015,009
3,161,171 - - - - - 1,218,212 41,680
- -$ 3,601,358$ 1,897,600
------------
3,830
52,98425,000
190,971470,286315,862
(235,374)
20192020202120222023
2,000,904
2,962,1171,154,594
Actual
$ 149,725 - - - - 3,103,102 - -
- - - 30,031 457,444$ 3,740,302$ 2,069,127 4,031 914,171
69,415 - -$ 3,056,745$ - (193,990) -$ (193,990) 489,567 1,525,442$
2,015,009
Total Revenues3,676,358
Total Expenditures3,475,190
Total Other Financing Sources(210,374)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesPersonnel ServicesSale of Assetstransfer to Metro Inet
Fines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers
InTransfers Out
City of Roseville
Information Technology Fund Financial Summary Expenditures Net Change in Fund Balance(9,206)Beginning Fund Balance1,534,648
RevenuesOther Financing Sources (Uses)Ending Fund Balance1,525,442
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
---------------------
Attachment
(25,620)(25,620)
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ -1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ -1.1%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.0%$ -1.1%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$ (25,620)$ $ (25,620)$
$ - $
$
Budget
- -$ 2,213,715$ - - - - 2,213,715
-$ 2,213,715$ - - - -$ - -
2,383,400$ 2,383,400
$ 2,213,715 - - - - - -
- - - -
Actual
$ 2,239,335 - - - - - -
- - - - - -$ 2,239,335$ - -
- - 2,239,335 -$ 2,239,335$ - - -$ - - 2,383,400$
2,383,400
Actual
(15,790) -$ 2,243,733$ - - - - 7,572,030
-$ 7,572,030$ 278,931 -
$ 2,224,959 - - - - - -
- - - 34,564 - -$ 278,931 (5,049,366) 7,432,766$ 2,383,400
------------------
38,98865,309
252,331
20192020202120222023
3,341,073
2,840,697
Actual
$ 2,205,948 - - - - - -
- - - 35,150 32,222 -$ 2,273,320$ - -
- - 2,580,486 -$ 2,580,486$ 253,156 - 5,096,604
-$ 5,349,760 5,042,594 2,390,172$ 7,432,766
Total Revenues2,944,994
Total Expenditures3,341,073
Total Other Financing Sources252,331
General Property TaxesPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceTransfers In / Bond PremiumTransfers Out
Tax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousConti
ngencyDebt Issuance / OtherSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Debt Service Funds Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance(143,748)Beginning Fund Balance2,533,920Ending Fund Balance2,390,172
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-------------------
Attachment
210,000620,840200,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 15.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%$ 14.6%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45.4% 0.0% 0.0%$ 45.4%$ 100.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 100.0%
Budget
$ 210,000$ $ 620,840$
$ 200,000 $
$
Budget
15,000 25,000$ 1,653,000$ - - - 1,988,700 -
-$ 1,988,700$ 200,000 - -$ 200,000 (135,700) 1,932,860$ 1,797,160
$ 1,613,000 - - - - - -
- - -
Actual
$ 1,403,000 - - - - - - -
- - - 15,000 25,000$ 1,443,000$ - -
- 1,367,860 - -$ 1,367,860$ - - -$
- 75,140 1,857,720$ 1,932,860
Actual
(23,670) 38,879$ 1,253,268$ - - - 884,869 -
-$ 884,869$ - - -$ - 368,399 1,489,321$ 1,857,720
$ 1,198,934 - 39,125 - - - -
- - - -
------------------
37,107
206,038
20192020202120222023
1,024,214
1,139,142
Actual
$ 1,190,812 - - - - - -
- - - - 11,332 161,467$ 1,363,611$ - -
- 2,845,288 - -$ 2,845,288$ - - -$
- (1,481,677) 2,970,998$ 1,489,321
Total Revenues1,382,287
Total Expenditures1,024,214
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets
Tax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousDebt
ServiceContingency
City of Roseville
Vehicle & Equipment Funds Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance358,073Beginning Fund Balance2,612,925Ending Fund Balance2,970,998
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
---------------------
Attachment
(6,600)
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.5% 0.0% 0.0%$ -0.5%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ -$
$ (6,600)$ $ - $
Budget
$ 776,000 - - - - - -
- - - - 3,000 -$ 779,000$ -
- - 1,268,400 - -$ 1,268,400$ - - -$
- (489,400) 2,507,825$ 2,018,425
Actual
$ 776,000 - - - - - -
- - - - 3,000 -$ 779,000$ - -
- 1,275,000 - -$ 1,275,000$ - - -$
- (496,000) 3,003,825$ 2,507,825
Actual
$ 779,860 - - - - - - -
- - - (96,817) -$ 683,043$ - -
- 172,486 - -$ 172,486$ - -
-$ - 510,557 2,493,268$ 3,003,825
------------------
77,80039,015
740,968276,961
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ 774,577 - 77,800 - - - - -
- - - 26,440 -$ 878,817$ - -
- 110,150 - -$ 110,150$ - - -$
- 768,667 1,724,601$ 2,493,268
Total Revenues857,783
Total Expenditures276,961
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers Out
MiscellaneousSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Building Replacement Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance580,822Beginning Fund Balance1,143,779Ending Fund Balance1,724,601
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
---------------------
Attachment
30,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.6% 0.0% 0.0%$ 17.6%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ -$
$ 30,000$ $ - $
Budget
$ 255,000 - - - - - -
- - - - - -$ 255,000$ -
- 200,000 - -$ 200,000$ - - -$
- 55,000 150,715$ 205,715
Actual
$ 255,000 - - - - - -
- - - - - -$ 255,000$ - -
170,000 - -$ 170,000$ - - -$ -
85,000 65,715$ 150,715
Actual
$ 246,219 - - - - - -
- - - - (686) -$ 245,533$ -
- 127,878 - -$ 127,878$ - - -$ -
117,655 (51,940)$ 65,715
----------------
364
6,798
233,940719,063350,000
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ 244,551 - - - - - -
- - - - 14 338$ 244,903$ - -
381,620 - -$ 381,620$ - - -$ - (136,717) 84,777$
(51,940)
Total Revenues241,102
Total Expenditures719,063
Total Other Financing Sources350,000
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets
Miscellaneous
City of Roseville
Pathway Maintenance Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance(127,961)Beginning Fund Balance212,738Ending Fund Balance84,777
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
---------------------
Attachment
5,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
12.5%$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ -$
$ 5,000$ $ - $
Budget
$ 21,000 - - - - - -
- - - - 500 -$ 21,500$ -
- 45,000 - - -$ 45,000$ - -
-$ - (23,500) 110,797$ 87,297
Actual
$ 21,000 - - - - - - -
- - - 500 -$ 21,500$ - - 40,000
- - -$ 40,000$ - - -$
- (18,500) 129,297$ 110,797
Actual
$ 21,104 - 18,543 - - - -
- - - - (1,284) 2,695$ 41,058$ -
- 35,576 - - -$ 35,576$ -
-
-$ - 5,482 123,815$ 129,297
-----------------
804
2,999
20,05217,95736,911
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ 20,962 - - - - - - -
- - - 1,358 5,235$ 27,555$ - -
- - - -$ -$ - - -$
- 27,555 96,260$ 123,815
Total Revenues41,812
Total Expenditures36,911
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers Out
MiscellaneousSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Street Lighting Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance4,901Beginning Fund Balance91,359Ending Fund Balance96,260
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
---------------------
Attachment
422,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.4% 0.0% 0.0%$ 41.4%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ -$
$ 422,000$ $ - $
Budget
$ 785,000 - - - - - -
- - - - 5,000 -$ 790,000$ -
- - 1,442,000 - -$ 1,442,000$ - - -$
- (652,000) 2,554,442$ 1,902,442
Actual
$ 785,000 - - - - - -
- - - - 5,000 -$ 790,000$ - -
- 1,020,000 - -$ 1,020,000$ - - -$
- (230,000) 2,784,442$ 2,554,442
Actual
$ 788,905 - - - - - -
- - - - (29,675) -$ 759,230$ -
- - 118,988 - -$ 118,988$ - -
-$ - 640,242 2,144,200$ 2,784,442
-------------------
36,82169,311
391,491
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ 783,561 - - - - - -
- - - - 21,992 -$ 805,553$ -
- - 86,490 - -$ 86,490$ - - -$
- 719,063 1,425,137$ 2,144,200
Total Revenues428,312
Total Expenditures69,311
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers Out
MiscellaneousSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Park Improvement Program Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance359,001Beginning Fund Balance1,066,136Ending Fund Balance1,425,137
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
----------------------
Attachment
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ -$
$ -$ $ - $
Budget
$ 60,000 - - - - - -
- - - - 2,000 -$ 62,000$ 6,910 30,000
43,000 - - -$ 79,910$ - - -$
- (17,910) 168,587$ 150,677
Actual
$ 60,000 - - - - - -
- - - - 2,000 -$ 62,000$ 6,910 30,000
43,000 - - -$ 79,910$ - - -$
- (17,910) 186,497$ 168,587
Actual
$ 60,298 - - - - - -
- - - - (2,076) -$ 58,222$ 7,774 24,542
33,765 - - -$ 66,081$ - -
-$ - (7,859) 194,356$ 186,497
----------------
8,1216,911
57,29138,25736,51517,380
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ 59,890 - - - - - -
- - - - 2,311 -$ 62,201$ 7,972 30,594
42,000 - - -$ 80,566$ - - -$
- (18,365) 212,721$ 194,356
Total Revenues65,412
Total Expenditures99,063
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers Out
MiscellaneousSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Boulevard Maintenance Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance(33,651)Beginning Fund Balance246,372Ending Fund Balance212,721
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
---------------------
Attachment
635,705
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.9% 0.0% 0.0%$ 25.9%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ -$
$ 635,705$ $ - $
Budget
$ 1,120,000 - 1,005,600 - - - - -
- - 135,668 125,000 -$ 2,386,268$ - -
- 3,091,305 - -$ 3,091,305$ - - -$
- (705,037) 5,884,408$ 5,179,371
Actual
$ 1,120,000 - 1,005,600 - - - - -
- - 135,668 125,000 -$ 2,386,268$ - -
- 2,455,600 - -$ 2,455,600$ - - -$
- (69,332) 5,953,740$ 5,884,408
Actual
$ 1,075,323 - 485,905 - - - - -
- - 101,978 (53,405) -$ 1,609,801$ - -
- 2,032,708 - -$ 2,032,708$ - -
-$ - (422,907) 6,376,647$ 5,953,740
--------------
29,73511,481
601,559221,511325,428225,000
(350,000)
20192020202120222023
2,219,307
Actual
$ 818,496 - 2,037,339 - - - -
- - - 170,272 112,324 -$ 3,138,431$ - -
- 1,972,243 - -$ 1,972,243$ 250,000 - -$ 250,000 1,416,188 4,960,459$
6,376,647
Total Revenues1,189,714
Total Expenditures2,219,307
Total Other Financing Sources(125,000)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayTransfers InTransfers Out
Miscellaneous / Developer FeeDebt ServiceContingencySale of Assets
City of Roseville
Street Infrastructure Replacement Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance(1,154,593)Beginning Fund Balance6,115,052Ending Fund Balance4,960,459
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
----------------
Attachment
700
(425)
(3,561)
22,72010,00020,825
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 22.2% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 1.7%$ -0.2%
-3.2% 6.2% 43.8% 0.0% 0.0%$ 1.0%$ 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$ $ 32,720$
$ 17,539$ $ - $
Budget
$ - - - 25,000 -$ 1,998,420$ 1,436,509 12,700 358,970
2,300 - -$ 1,810,479$ - - -$ -
187,941 4,620,217$ 4,808,158
1,918,420 - 55,000 - - - - -
Actual
$ - - - 1,895,700 - 45,000 - -
- - - 25,000 -$ 1,965,700$ 1,440,070 13,125 338,145
1,600 - -$ 1,792,940$ - - -$ -
172,760 4,447,457$ 4,620,217
Actual
$ - - - (5,912) 2,790$ 1,993,471$ 1,350,585 8,705 295,145
- - -$ 1,654,435$ - -
1,946,888 - 49,705 - - - - -
-$ - 339,036 4,108,421$ 4,447,457
-------------
4,2948,6555,260
71,32193,721
(35,000)
275,201
20192020202120222023
1,068,833
2,586,833
Actual
$ - - - 2,177,037 - 64,201 - -
- - 120 65,930 380$ 2,307,668$ 1,371,696 8,362 294,299
27,873 - -$ 1,702,230$ - - -$ - 605,438 3,502,983$
4,108,421
Total Revenues2,756,169
Total Expenditures1,357,949
Total Other Financing Sources(35,000)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsPersonnel ServicesTransfers InTransfers Out
Gambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital
OutlayDebt ServiceContingencySale of Assets
City of Roseville
Community Development Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance1,363,220Beginning Fund Balance2,139,763Ending Fund Balance3,502,983
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-------------------
Attachment
4,010
(31,065)(35,075)
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ -7.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ -5.6%$
2.1% 0.0% -9.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ -5.6%$ 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ (31,065)$
$ (31,065)$ $ - $
Budget
$ 411,505 - - - - 85,000 - -
- - - - 23,125$ 519,630$ 198,080 -
321,550 - - -$ 519,630$ - - -$
- - 944,234$ 944,234
Actual
$ 442,570 - - - - 85,000 - -
- - - - 23,125$ 550,695$ 194,070 - 356,625
- - -$ 550,695$ - - -$ -
- 944,234$ 944,234
Actual
$ 455,965 - - - - 85,000 - -
- - - 8,579 25,295$ 574,839$ 195,074 459 191,001
- - -$ 386,534$ - -
-$ - 188,305 755,929$ 944,234
--------------
7
4,916
47,93785,00027,375
452,277204,760200,918
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ 462,550 - 179,514 - - 85,000 - -
- - - 3,773 25,295$ 756,132$ 204,760 33 237,158
- - -$ 441,951$ - - -$
- 314,181 441,748$ 755,929
Total Revenues617,505
Total Expenditures405,685
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers Out
MiscellaneousSale of Assets
City of Roseville
EDA General Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance211,820Beginning Fund Balance229,928Ending Fund Balance441,748
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-----------------
Attachment
500
(3,000)
20,39046,84011,052
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 19.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
-0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 3.3%$
16.0% 0.0% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 11.3%$ 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ 17,390$ $
58,392$ $ - $
Budget
$ 126,890 - - - - 46,000 - 376,000
- - - 500 -$ 549,390$ 340,020 1,000 234,370
- - -$ 575,390$ - - -$
- (26,000) 109,609$ 83,609
Actual
$ 106,500 - - - - 46,000 - 379,000
- - - 500 -$ 532,000$ 293,180 500 223,318
- - -$ 516,998$ - - -$
- 15,002 94,607$ 109,609
Actual
$ 50,249 - - - - 23,083 - 385,750
- - - 196$ 459,278$ 274,968 2,595 212,180
- - -$ 489,743$ - - -$ -
(30,465) 125,072$ 94,607
---------------
9,0574,3422,561
384,610247,321190,920
(141,947)
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ - - - - - 27,940 -
379,648 - - - 449 -$ 408,037$ 243,531 316 199,434
- - -$ 443,281$ - - -$ - (35,244)
160,316$ 125,072
Total Revenues398,009
Total Expenditures440,802
Total Other Financing Sources(141,947)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets
Miscellaneous
City of Roseville
Communications Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance(184,740)Beginning Fund Balance345,056Ending Fund Balance160,316
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
------------------
Attachment
(1,000)(8,230)
38,30051,430
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -50.0% 0.0%$ 1.8%$ 3.2%
0.0% -4.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 2.3%$ 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$ $ 37,300$
$ 43,200$ $ - $
Budget
$ - - - - - 1,000 -$ 2,101,000$
1,683,210 29,000 180,620 - - -$ 1,892,830$ - (302,000)
-$ (302,000) (93,830) 277,744$ 183,914
2,100,000 - - - - -
Actual
$ - - - - - 2,061,700 -
- - - - 2,000 -$ 2,063,700$ 1,631,780 29,000 188,850
- - -$ 1,849,630$ - (302,000) -$ (302,000) (87,930)
365,674$ 277,744
Actual
$ - - - - - 3,518 -$ 1,551,930$
1,572,764 25,717 167,799 - - -$ 1,766,280$ 688,000 (302,000)
1,548,412 - - - - - -$ 386,000
171,650 194,024$ 365,674
--------------
20,47033,67154,909
280,097114,758
(601,140)
20192020202120222023
1,395,504
1,977,123
Actual
$ - - - - - 1,372,500 - -
- - - 370 -$ 1,372,870$ 1,496,091 19,571 149,672
94,042 - -$ 1,759,376$ 354,958 (302,000) -$ 52,958 (333,548)
527,572$ 194,024
Total Revenues2,277,690
Total Expenditures1,598,842
Total Other Financing Sources(601,140)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesPersonnel ServicesTransfers InTransfers Out
Fines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencySale
of Assets
City of Roseville
License Center Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance77,708Beginning Fund Balance449,864Ending Fund Balance527,572
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
--------------------
Attachment
5,370
31,600
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$
0.0%$ 2.1% 0.0% 76.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 12.6%$
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ -$
$ 36,970$ $ - $
Budget
$ - - - 136,450 - 30,000 - -
- - - 10,000 -$ 176,450$ 255,150 2,700 73,000
- - -$ 330,850$ - - -$
- (154,400) 420,677$ 266,277
Actual
$ - - - 136,450 - 30,000 - -
- - - 10,000 -$ 176,450$ 249,780 2,700 41,400
- - -$ 293,880$ - - -$
- (117,430) 538,107$ 420,677
Actual
$ - - - 110,931 - 100,279 -
- - - - (13,862) -$ 197,348$ 230,903 1,791
43,673 - - -$ 276,367$ - -
-$ - (79,019) 617,126$ 538,107
---------------
2,1387,825
16,70740,57727,553
161,546225,651
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ - - - 97,430 - 37,991 - -
- - - 16,588 -$ 152,009$ 244,608 167 51,041
- - -$ 295,816$ - - -$ -
(143,807) 760,933$ 617,126
Total Revenues218,830
Total Expenditures263,167
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers Out
MiscellaneousSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Engineering Services Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance(44,337)Beginning Fund Balance805,270Ending Fund Balance760,933
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
------------------
Attachment
230230
45,00045,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 41.8%$
0.7% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 41.8%$ 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ 45,230$ $
45,230$ $ - $
Budget
$ - - - - 33,406 - -
- - 120,000 - - -$ 153,406$ 33,406 -
120,000 - -$ 153,406$ - - -$
- - 2,478$ 2,478
Actual
$ - - - - 33,176 - -
- - 75,000 - - -$ 108,176$ 33,176 -
75,000 - - -$ 108,176$ - - -$
- - 2,478$ 2,478
Actual
$ - - - - 37,258 - -
- - 129,730 - 172 -$ 167,160$ 36,045 -
141,000 - - -$ 177,045$ - - -$
- (9,885) 12,363$ 2,478
-----------------
3,189
41,53535,48592,000
129,928
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ - - - - 30,487 - -
- - 108,768 - 1,092 -$ 140,347$ 31,327 -
225,575 - - -$ 256,902$ - - -$
- (116,555) 128,918$ 12,363
Total Revenues174,652
Total Expenditures127,485
Total Other Financing Sources-
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets
Miscellaneous
City of Roseville
Lawful Gambling Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance47,167Beginning Fund Balance81,751Ending Fund Balance128,918
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
---------------
Attachment
700
5,300
(8,000)
18,87029,500
500,000
(325,000)
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%$ -0.1%$
2.6% 14.5% 0.0% -39.2% 100.0% 0.0%$ -3.5%$ 100.0% 0.0%
0.0%$ -129.9%
Budget
$ $ (8,000)$ $
$ 500,000 $
$ (270,630)
Budget
$ - - - - - - 22,000$ 7,330,000$
735,580 233,500 5,795,005$ 500,000 (385,000) -$ 115,000 (100,185) (2,707,112)$ (2,807,297)
7,308,000 - - - - - 505,000 276,100
-$ 7,545,185
Actual
$ - - - - - 7,308,000 -
- - - - - 30,000$ 7,338,000$ 716,710 204,000 5,794,305
830,000 270,800 -$ 7,815,815$ - (385,000) -$ (385,000)
(862,815) (1,844,297)$ (2,707,112)
Actual
$ - - - - - (159) 6,255$ 7,245,964$
575,180 269,695 6,144,073 (385,000)
7,239,868 - - - - - 1,273,858 30,288
-$ 8,293,094$ - - -$ (385,000) (1,432,130) 794,533$ (1,844,297)
---------------
7,514
14,889
618,398221,459
(385,000)
20192020202120222023
5,089,416
6,799,1681,566,928
Actual
$ - - - - - 6,961,956 -
- - - - - 38,128$ 7,000,084$ 618,539 215,868 5,355,082
683,309 - -$ 6,872,798$ - (385,000) (35,637) 404$ (420,233)
(292,947) (2,040,542)$ 794,533
Total Revenues6,806,682
Total Expenditures7,496,201
Total Other Financing Sources(370,111)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & Charges
Fines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutBond Issunace CostsSale
of Assets
City of Roseville
Water Fund Financial Summary Expenditures Net Change in Assets(1,059,630)Beginning Net Assets-Unrestricted(189,930)Ending Net Assets-Unrestricted(2,040,542)
RevenuesOther Financing Sources (Uses)
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-----------------
Attachment
4,000
(91,000)
230,000246,869
(615,000)
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 4.0%$
-17.9% 8.9% 6.8% -43.5% 0.0% 0.0%$ -8.1%$ 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$ $ 230,000$
$ $ - $
$
(455,131)
Budget
$ - - - - - - -$ 6,000,000$
417,230 48,700 3,873,169$ - (285,000) -$ (285,000) 575,901 1,346,173$ 1,922,074
6,000,000 - - - - - 800,000 -
-$ 5,139,099
Actual
$ - - - - - 5,770,000 - -
- - - - -$ 5,770,000$ 508,230 44,700 3,626,300 1,415,000
- -$ 5,594,230$ - (285,000) -$ (285,000) (109,230) 1,455,403$
1,346,173
Actual
$ - - 274,096 - - (5,048) -$ 6,329,871$
512,436 36,882 3,702,118$ - (285,000)
6,042,776 - - - - 18,047 2,392,046 -
-$ 6,643,482 -$ (285,000) (598,611) 865,153$ 1,455,403
------------
8,609
37,32816,500
438,602212,117537,215
(285,000)
20192020202120222023
3,858,782
5,521,7631,461,187
Actual
$ - - 118,377 - - 5,689,808 - -
- - 29,024 6,591 -$ 5,843,800$ 545,260 28,133 3,857,363
1,763,715 - -$ 6,194,471$ - (285,000) 404$ (284,596) (635,267)
1,046,300$ 865,153
Total Revenues6,181,091
Total Expenditures5,894,512
Total Other Financing Sources(268,500)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & Charges
Fines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment IncomeMiscellaneousCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers In / Capital ContributionsTransfers
OutSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Sewer Fund Financial Summary Expenditures Net Change in Assets18,079Beginning Net Assets-Unrestricted712,428Ending Net Assets-Unrestricted1,046,300
RevenuesOther Financing Sources (Uses)
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-----------------
Attachment
9,160
(3,000)
83,69038,960
165,000
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 3.8%$ 8.3%
9.8% 0.0% 13.7% 0.0% 0.0%$ 8.5%$ 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ 80,690$ $ 213,120$
$ - $
Budget
$ - - - - - 2,175,929 -
- - - 2,000 2,000 -$ 2,179,929$ 510,200 102,500 751,000
1,370,000 - -$ 2,733,700$ - (100,000) -$ (100,000) (653,771)
841,158$ 187,387
Actual
$ - - - - - 2,092,239 - -
- - 5,000 2,000 -$ 2,099,239$ 471,240 93,340 751,000 1,205,000
- -$ 2,520,580$ - (100,000) -$ (100,000) (521,341) 1,362,499$
841,158
Actual
$ - - 1,241,191 - - 2,503,754 - -
- - 1,900 553 1,551$ 3,748,949$ 433,789 78,438 793,564
1,114,785 - -$ 2,420,576$ - (100,000) -$ (100,000) 1,228,373 2,504,760$
1,362,499
-----------
8,4926,1002,840
11,82310,93067,431
415,539667,829805,269
(100,000)
20192020202120222023
1,981,263
Actual
$ - - 128,125 - - 3,652,479 - -
- - 2,692 7,306 7,565$ 3,798,167$ 432,616 96,112 761,934
1,233,291 - -$ 2,523,953$ - (100,000) 6,871$ (93,129) 1,181,085
733,539$ 2,504,760
Total Revenues2,018,608
Total Expenditures1,956,068
Total Other Financing Sources(97,160)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomeMiscellaneousPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers In / Capital ContributionsTransfers OutSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Stormwater Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Assets(34,620)Beginning Net Assets-Unrestricted258,649Ending Net Assets-Unrestricted733,539
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-------------------
Attachment
31,93040,17723,678
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 3.5%$
91.2% 100.0% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 7.1%$ 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ 31,930$
$ 63,855$ $ - (31,925)$
Budget
$ - - 87,500 - - 868,000 - -
- - - - -$ 955,500$ 84,237 2,250
880,938 - - -$ 967,425$ - (20,000) -$ (20,000)
(31,925) 370,681$ 338,756
Actual
$ - - 87,500 - - 836,070 - -
- - - - -$ 923,570$ 44,060 2,250
857,260 - - -$ 903,570$ - (20,000) -$ (20,000)
- 370,681$ 370,681
Actual
$ - - 87,513 - - 765,139 - -
- - - (2,729) -$ 849,923$ 33,603 - 532,825
- - -$ 566,428$ - (20,000) -$ (20,000)
263,495 107,186$ 370,681
--------------
122733
1,298
43,751
(20,000)
101,406476,507559,568
20192020202120222023
Actual
$ - - 136,960 - - 583,147 - -
- - - 449 875$ 721,431$ 34,133 2,250 582,098
- - -$ 618,481$ - (20,000) -$ (20,000)
82,950 24,236$ 107,186
Total Revenues579,333
Total Expenditures604,052
Total Other Financing Sources(20,000)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomeMiscellaneousPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Recycling Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Assets(44,719)Beginning Net Assets-Unrestricted68,955Ending Net Assets-Unrestricted24,236
Revenues
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
-------------
--
Attachment
(550)
1,600
18,95016,98011,46343,50043,500
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.7%$ 4.5%$
5.2% 2.6% 14.8% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ 14.4%$ 100.0% 0.0%
0.0%$ 100.0%$
Budget
$
$ 18,400$
$ 73,543$ $ 43,500 (11,643) $
Budget
$ - - - - - 342,800 -
- - - - - 83,000$ 425,800$ 342,840 63,900
89,120 89,500 - -$ 585,360$ 89,500 -
-$ 89,500 (70,060) (178,863)$ (248,923)
Actual
$ - - - - - 323,850 -
- - - - - 83,550$ 407,400$ 325,860 62,300 77,657
46,000 - -$ 511,817$ 46,000 - -$
46,000 (58,417) (120,446)$ (178,863)
Actual
$ - - - - - 365,224 -
- - - - (621) 108,181$ 472,784$ 300,533 69,016 150,587
- - -$ 520,136$ - -
-$ - (47,352) (162,111)$ (120,446)
--------------
8,235
94,74737,45297,419
(11,539)
301,489313,169
20192020202120222023
2,002,010
Actual
$ - - - - - 321,784 -
- - - - 1,055 46,250$ 369,089$ 298,273 25,645 162,357
157,618 - -$ 643,893$ - - 350$ 350 (116,836)
(134,472)$ (162,111)
Total Revenues404,471
Total Expenditures2,450,050
Total Other Financing Sources(11,539)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomeMiscellaneousPersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets
City of Roseville
Golf Course Fund Financial Summary ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)
Revenues Net Change in Assets(75,107)Beginning Net Assets-Unrestricted(90,880)Ending Net Assets-Unrestricted(134,472)
F
(Decr.)
9/26/2022
------------------
Attachment
(1,000)
(55,000)
(538,300)(594,300)
$ Increase% Incr.
(Decrease)
$ 0.0% -38.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100.0% -2.0% 0.0%$ -39.6%$ 0.0%
0.0% -39.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%$ -39.6%$ 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%$ 0.0%
Budget
$
$ (594,300)$
$ (594,300)$ $ -
$
Budget
$ - 855,700 - - - - - -
- - - 50,000 -$ 905,700$ - - 905,700
- - -$ 905,700$ - - -$ -
- 3,774,096$ 3,774,096
Actual
$ - 1,394,000 - - - - - -
- - 55,000 51,000 -$ 1,500,000$ - -
1,500,000 - - -$ 1,500,000$ - - -$ - -
3,774,096$ 3,774,096
Actual
$ - 1,211,482 100,000 - - - -
- - - - (848) -$ 1,310,634$ -
- 623,780 - - -$ 623,780$ 2,219 (278,931) -$
(276,712) 410,142 3,363,954$ 3,774,096
y
-----------------
228,124140,829792,802
(252,331)
20192020202120222023
1,151,987
Actual
$ - 927,912 - - - - - -
- - - 45,477 -$ 973,389$ - - 1,702,478
- - -$ 1,702,478$ 5,329 (523,373) -$ (518,044)
(1,247,133) 4,611,087$ 3,363,954
Total Revenues1,520,940
Total Expenditures792,802
Total Other Financing Sources(252,331)
General Property TaxesTax IncrementsIntergovernmental RevenueLicenses & PermitsGambling TaxesCharges for ServicesFines and ForfeitsCable Franchise FeesRentalsDonationsSpecial AssessmentsInvestment
IncomeMiscellaneous / Developer FeePersonnel ServicesSupplies & MaterialsOther Services & ChargesCapital OutlayDebt ServiceContingencyTransfers InTransfers OutSale of Assets / Bonds
City of Roseville
Tax Increment Financing Funds Financial Summar ExpendituresOther Financing Sources (Uses)Net Change in Fund Balance475,807Beginning Fund Balance4,135,280Ending Fund Balance4,611,087
Revenues
Attachment F
2023BUDGETREVENUECHANGESONLY 9/26/2022
TotalTaxSupportedFeeSupported
PropertyTaxes
GeneralFund$1,456,461$1,456,461
Communications
$20,390$20,390
Recreation43,567$$43,567
ParksMaintenance$75,735$75,735
InformationTechnologyCapital$(100,000)$(100,000)
InformationTechnologyOperations$60,677$60,677
GODebt$(25,620)$(25,620)
Vehicle&EquipmentReplacement$210,000$210,000
EDA$(31,065)$(31,065)
TotalChangeinPropertyTaxes$1,710,145$1,720,820$(10,675)
TaxIncrements
TIFPayasyougonotes$(538,300)$(538,300)
IntergovernmentalRevenue
Generalstateaids(police,fire)$8,000$8,000
GeneralMSAMaint$(26,000)$(26,000)
Totalchangeinintergovernmental$(18,000)$(18,000)$
Licenses&Permits
GeneralPawnShopfees$(5,000)$(5,000)
GenFundFireMFRentalInspection$20,000$20,000
CmtyDevvariouspermitsandlicenses$22,720$22,720
Totalchangeinlicenses&Permits$37,720$15,000$22,720
ChargesforServices
GenFundFireInspections$4,650$4,650
GenFundSchoolLiaison$80,000$80,000
Recreationfeeactivities$128,360$128,360
RecreationNonfeeactivities$2,350$2,350
RecreationSkatingCenter$71,000$71,000
RecreationNatureCenter$500$500
CDTechnologyFee$5,000$5,000
CDSACAdminFee$5,000$5,000
LicenseCenterMV,DL,Passports$38,300$38,300
SanitarySewer4%increase$230,000$230,000
StormDrainage4%incperUtilityRateStudy$83,690$83,690
Recyclingincreasetocoverexpenses$31,930$31,930
GolfGreenfees&Equipsales$18,950$18,950
TotalChangeinChargesforServices$699,730$286,860$412,870
FinesandForfeits
GeneralFundRamseyCocourtfines$(9,500)$(9,500)
Totalchangeincourtfines$(9,500)$(9,500)$
CableFranchiseFees
Communicationsbasedon5yraverage$(3,000)$(3,000)
SpecialAssessments
StormDrainage$(3,000)$(3,000)
TIF$(55,000)$(55,000)
Totalchangeinspecialassessments$(58,000)$$(58,000)
Attachment F
2023BUDGETREVENUECHANGESONLY 9/26/2022
TotalTaxSupportedFeeSupported
InterestEarnings
LicenseCenter$(1,000)$(1,000)
TIF$(1,000)$(1,000)
TotalChangeinInterestearnings$(2,000)$$(2,000)
Donations&Miscellaneous
GenFundMetroInetreimbrent&finsvcs$(16,051)$(16,051)
GenfundStreetpatch$1,000$1,000
GenfundUNWPILOT$191$191
Lawfulgamblingbasedonpastyear$45,230$45,230
Waterbasedonaverages$(8,000)$(8,000)
Golfequiprental&miscellaneous$(550)$(550)
TotalChangeinMisc/TransfersIn$21,820$(14,860)$36,680
TransfersIn
ARPAFunds$709,100$209,100$500,000
ExcessCashReserveFund$326,500$326,500
Golftrfintocovercapitalexpenses$43,500$43,500
$1,079,100$535,600$543,500
TotalRevenue&TransferInChanges$2,919,715$2,515,920$403,795
(USE)OFRESERVES20232022 Change
orAddtoReserves2023vs2022
GenFundCASHRESERVES$(220,000)$(150,000)$(70,000)
ITFund(100,000)(91,682)(8,318)
Vehicle&EquipmentFunds(135,700)75,140(210,840)
Facilities(489,400)(496,000)6,600
Pathways55,00085,000(30,000)
StreetLightReplacement(23,500)(18,500)(5,000)
ParkImprovement(652,000)(230,000)(422,000)
BlvdLandscaping(17,910)(17,910)0
StreetInfrastructure(PMP)(705,037)(69,332)(635,705)
CmtyDev187,941172,76015,181
Communications(26,000)15,002(41,002)
LicenseCenter(93,830)(87,930)(5,900)
EngineeringServices(154,400)(117,430)(36,970)
Wateradjustoutdepreciation289,815(202,015)491,830
Seweradjustoutdepreciation119,901346,770(226,869)
Stormadjustoutdepreciation(173,771)(41,341)(132,430)
Recycling(31,925)0(31,925)
Golf(70,060)(58,417)(11,643)
$(2,240,876)$(885,885)$(1,354,991)
Attachment F
2023BUDGETEXPENDITURECHANGESONLY 9/26/2022
Fee
TotalTaxSupportedSupported
PERSONNELCHANGES
Steps,turnover,insurance&unionchanges$360,776$419,256$(58,480)
Paramedicpay$70,141$70,141
COLA$598,223$452,923$145,300
Increasetemp/seasonal/interns$176,222$161,472$14,750
Overtimeincreasespolice&fire$45,000$45,000
FireCadets$21,450$21,450
ReclassifiedorincreasedtoFulltime(7positions)104,854$$96,232$8,622
HsgNavigator7/202312/2023$39,100$39,100
NewSLOpartlyfundedbySchoolseerevenues$120,000$120,000
Policenewfulltimecadet$71,580$71,580
PolicereduceptCSOfrom3to2$(26,370)$(26,370)
SustainabilitySpecialist$111,477$33,443$78,034
CommDigitalSocialMediaSpecialist$42,130$42,130
CmtyDevnetelimopenpostion$(102,050)$(102,050)
$1,632,533$1,504,227$128,306
SUPPLIES&MATERIALS
MotorFuelacrossdepartments$144,850$126,100$18,750
Policeuniforms$10,000$10,000
Policevehiclesupplies$27,000$27,000
Fireoperatingsupplies$4,500$4,500
PWStreetsoperatingsupplies$14,650$14,650
RecPrgsoperatingsupplies$5,570$5,570
Wateroperatingsupplies$20,000$20,000
Otherminorcostchanges$19,960$14,375$5,585
$246,530$202,195$44,335
OTHERSERVICES&CHARGES
CouncilCmtyVisioning/Strategicplanning$(70,000)$(70,000)
CouncilNYFSincrease$6,280$6,280
Admin&PlanningRecodification$10,000$10,000
AdminCompensationStudy&implementation$130,000$130,000
AdminSHREAP&DEIinitiatives$9,500$9,500
TuitionReimbursementincreaseadmin&police$9,000$9,000
PoliceBodyWornCameraSupport$60,000$60,000
PoliceWellness$30,000$30,000
Policesoftware/maint$24,000$24,000
Policedispatchservices$50,950$50,950
Utilitiesfire,BldgMaint,StreetLightes,SkatingCtr47,000$$47,000
PRMaintdiseasetreeremovelnonEAB$9,000$9,000
PRfee&skatecreditcardfees$14,500$14,500
ITChargefromMetroINET$133,257$133,257
CDCodeEnfElectricalInspector&CCfees$20,000$20,000
EDAprofsvcs&misc$13,500$13,500
EDAsmallbus.Loanprogram$(48,575)$(48,575)
Attachment F
2023BUDGETEXPENDITURECHANGESONLY 9/26/2022
Fee
TotalTaxSupportedSupported
Communicationsvariouscostincreases$11,052$11,052
LicCntrreducedcourier$(21,500)$(21,500)
LicCntrincreasedpostage$10,000$10,000
LicCntrincreasedminorequipcomputers$14,020$14,020
EngSvcsmiscstudies(bikeplanconsultant)$31,600$31,600
Lawfulgamblingfunctionofrevenues$45,000$45,000
WaterSt.PaulWater$250,000$250,000
WaterMiscellaneous$(270,800)$(270,800)
Waterutilities,contractmaint$18,000$18,000
Sewerutilities,contractmaint,profservices$24,500$24,500
SewerMetroWaste$196,569$196,569
Sewercreditcardfees$23,000$23,000
StormwaterMS4permit&BMPAssetMgmt$14,200$14,200
RecylcingContract$21,528$21,528
GolfCedarholmbldgrepairs&CCfees$8,500$8,500
TIF$(594,300)$(594,300)
Otherminorcostchanges$91,502$104,214$(12,712)
$321,283$567,701$(246,418)
DEBTSERVICECHANGES
DebtServiceWater$5,300$5,300
DebtServiceGO$(25,620)$(25,620)
$(20,320)$(25,620)$5,300
CAPITALOUTLAYCHANGES
Vehicles&Equipment$620,840$620,840
Facilities$(6,600)$(6,600)
Pathways&ParkingLots$30,000$30,000
StreetLighting$5,000$5,000
ParkImprovements$422,000$422,000
PavementManagement$635,705$635,705
ITEquipment$(64,265)$(64,265)
Golfequipment$43,500$43,500
Stormwatercapital$165,000$165,000
Sewercapital$(615,000)$(615,000)
Watercapital$(325,000)$(325,000)
CmtyDevequipment$700$700
TotalChangeinCapitalOutlay$911,880$1,642,680$(730,800)
TotalExpenditureChanges$3,091,906$3,891,183$(799,277)
From:noreply@civicplus.com
To:*RVCouncil; Pat Trudgeon; Corey A. Yunke; Rebecca Toews
Subject:Online Form Submittal: 2023 Roseville Resident Budget Priorities
Date:Sunday, September 18, 2022 2:29:57 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use
caution.
2023 Roseville Resident Budget Priorities
The City of Roseville believes that those who are affected by a decision have a
right to be involved in the decision-making process. in this spirit, City staff and City
Council encourage residents to provide feedback and to ask questions throughout
the budget process and in advance of the adoption of the 2023 budget.
Contact Information
Richard
First Name
Cloutier
Last Name
637 TRANSIT AVE W
Address 1
Field not completed.
Address 2
Roseville
City
MN
State
55113
Zip Code
Home or Cell Phone
Number
Email Address
Field not completed.
1. In what ways does
the preliminary budget
align with your priorities
for Roseville?
Full time Environmental Sustainability Specialist.
2. In what ways does
Renaming parks.
the preliminary budget
Dance Studio in the Master Plan.
not align with your
priorities for Roseville?
Field not completed.
What changes would
you suggest for the
2023 City Budget?
NOTE: If you submit this form, please DO NOT mail the Roseville Resident
Budget Priorities Form included in the September/October City News. Thank you!
Unless restricted by law, all correspondence to and from Roseville City
government offices, including information submitted through electronic forms such
as this one, may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act
and/or may be disclosed to third parties.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may be
disclosed to third parties.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
2
From:noreply@civicplus.com
To:*RVCouncil; Pat Trudgeon; Corey A. Yunke; Rebecca Toews
Subject:Online Form Submittal: 2023 Roseville Resident Budget Priorities
Date:Saturday, September 3, 2022 5:43:41 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use
caution.
2023 Roseville Resident Budget Priorities
The City of Roseville believes that those who are affected by a decision have a
right to be involved in the decision-making process. in this spirit, City staff and City
Council encourage residents to provide feedback and to ask questions throughout
the budget process and in advance of the adoption of the 2023 budget.
Contact Information
Emmit
First Name
G
Last Name
2194 Irene
Address 1
Field not completed.
Address 2
Field not completed.
City
Field not completed.
State
Field not completed.
Zip Code
Field not completed.
Home or Cell Phone
Number
Email Address
I love the strong investment into parks and recreation. Roseville
1. In what ways does
has the parks parks out of any city I’ve ever lived in and it makes
the preliminary budget
sense why.
align with your priorities
for Roseville?
Police being given 18% of the budget and being the second
2. In what ways does
highly funded section feels a little disrespectful considering
the preliminary budget
Roseville is below average in crime not only in Minnesota, but
not align with your
nationwide.
priorities for Roseville?
I don’t see a scenario where the Police funding was cut by 33%
What changes would
that Roseville would become some crime haven. It would also
you suggest for the
allow Roseville to fund a non armed community peace force that
2023 City Budget?
can deal with non violent crimes. Roseville could also further
fund parks, schools, and other ESSENTIAL services other than
police. There have been many major US cities to significantly cut
the police budget and I think a city like Roseville with its older
population and low crime can afford to be a leader for the rest of
the twin cities.
NOTE: If you submit this form, please DO NOT mail the Roseville Resident
Budget Priorities Form included in the September/October City News. Thank you!
Unless restricted by law, all correspondence to and from Roseville City
government offices, including information submitted through electronic forms such
as this one, may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act
and/or may be disclosed to third parties.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
From:noreply@civicplus.com
To:*RVCouncil; Pat Trudgeon; Corey A. Yunke; Rebecca Toews
Subject:Online Form Submittal: 2023 Roseville Resident Budget Priorities
Date:Friday, August 26, 2022 10:05:01 AM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use
caution.
2023 Roseville Resident Budget Priorities
The City of Roseville believes that those who are affected by a decision have a
right to be involved in the decision-making process. in this spirit, City staff and City
Council encourage residents to provide feedback and to ask questions throughout
the budget process and in advance of the adoption of the 2023 budget.
Contact Information
Carol
First Name
Marchel
Last Name
2976 Highcourte
Address 1
Field not completed.
Address 2
Roseville
City
MN
State
55113
Zip Code
Home or Cell Phone
Number
Email Address
Park and Rec have a sizeable presence in the budget
1. In what ways does
the preliminary budget
align with your priorities
for Roseville?
More $$ needed to go to climate/sustainability efforts.
2. In what ways does
the preliminary budget
not align with your
priorities for Roseville?
City should budget for a staff position for sustainability manager
What changes would
you suggest for the
2023 City Budget?
NOTE: If you submit this form, please DO NOT mail the Roseville Resident
Budget Priorities Form included in the September/October City News. Thank you!
Unless restricted by law, all correspondence to and from Roseville City
government offices, including information submitted through electronic forms such
as this one, may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act
and/or may be disclosed to third parties.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
How would you prefer to
Email
be contacted? Remember
to fill in the
corresponding contact
information.
Email Address:
Phone Number:
Please Share Your
I have been paying attention to the budget for nearly two
Comment, Question or
decades. I just reviewed a few old email threads between Chris
Concern
Miller and myself on property taxes, CIP, sustainability and
metrics used (or not) to track Departmental budget and
spending.
I remember when the City was not on a sustainable path in
terms of spending. It is not place to which to aspire.
I disagree with the Finance Commission recommendation to
reduce the levy to 5 or 6 percent from the recommended (and
already decreased from the most desired plan). I strongly
object to tapping reserves.
We are living in an uncertain time, including financially. Now is
not the time to take a risk on drawing down our reserves .... we
may indeed need them.
And, I am very concerned about our ability to attract talent and
retain them. We all know that this will require very competitive
salaries and benefits, which may involve even more money
than currently foreseen.
Unless restricted by law, all correspondence to and from Roseville City government
offices, including information submitted through electronic forms such as this one,
may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may be
disclosed to third parties.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
2
From:noreply@civicplus.com
To:*RVCouncil; Rebecca Olson; Pat Trudgeon
Subject:Online Form Submittal: Contact City Council
Date:Tuesday, August 23, 2022 11:42:32 AM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use
caution.
Contact City Council
Please complete this online form and submit.
2023 Budget
Subject
Contact Information
Cynthia White
Name:
2489 Churchill St.
Address:
Roseville
City:
Minnesota
State:
55113
Zip:
This form goes to the Mayor, all Councilmembers and certain City Staff. Due to
the volume of emails submitted, a personal reply is not always possible.
Email
How would you prefer
to be contacted?
Remember to fill in the
corresponding contact
information.
Email Address:
Phone Number:
I appreciated the presentation last night on the 2023 budget.
Please Share Your
Comment, Question or
I appreciate the sensitivity to citizen's budgets and the increase
Concern
in property tax.
As much as I appreciate the Parks, I wonder if they need more
budget than the Police and Fire Departments at this time.
I had reason to learn about, and then contact, the Housing
Navigator. I was favorably impressed and though I wish our
society did not need this kind of help, I am glad someone is there
helping our community.
I am concerned that the increases in salary will not be enough to
retain our staff, and that we will lose not only staff but their
knowledge. It is such a competitive environment. I am confident
that the management has studied this subject, but I'd sure
encourage a second look ... including being sure our City
Manager's salary is competitive.
Unless restricted by law, all correspondence to and from Roseville City
government offices, including information submitted through electronic forms such
as this one, may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act
and/or may be disclosed to third parties.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
2023PreliminaryLevyEXTIMATEDImpactstoHomesteadedSingleFamilyProperties
DependingonEstimatedMarketValues
$225,000ValuedHomesteadedSFResidentialProperty
CityManagerRecommendedBudgetmonthly
20222023$Chg.
PropertyTaxLevy:City62.00$$68.67$6.67
PropertyTaxLevy:EDA1.21$$1.15$(0.05)
CombinedTotal63.21$$69.82$6.61
$335,400MedianValuedHomesteadedSFResidentialProperty
CityManagerRecommendedBudgetmonthly
20222023$Chg.
PropertyTaxLevy:City91.90$$101.75$9.85
PropertyTaxLevy:EDA1.79$$1.71$(0.08)
CombinedTotal93.69$$103.46$9.77
$360,000ValuedHomesteadedSFResidentialProperty
CityManagerRecommendedBudgetmonthly
20222023$Chg.
PropertyTaxLevy:City100.75$$111.50$10.75
PropertyTaxLevy:EDA1.96$$1.87$(0.09)
CombinedTotal102.71$$113.37$10.66
$450,000ValuedHomesteadedSFResidentialProperty
CityManagerRecommendedBudgetmonthly
20222023$Chg.
PropertyTaxLevy:City124.00$$137.25$13.25
PropertyTaxLevy:EDA2.41$$2.30$(0.11)
CombinedTotal126.41$$139.55$13.14
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.: 10.a
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Approve Payments
1 B ACKGROUND
2 State Statute requires the City Council to approve all payment of claims. The following summary of claims
3 has been submitted to the City for payment.
4
Check Series # Amount
ACH Payments $1,562,118.34
104561-104678 $1,153,622.12
Total $2,715,740.46
5
6 A detailed report of the claims is attached. City Staff has reviewed the claims and considers them to be
7 appropriate for the goods and services received.
8 P OLICY O BJECTIVE
9 Under Mn State Statute, all claims are required to be paid within 35 days of receipt.
10 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
11 All expenditures listed above have been funded by the current budget, from donated monies, or from cash
12 reserves.
13 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
14 Staff recommends approval of all payment of claims.
15 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
16 Motion to approve the payment of claims as submitted
17
18 Prepared by: Mary Jenson, Accounting Technician
19 Attachments: A: Checks for Approval
20
Page 1 of 1
+ $2"#!3,$3141 1,$
+, -."/0.1
* -(AB!$),$
5)!-&
789:79:7::";"":&<=6>
6-1$ !.&
!"# $%!&"7897=9:7::";"789?89:7::
@/6@
'() !*)&"
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"?77"D!$!- 4"C0$.
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"8LM8<8AKL
"8LM8<8AKL
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SSQ$% %!*!$ "'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"TLA87
+-0!%%!-)"+ %!4);"SS#0$"C,-"NG!"#,)!)"U,40$ !!-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?LA88
"7
"7+(!-4(@);"SSQ*E4,(!!"#!3,%$1 1,$"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"L:AV:
"7S -1W,0"S,OO!!;"SS#0$"C,-"NG!"#,)!)"U,40$ !!-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"V<AV<
"7 !40X!;J,$"+ $2SG!32"' ,327897K9:7::":M?8LA:T
"7C12!)M"H$3A#!) -,,*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"K:?AL7
"7DC\[/;"SS>!*W!-)G1E" 0!);YA"Z!$ 789?<9:7::"=K7A77
"7D-!!$G P!$"6-1$ 1$%+0)1$!))"S -.)789?<9:7::"::TAV7
"7Y!OO@)"'A\[A'A" - 1$"\\"'!I!-"S4! $1$%#!) -,,*"'!-P13!789?<9:7::"V:7A77
"7J6Q\]#/;SS>!*W!-)G1E" 0!);#A"\[4),$789?<9:7::"?7=AL7
"7' *@)"S40W;SSU,40$ !!-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"??=A=:
"7N1*!"' P!-"\[OO"'1 !"'!3-! -1 4M"H$3A>!! 1$%">1$0 !)789?<9:7::"LK7A7?
"75'"+ $2;J,$"+ $2N!-*1$ 4"SG -%!);Y04(":7::7897K9:7::"<:A=7
"7U,4%1) 13);SSU,40$ !!-" W )!789?<9:7::":V<A77
"7_ 4!">!3G $13 4#6^"'!-P13!7897=9:7::":ML:?A=<
"?7<L8<>/>/;>! -,E,41 $"/-! "> $ %!*!$ /)),3A\]0$3G!,$;N-0.%!,$7897=9:7::"T:AL7
"?7<TV7C,-*)"\\"'() !*)",O">1$$!), + $$!-)M"N W4! G-,I)789?<9:7::"8L7A77
"?7<TV<D- 1$%!-"H$3'!$),-789?<9:7::"L7A<?
"?7<T<T>! -,E,41 $"S,0-1!-"S,-EAS,0-1!-"'!-P13!;/0%0) ":7::789?<9:7::"K??AV8
"?7<T<=>1$$!), "\[330E 1,$ 4"F! 4 G -0%M" \[N"QX *)789?<9:7::"?K?A77
"?7<TL?JC6"H$)0- $3!"'!-P13!)M"H$3A+'`HCNM"/S/"C!!789?<9:7::":M=<8A<7
"?7<T=7N,E"J, 3G"'!I!-"\\" - 1$"S4! $1$%M"H$3A> 1$41$!"'!-P13!789?<9:7::"?MVK7A77
"?7<T=:N-1"N!3G" 1)E!$)1$%M"H$3AH3!"> 3G1$!"'!-P13!789?<9:7::"?T7A77
"?<M<L8A8K
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
!E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"7/441!.">!.13 4"N- 1$1$%;SS6 -,4"N- 1$1$%789?<9:7::"K=LA77
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SS\[OO13!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"<KTAK7
"7/EE4!;SS16 .)789?<9:7::"?7MKK8A88
"7+(!-4(@);"SSH$ !-P1!I"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"=?A8:
"7S -1W,0"S,OO!!;"SSH$ !-P1!I"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?KAK8
"7S,) 3,;SS\[0 -! 3G"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"T8<A8=
"7 0$21$" ,$0 );SS\[0 -! 3G"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"=LA?:
"7Q32W!-%"\] **!-);SSS-1*1$ 4"Y0) 13!">!$ 4"F! 4 G"N- 1$1$%789?<9:7::":L8A77
"7Q*!-%!$3("/0 ,*, 1P!"N!3G"H$3#!4,3 !"# .1,"S,$ -,47897=9:7::"KK=A=7
"7Q*14("NG,-),$'0EE41!)"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 789?<9:7::":?A88
"7QP1.!$ "H$3;SSS-1*!"'3!$!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"8KAL<
"7C12!)M"H$3A#!) -,,*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::":=VAV:
"7D-!!$G P!$"6-1$ 1$%+0)1$!))"S -.)7897=9:7::":TKA??
"7F,*!" !E, ;"SS' 1,$"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?7:A:?
"76 $!- "+-! .;SSF1-1$%"6 $!4"\]0$3G!)789?<9:7::"T7A78
"7' - G"> G*0.'0EE41!)"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::"<=AV=
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::":MLK8AL7
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
"7'E!!.I (;SSC0!4789?<9:7::"LTVA??
"7' -!13G!-@)5$1O,-*"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"LM?7TAT=
"7' -!13G!-@);SSS'\["5$1O,-*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"??KA:K
"7'0W0-W $"/3!"F -.I -!;SSZ!("#1$%)789?<9:7::"?LA<?
"7'0$"S,$ -,4"\[O">J;"SS`1$.,I"N1$ 789?<9:7::"<7A77
"7N -%! ;"SS\[OO13!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"V8AV8
"75/U"S, 3G;SSH$P!) 1% 1,$"N- 1$1$%789?<9:7::"V:?A7L
"7541$!;SSQP1.!$ "#,,*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?K8AV=
"756'"' ,-!;"SSD-,0$."'G1EE1$%789?<9:7::"?:A?T
"7UC`;SS/0 ,"NG!O " ! 14"\]0$3G789?<9:7::"L7AT<
"7` 4* - ;SSN- 1$1$%"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"LTA?L
"7c3!4"Q$!-%(S1P14" !O!$)!7897=9:7::"KTAT=
"?7<LTL/)E!$">144)"H$3A5$1O,-*"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"?<TA=7
"?7<LTT/N\\N">,W141 (`1-!4!))"'!-P13!;/33 &"":K=:K<?=?L:K7897=9:7::"TT?A7K
"?7<LT=/X,$"Q$ !-E-1)!M"H$3AN )!-"H$) -03 1,$7897=9:7::"V=LA77
"?7<L=8D 44)M"\]\]SN 3 13 4">13"Z!!E!-7897=9:7::"8A88
"?7<L87\]!X1)J!X1)"#1)2" "> $ %!*!$ M"H$3AY04(;>1$1*0*"S,**1 *!$ 7897=9:7::"L7A77
"?7<L8V\]#D"N!3G$,4,%1!)M"H$3AN- 14!-"',4 -"#!E 1-7897=9:7::"?MV==A77
"?7<L8K\[>D"J 1,$ 4M"H$3A\[0 -! 3G"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"L<<A:K
"?7<T7760W413"Q*E4,(!!)"#! 1-!*!$ "/)),31 1,$\[*1 !." !.03 1,$"+1441$%);YA"'3G*1 R"6Q#7897=9:7::":7M<KKA<:
"?7<T7V# *)!("S,0$ ( 1)E 3G"'!-P13!;Y04(":7::7897=9:7::"V7M:?KALK
"?7<T??5$1P!-)1 (",O">1$$!), "U! !-1$ -(">!.13 4Z8"'!-P13!7897=9:7::":==ATK
"?7<T?LU!-1R,$S!44"6G,$!)7897=9:7::"?M7<7A:T
"=8ML7KA<?
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
!E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SSU!G134!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"T<TA:T
"7/EE4!;SSS4,0."'!-P13!)789?<9:7::"?A8K
"7+, -.",O"/!4)4 %1.;SS>!*W!-)G1E" 0!)"'A"'*1 G789?<9:7::"?::AL7
"7S,-E,- !"S,$$!3 1,$M"H$3AU!) )7897=9:7::"L=A<=
"7 P1)"\],32"\\"' O!;SSZ!(789?<9:7::"LAVT
"7 -!))!-"N- E"#,32M"H$3ASG1E)789?<9:7::"?M:L7A::
"7QW ("H$3;SS5$1O,-*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"=?A=?
"7Q*!-%!$3("/0 ,*, 1P!"N!3G"H$3U!G134!"5E. 1$%789?<9:7::"=7<AK:
"7C 3 ,-(">, ,-"6 - )M"S,AU!G134!"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"??<AV<
"7C ) !$ 4;SS' -!! "'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"L:AK<
"7C4!! 6-1.!U!G134!"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"8<A<K
"7F,41. (;SSH3!789?<9:7::"??A8K
"7Z G"C0!4"\[14"'!-P13!M"H$3AU!G134!"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"87A77
"7> 3d0!!$"Qe01E*!$ U!G134!"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::":M<7LA87
"7>J" !E ",O"#!P!$0!;J,$"+ $2:7:V"'E!31 4"C0!4"\]13!$)!7897K9:7::"?77AK?
"7\[OO13!" !E, ;"SS\[OO13!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?KKAV8
"76-!*10*"` !-)"H$3S,OO!!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"L7A??
"7'$ E"\[$;SSU!G134!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"T=LA8L
"7'E!!.I (;SS' -!! "'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"T7AT=
"7'0W0-W $"/3!"F -.I -!;SS' -!! "'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"??A88
"7c3!4"Q$!-%(' -!! 41%G )7897=9:7::"?=M<TTAVK
"?7<LT?/44) !"6! !-W14 ",O"',0 G"' A"6 04C14 !-)7897=9:7::"<L=A7V
"?7<L=7S1$ )"S,-E,- 1,$5$1O,-*"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"=8A:K
"?7<L=:S0) ,*"N-032"\[$!"',0-3!?:U">,$ -3G">, ,-7897=9:7::"VT<A77
"?7<L=KC-,$ 1!-"6-!31)1,$M"H$3A6,I!-"'0EE4("Z1 7897=9:7::"??=A77
"?7<LK?D,,.(! -"N1-!"\\"#0WW!-"S,*E $(U!G134!"'!-P13!7897=9:7::"?8:AL7
"?7<LK:D- 1$%!-"H$3U!G134!"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::":8:A=8
"?7<LKLY!OO"+!4R!-)"#,)!P144!"SG-()4!-" ,.%!"Y!!E"#/>U!G134!"'!-P13!7897=9:7::"8=TAL7
"?7<L8?\]1W!- ("N1-!"'!-P13!)M"\]\]SN1-!"#!3(341$%7897=9:7::":=KA:8
"?7<L886 - )"/441 $3!"J,- GU!G134!"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"TKA=<
"?7<T7<# *)!("S,0$ ("#!3,-.!-9#!%1) - -#!3,-.1$%"C!!;J, 13!",O"U 3 1,$;H. "/P!7897=9:7::"<TA77
"?7<T7='0W0-W $"N1-!"`G,4!) 4!M"H$3AU!G134!"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"?MTKKA:K
"?7<T7KN,I* ) !-U!G134!"'!-P13!7897=9:7::":ML?VA77
"?7<T?75$1P!-) 4"N-032"'!-P13!M"\]\]SY! !-"N-032"#!E 1-7897=9:7::"KM?7:AT<
"?7<T:?SQ'"H* %1$%''6">1$1*0*789?<9:7::"<7A77
"?7<T:K NJM"\]\]S/$$0 4" NJ"`! G!-"'!-P13!789?<9:7::":M<77A77
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
"?7<TV8Z,$- ."> !-1 4"' 4!)M"\]\]SA !!-("V=:V;S- 32"'! 4 $ 789?<9:7::"8M887A77
"?7<TL7J!I* $"'1%$)M"H$3A'1%$)789?<9:7::"?M?8=AK?
"?7<TLT6-!31)!">#>M"\]\]SC4 " "64 $789?<9:7::"KT<A77
"?7<TT?#S>"'E!31 4 1!)M"H$3AQ*04)1,$789?<9:7::":M:<LA<8
"?7<TT8N!-!X"5'/M"\]\]S+,,*"N-032"/$$0 4"H$)E!3 1,$789?<9:7::":ML?VA??
"LKMT?7AT:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
":<KML:KAKT
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&?77"D!$!- 4"C0$.
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"V
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"?7?"D!$!- 4"C0$." ,$ 1,$)
!E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"7` 4* - ;SSC0$"6,E)789?<9:7::":TAK:
":TAK:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
":TAK:
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&?7?"D!$!- 4"C0$." ,$ 1,$)
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"<
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"?7V"S,$ - 3 !."Q$%1$!!-1$%"'P3)
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"?M7:?A77
"?7<T?<USSM"\]\]SQ-,)1,$"S,$ -,4"Q)3-,I"#!O0$.;:V=7"C 1-P1!I7897=9:7::"?:M777A77
"?7<T:TS0) ,*"F,*!"+014.!-)"N1 4!M"\]\]SQ-,)1,$"S,$ -,4"Q)3-,I"#!O0$.;::T7"/3,-$"#, .789?<9:7::"LM8:7A8T
"?7<TV:D,4.!$"U 44!("\] $."S,*E $(Q-,)1,$"S,$ -,4"Q)3-,I"#!O0$.;\]!X1$% ,$789?<9:7::"LM:L7A77
"?7<T<KU1-%1$1B0)">,R!-1)Q-,)1,$"S,$ -,4"Q)3-,I"#!O0$.;K8<"N- $)1 "/P!789?<9:7::"?M?L7A77
"?7<TLK6-,E!- (N!3G"\]\]SQ-,)1,$"S,$ -,4"Q)3-,I"#!O0$.;T88"F!1$!4" -789?<9:7::"?M777A77
"?7<TT7# 1)1$%"S $!)Q-,)1,$"S,$ -,4"Q)3-,I"#QO0$.;:<:7"C 1-P1!I789?<9:7::":ML77A77
":KMK<?A8T
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"75'"+ $2;J,$"+ $2N!-*1$ 4"SG -%!);Y04(":7::7897K9:7::"VLAVK
"?7<T=?N- $)E,- 1,$"S,44 W,- 1P!"\\"S,$)04 $ )M"\]\]SF1%GI ("VT"6!.!) -1 $"+-1.%!"N!3G$13 4"/))1) $3!789?<9:7::"<MVLLA77
"<MV87AVK
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"VVM:V:AV<
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&?7V"S,$ - 3 !."Q$%1$!!-1$%"'P3)
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"L
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"?78"H$O,-* 1,$"N!3G$,4,%(
!E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"?7<T?LU!-1R,$S!44"6G,$!)7897=9:7::"<7A7?
"<7A7?
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"<7A7?
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&?78"H$O,-* 1,$"N!3G$,4,%(
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"T
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"??7"N!4!3,**0$13 1,$)
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"VML7TAT8
"VML7TAT8
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"7J,- G"'0W0-W $"/33!))"S,-EAY04(":7::">!! 1$%"'!-P13!)789?<9:7::"?MT<8AK7
"?7<TL:J,- G"'0W0-W $"S,**"S,**1))1,$S1 ("S,$ -1W0 1,$" ," G!"J'SS;V-."d -":7::789?<9:7::":<M:8KAL7
"?7<TLVJ() -,*"60W41)G1$%"S,M"H$3A'!E !*W!-9\[3 ,W!-"J!I)4! !-789?<9:7::"TMT:VA:?
"V:ML=?AL?
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"VTM7=KA:7
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&??7"N!4!3,**0$13 1,$)
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"=
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"??:"HN&"\[ G!-"/%!$3("\[E!- 1,$ 4
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"?8M:=VAT<
"?8M:=VAT<
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"76! -),$"U0!;SS>13-,),O "N- 1$1$%789?<9:7::":TLA77
"756'"' ,-!;"SSD-,0$."'G1EE1$%789?<9:7::"?:A?T
"7^!$!O1 )>! -,;HJQN"+!$!O1 )"/.*1$1) - 1,$7897=9:7::"??M?K7A77
"?7<LT:/44) -! *N!4!EG,$!7897=9:7::"V==A88
"?7<LT8S!$ 0-(\]1$2N!4!EG,$!7897=9:7::"<MTK<A78
"?7<L=?S,*3 ) H$ !-$! 7897=9:7::"?MVL:A7K
"?7<L=V /"F0* $"#!),0-3!)M"H$3AS4 ))1O13 1,$9S,*E!$) 1,$"' 0.(7897=9:7::"KM?77A77
"?7<L8=>#/";"NG!"> $ %!*!$ "/)),3M"H$3AJ!I">!*W!-)G1E" 0!)7897=9:7::"=77A77
"?7<T:<S,*3 ) H$ !-$! 789?<9:7::"8:AK=
":TM=T<A?8
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"<TM7V=AKV
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&??:"HN&"\[ G!-"/%!$3("\[E!- 1,$ 4
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"K
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"??<"HN&"H$P!$ ,-(";"/\]\]
!E - *!$ &"77"
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SS/$ !$$ 789?<9:7::":L7AKV
":L7AKV
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"
":L7AKV
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&??<"HN&"H$P!$ ,-(";"/\]\]
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"8
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&":77"#!3-! 1,$"C0$.
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7>J" !E ",O"#!P!$0!;J,$"+ $2' 4!)95)!"N X7897K9:7::":M8?TATV
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"??M<TLAT<
"?7<LT<6 04"/-$ R!$"Y-A'G!4 !-"#!$ 4M"Z!(" !E,)1 "#!O0$.7897=9:7::"LATK
"?<MVK=A8L
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7<"#!3-! 1,$
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SS\[P 4"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"V8VA:8
"7/ )02,"Y,G$),$F04 "H$) -03 1,$789?<9:7::"L=<A77
"7+(!-4(@);"SSS 2!789?<9:7::"?V:A7=
"7S,*3 ) ;SS6 -2"+014.1$%"5 141 1!)789?<9:7::"V7:A=:
"7S0W"C,,.);"SSJ 0-!)"Z1 3G!$"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"<KTA8?
"7 1-("d0!!$;SS'0**!-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"??<A=L
"7 2 -,$13);SS\[P 4"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"??LA77
"7 132@)"'E,- 1$%"D,,.);SS#0$"C,-"NG!"#,)!)"/I -.)789?<9:7::"L77A77
"7 ,44 -"N-!!;SS'0**!-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"::A=:
"7 - %,$"' -"'0E!-* -2! ;SS`,-4."Z1 3G!$"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::":A88
"7QW ("H$3;SS\[P 4"',0$."'() !*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"K?AL7
"7D-!!$G P!$"6-1$ 1$%+0)1$!))"S -.)789?<9:7::"TVAT?
"7F,WW("\],WW(;SS64 (%-,0$."'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"KA78
"7F,*!" !E, ;"SS\[P 4"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"L<KA7V
"7Y,)G"NG(%!)!$>14! %!"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::"?=?AV=
"7Z G1!"5-W $1 2U,44!(W 44"\[OO131 1$%7897=9:7::"?LTA77
"7\],1)"S0$$1$%G *SG 1-"_,% "H$) -03 1,$789?<9:7::":<TA<7
"7>13G !4);SSF/JS"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?TA7=
"7>, G!-"Q - G"D -.!$);SS60EE! "` %,$"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"V:A<?
"7J,I"\\"\] !-;SS#!3-! 1,$"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"<7A?L
"7\[OO13!" !E, ;"SS\[OO13!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"V7TAK7
"76 -2"+, -.;SS6 -21$%789?<9:7::"?:A77
"76 - ("S1 (;SS _6"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"<8AV8
"7' *@)"S40W;SS _6"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"V:8ALV
"7'3, "+-!0!->14! %!"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 789?<9:7::"K<A?8
"7'0W0-W $"/3!"F -.I -!;SS\[P 4"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?KA8L
"7N G,"'E,- )I! -M"H$3AN;'G1- )7897=9:7::":M:8LAV7
"7N -%! ;"SSH$41$!"S *E"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"T7TA77
"756'"' ,-!;"SSD-,0$."'G1EE1$%789?<9:7::"?<A<:
"75'/"H$O4 W4!);SSH$O4 W4!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?TA=7
"7` 4* - ;SS _6"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?<:AV?
"7`1441!">3S- (5*E1-!"'!-P13!7897=9:7::"?M<KKA77
"7`1441!">3S- (5*E1-!"'!-P13!789?<9:7::"?M<KKA77
"7c3!4"Q$!-%(J 0-!"S!$ !-7897=9:7::"T=TAK<
"?7<LTVF,I -."/$.!-),$Z!(" !E,)1 "#!O0$.7897=9:7::"L7A77
"?7<LT<6 04"/-$ R!$"Y-A'G!4 !-"#!$ 4M"Z!(" !E,)1 "#!O0$.7897=9:7::"?V:A77
"?7<L=<S -,4"Q324Z!(" !E,)1 "#!O0$.7897=9:7::"L7A77
"?7<L==/0.-!("C -13(>14! %!"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::"KTA:L
"?7<LKKZ1.3-! !"' 0.1,6 -2)"6-,%- *)7897=9:7::"LM?K7A77
"?7<T?:' $.- "5--0 1 Z!(" !E,)1 "#!O0$.7897=9:7::"L7A77
"?7<T:8/$.-! "C 1-W $2)`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4;\] $%0 %!"\]! -$1$%"/3 1P1 1!)789?<9:7::":77A77
"?7<TV?/$ G,$("C- $2`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4; -0*"\\" $3!"D-,0E789?<9:7::"?M777A77
"?7<TVL#132"D- P-,32`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4;U144 %!"D *!)789?<9:7::"?=LA77
"?7<TV=Z1.3-! !"' 0.1,D4,I"H$"NG!" -2"/0-,- "+,-! 41)"S4 ))789?<9:7::"T:7A77
"?7<T<:/$ ,$1 "\],I!44`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4;\] $%0 %!"\]! -$1$%"/3 1P1 1!)789?<9:7::":77A77
"?7<TL<\[$"'1 !"S,*E $1!;\[''NS#!) -,,*"#!$ 4789?<9:7::"?MLV:A=L
"?7<TLL> -2"6! !-),$`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4;',0$."N!3G789?<9:7::":L7A77
"?7<TT:6 04"#13!`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4;#131$%" !*,$) - 1,$)789?<9:7::"V77A77
"?7<TTVU1$3!$ "ZA"#,)!`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4;/3,0) 13"D01 -">0)13789?<9:7::":77A77
"?7<TT<6 *"'3GI!1 R!-`14."#13!"C!) 1P 4;' ,-!( !441$%789?<9:7::":77A77
":?M=T:AL?
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7<"#!3-! 1,$
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?7
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
"VTM?L7A<T
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&:77"#!3-! 1,$"C0$.
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"??
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&":7<"6"\\"#"S,$ - 3 "> $ !$ $3!
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"TM<:7A=:
"TM<:7A=:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7<"#!3-! 1,$
"7/$1 "NI -,)21>14! %!"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 789?<9:7::":K?A:L
"7+ 3G* $@);SS/-W,-! 0*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"K?ALV
"7S -41$"' 4!);SS6 -2"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"=LATL
"7S!- 1O1!."\] W,- ,-1!)M"H$3AS4! $1$%"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"8LVA=?
"7S0W"C,,.);"SS/-W,-! 0*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::":KA=<
"7 132@)"'E,- 1$%"D,,.);SS6 -2"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?=AK?
"7C ) !$ 4;SS6 -2"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"K:A?T
"7C12!)M"H$3A#!) -,,*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?M8VKAK7
"7D!- !$)"D-!!$G,0)!);SS/-W,-! 0*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::":?KA8K
"7F,*!" !E, ;"SS6 -2"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?7KA8<
"7\],I!);SS6 -2"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?<8A:L
"7>NH" 1) -1W0 1$%M"H$3A+!P!4"N,, G"D! -789?<9:7::"?M:KVATT
"76,,4)1.!;SS6,,4"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?K=A8?
"76-,I1-!M"H$3A/$$0 4"C1-!">,$1 ,-1$%789?<9:7::"?M7V:A77
"7'0W0-W $"/3!"F -.I -!;SS6 -2"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?7TATT
"7N\]C"C4,I!-);SS/-W,-! 0*"'0EE4!)789?<9:7::"KKAL:
"7541$!;SS6 -2"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"8:8A:?
"?7<LKTZ!$.!44" ,,-)"\\"F -.I -!M"\]\]S6 -2"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"L=<AL7
"?7<T78N-0%-!!$"6-,3!))1$%"S!$ !-N0-O"'!-P13!7897=9:7::"?7MLT?A??
"?7<T::S1$ )"S,-E,- 1,$5$1O,-*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?<A=7
"?7<TVTH) W!4"Z!!O!C,-!) -("6-,B!3 789?<9:7::"<K7A77
"?7<TVKZ144*!-"Q4!3 -13"S,AM"H$3A'E-1$24!-"+,,) !-"60*E"'!-P13!789?<9:7::":M7==A=K
"?7<TL=6-!31)1,$"\] $.)3 E!"\\"N-!!MH$3N-!!"'!-P13!789?<9:7::"8ML?KAL7
"?7<T==` %$!-)"D-!!$G,0)!)M"H$3A\] $.)3 E1$%"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?K=A8<
"V7M8=8AV?
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7<"#!3-! 1,$
"V=M<77A7V
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&:7<"6"\\"#"S,$ - 3 "> $ !$ $3!
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?:
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&":T7"S,**0$1 (" !P!4,E*!$
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"=MK=LAK8
"?7<LKVD-!() ,$!"S,$) -03 1,$S,$) -03 1,$" !E,)1 "#!O0$.;:<V7"S,0$ ("#, ."S7897=9:7::"LM777A77
"?:MK=LAK8
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SS\[OO13!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"<VA?=
"7D,'e>!! 1$%"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"??<AV?
"7' *@)"S40W;SS>!! 1$%"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::":KLAV=
"7N,24!"H$)E!3 1,$)M"H$3A/0%0) "Q4!3 -13 4"H$)E!3 1,$)789?<9:7::"??MK:8AT7
"75'"+ $2;J,$"+ $2N!-*1$ 4"SG -%!);Y04(":7::7897K9:7::"VML7KAT8
"?7<T:VS,+!32"S,$) -03 1,$"S,AM"\]\]S\[OO13!"#!*,.!4789?<9:7::":<M:LTA77
"?7<TTKN">,W14!S!44"6G,$!;/33 &""8T=V:VLV<789?<9:7::":KTA7V
"<7MV:VA?=
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"LVM?88A7T
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&:T7"S,**0$1 (" !P!4,E*!$
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?V
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&":TL"\]13!$)!"S!$ !-
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7>J" !E ",O"#!P!$0!;J,$"+ $2' 4!)95)!"N X7897K9:7::"?M8K7A?<
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"?<M?=LA?V
"?TM?LLA:=
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SSH "'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"8LA77
"7C12!)M"H$3A#!) -,,*"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::":7LAVK
"7C044"'4 !;SS>,$ G4("C!!789?<9:7::"<8A8L
"7> -(" - 3('0EE41!)"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 789?<9:7::"?V7A:<
"7' !P!$"+132!4>14! %!"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::"8TA<7
"7N!-!R "+ R 3>14! %!"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::"L=AV?
"75'6';SS6 ))E,- "6,) %!789?<9:7::"?M???ATL
"?M=<LA8V
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"?=M87?A:7
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&:TL"\]13!$)!"S!$ !-
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?<
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&":K:"
!E - *!$ &"7:"
"7'FH"H$ !-$ 1,$ 4"S,-E/#6/"S,*E0 !-"',O I -!7897=9:7::":M7==A77
"?7<LK<F!$-("'3G!1$M"H$3AQE1$!EG-1$!"'(-1$7897=9:7::"?=:AL:
":M:<8AL:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7:"
":M:<8AL:
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&:K:"
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?L
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&":87"6,413!"C,-O!1 0-!"C0$.
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"T?A=T
"T?A=T
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"T?A=T
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&:87"6,413!"C,-O!1 0-!"C0$.
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?T
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&":8L"6,413!""D- $ )
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::":<8A?K
":<8A?K
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"7F 1P("U $%N- 1$1$%">! 4)"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::"=7A?=
"7J132"\[4),$N- 1$1$%">! 4)"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::"8<A<:
"?T<AL8
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"<?VA==
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&:8L"6,413!""D- $ )
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?=
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"<77"6,413!"U!G134!"#!P,4P1$%
!E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"7Q*!-%!$3("/0 ,*, 1P!"N!3G"H$3U!G134!"5E. 1$%7897=9:7::"TM7:7ALT
"7^,44">!.13 4"S,-E;SS/Q "Qe01E*!$ 789?<9:7::"KVA8V
"?7<LK8Z1!)4!-@)"6,413!"'0EE4(M"H$3A'1.! -*)"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"?M=L?AL7
"=MKLLA88
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7:"60W413"' O! (
"=MKLLA88
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&<77"6,413!"U!G134!"#!P,4P1$%
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?K
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"<7V"60W413"`,-2)"U!G134!"#!P,4P1$%
!E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"7S-() !!4"N-032"Qe01E*!$ M"H$3A64,I"'!-P13!789?<9:7::"8M8K=A77
"7\]13!$)!"S!$ !-;J,$"+ $2C,-."C:L7"N X"\\"#!%1) - 1,$7897K9:7::"?M8=VA8:
"??M8T7A8:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"??M8T7A8:
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&<7V"60W413"`,-2)"U!G134!"#!P,4P1$%
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"?8
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"<78"S!$ - 4"'P3)""Qe01E"#!P,4P1$%
!E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"?7<T:= !O1$1 1P!"N!3G$,4,%("',40 1,$M"H$3A\[OO13!"> 3G1$!)"#!$ 4789?<9:7::"VMLK7AV:
"VMLK7AV:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"VMLK7AV:
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&<78"S!$ - 4"'P3)""Qe01E"#!P,4P1$%
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":7
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"<?7"+014.1$%"H*E-,P!*!$ )
!E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"?7<T:VS,+!32"S,$) -03 1,$"S,AM"\]\]S\[OO13!"#!*,.!4789?<9:7::"=VM7=KA77
"=VM7=KA77
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7?"D!$!- 4"D,P!-$*!$
"=VM7=KA77
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&<?7"+014.1$%"H*E-,P!*!$ )
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":?
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"<?="+,04!P -."\] $.)3 E1$%
!E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"?7<T=VNI1$"S1 ("\] I$3 -!"\\"\] $.)3 E!>,$ G4("H$) 44*!$ ;'!E !*W!-":7::789?<9:7::"TMK=7AKV
"TMK=7AKV
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"TMK=7AKV
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&<?="+,04!P -."\] $.)3 E1$%
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"::
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"L:8"DA\[A"F,0)1$%"#!P!$0!"a:778b
!E - *!$ &"?:" !W "'!-P13!
"7+,$."N-0) "'!-P13!"S,-E;J,$"+ $2H$ !-!) "6 (*!$ )7897K9:7::"KM:?:AL7
"KM:?:AL7
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"?:" !W "'!-P13!
"KM:?:AL7
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&L:8"DA\[A"F,0)1$%"#!P!$0!"a:778b
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":V
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"LV:":7?:"6,- "/0 G,-1 ("+,$.
!E - *!$ &"?:" !W "'!-P13!
"7+,$."N-0) "'!-P13!"S,-E;J,$"+ $2H$ !-!) "6 (*!$ )7897K9:7::"??=M<L7A77
"??=M<L7A77
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"?:" !W "'!-P13!
"??=M<L7A77
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&LV:":7?:"6,- "/0 G,-1 ("+,$.
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":<
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"LVV":7?L"NHC"+,$.)"a:7?L/b
!E - *!$ &"?:"
"7+,$."N-0) "'!-P13!"S,-E;J,$"+ $2H$ !-!) "6 (*!$ )7897K9:7::"V<M=:KA?V
"V<M=:KA?V
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"?:"
"V<M=:KA?V
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&LVV":7?L"NHC"+,$.)"a:7?L/b
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":L
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"L87"' -!! "S,$) -03 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"?7<L8T>$" !E ",O"N- $)E,- 1,$S,$) -03 1,$"/%-!!*!$ 7897=9:7::"TMTT7A8V
"TMTT7A8V
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"TMTT7A8V
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&L87"' -!! "S,$) -03 1,$
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":T
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"L8:"' -!! "S,$) -03 1,$";":7::
!E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"7+1 0*1$,0)"#, .I ()"H$36 P!*!$ "> $ %!*!$ "6-,B!3 789?<9:7::"L<8M<8KA78
"L<8M<8KA78
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7V"60W413"`,-2)
"L<8M<8KA78
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&L8:"' -!! "S,$) -03 1,$";":7::
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":=
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"T77"' $1 -("'!I!-
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"?M<LLA?<
"?7<T<L>! -,E,41 $"S,0$314'/S"SG -%!);/0%0) ":7::789?<9:7::"VTM87:A:L
"VKMVL=AV8
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7L"' $1 -("'!I!-
"7+1 0*1$,0)"#, .I ()"H$36 P!*!$ "> $ %!*!$ "6-,B!3 789?<9:7::"?MT8?A77
"7+40!O1$"6 (*!$ "'() !*);J,$"+ $25+"6 (*!$ )A3,*"SG -%!)"Y04(":7::7897K9:7::"??M:7?A7=
"7SHN"'!I!-"',40 1,$)N!4!P1)1,$" -,E"S,$$!3 1,$7897=9:7::"<MT?TA77
"7C4!X1W4!"61E!"N,,4"S,*E $(S!- *13"H$)!- 789?<9:7::"?V:A<7
"7Y,)G"H**!-* $+,, )"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 789?<9:7::":=8A8K
"?7<L8L>3 ,$,0%G@)"'!I!-"'!-P13!M"H$3AS,**!-31 4"D0RR41$%7897=9:7::"LM78?AL7
"?7<T?T` !-"S,$)!-P 1,$"'!-P13!M"H$3A\]! 2"\],3 1,$"'!-P13!7897=9:7::"T:8AVK
"?7<T<8S 4!W"J!IW('!I!-"+ 32"5E"S4! $0E"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 789?<9:7::"87LA77
"?7<TL8dV"S,$ - 3 1$%M"H$3AN- OO13"S,$ -,4"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"K<<AT7
"?7<T=LU 44!("#13G"S,AM"H$3AQe01E*!$ "#$ 4789?<9:7::"LMLLKA<L
"V7M8<8AVK
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7L"' $1 -("'!I!-
"T8MV7TA==
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&T77"' $1 -("'!I!-
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":K
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"T?7"` !-"C0$.
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7>J" !E ",O"#!P!$0!;J,$"+ $2' 4!)95)!"N X7897K9:7::":=M<<7A8?
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"VM<:?A<T
"?7<LTKQ#JQ'N"+#\[ N>/JJ#!O0$."SG!32"77=??V;777M"?=?7""#H DQ`\[\[ "\]J"'\[7897=9:7::"=7A<7
"?7<L=LNF\[>/'"Q\]H\[#!O0$."SG!32"7:<?=?;777M":KK=""F/>\]HJQ7897=9:7::"8:?AKV
"?7<LK7N\[ "\\">HSFQ\]\]Q"D\[\[ `HJ#!O0$."SG!32"7::<:7;777M"?=TT""/\]/>Q 7897=9:7::"LV<A8=
"?7<T7:/\]HSQ"#/>\]Q##!O0$."SG!32"77L7:V;777M"L:8""\]\[UQ\]7897=9:7::"=LA7K
"?7<T7T'Q#QJHN_"'F/JZ\]HJ#!O0$."SG!32"7:7T?:;777M":::7"">Q##H\]7897=9:7::"V?8AV=
"?7<T?K/*!)"S,$) -03 1,$M"H$3AF(.- $ ">! !-"#!O0$.789?<9:7::"?M788A=L
"?7<T?8>/#_"+#QJJ/J;#\[J/_JQ#!O0$."SG!32"77T:L8;777M":8L:"">/#H\[J"'N789?<9:7::"K8AKT
"?7<T:7>/#_"+#\[`J#!O0$."SG!32"77K8L?;777M":?KL""'N"S#\[Hc"'N789?<9:7::":VA??
"?7<TVV^FQJD_H"D\[JD#!O0$."SG!32"7:<7:V;777M"?7L:""\]\[UQ\]789?<9:7::"TLA?=
"?7<T<?ZQUHJ"\]Q`H'#!O0$."SG!32"7:<:=7;777M"VTL""+#\[\[Z'789?<9:7::"??LATL
"?7<T<V/\]Qc/J Q#"F'HQF"\]_"ZHQ5"N#5\[JD#!O0$."SG!32"7:?87V;777M"::V8""C5\]F/>"'N789?<9:7::"?VKA8T
"?7<T<<'/J #/">/#Z'#!O0$."SG!32"77V7<T;777M":T<L""C/##HJDN\[J"'N789?<9:7::"KKAVK
"?7<TT=F/##HQN"'N#/'+Q#D#!O0$."SG!32"7?T77L;777M":T7L""#\['Q789?<9:7::"L8A7K
"?7<T=T>HZQ"UH#JHD#!O0$."SG!32"7?8T??;777M":TL"`"S\["# "+789?<9:7::"=8AL:
"V<ML<VAL7
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7T"` !-"C0$.
"7/W4!"F,)!"\\"#0WW!-"H$3J,RR4!)7897=9:7::"?T8AL7
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SSC4,,-"> )789?<9:7::"8TALL
"7/*!-13 $"Q$%1$!!-1$%"N!) 1$%M"H$3AS,$) -03 1,$"> !-1 4)"N!) 1$%789?<9:7::"<MVKKA77
"7+1 0*1$,0)"#, .I ()"H$36 P!*!$ "> $ %!*!$ "6-,B!3 789?<9:7::"?MT8?A77
"7+,W"J,-W(+,, )"#!1*W0-)!*!$ 7897=9:7::":V=A88
"7S1 (",O"#,)!P144!;"J,$"+ $2S1 ("` !-"+144);Y04(":7::7897K9:7::"??MVV<A?K
"7C!."QX;SSD-,0$."'G1EE1$%789?<9:7::"?LAT8
"7C!-%0),$"` !-I,-2)"f:L?K` !-9>! !-"'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"LM??LA<=
"7C!-%0),$"` !-I,-2)"f:L?K` !-9>! !-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"K:LA77
"7'D6"S,$ - 3 1$%M"H$3A\]!X1$% ,$"/P!"` !-"> 1$7897=9:7::"?:M777A77
"7'G!-I1$"`1441 *)6 1$ "'0EE41!)7897=9:7::"<=7AVT
"7'G!-I1$"`1441 *)6 1$ 789?<9:7::"L<?A?<
"7'0W0-W $"/3!"F -.I -!;SS` !-9>! !-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?8A88
"7` 4* - ;SS` !-9>! !-"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::":?A<<
"?7<T7?dV"S,$ - 3 1$%M"H$3AS0-W"#!E4 3!*!$ 7897=9:7::"?MT:LA7L
"?7<T?VU 44!("#13G"S,AM"H$3AQe01E*!$ 7897=9:7::"?7MT=8AK8
"?7<T?=/.P $3!."Q$%1$!!-1$%"\\"Q$P1-,$*!$ 4"'!-P13!)M"H$3'S/ /"'!-P13!)789?<9:7::"<VTA77
"?7<T?K/*!)"S,$) -03 1,$M"H$3AF(.- $ ">! !-"#!O0$.789?<9:7::;<VAV<
"?7<T:LS,**!-31 4"/)EG 4 "S,/)EG 4 789?<9:7::":M<=VA=T
"?7<TTT' A"6 04"#!%1,$ 4"` !-"'!-P13!)` !-789?<9:7::"TK=MKV8AV<
"?7<T=<NI1$"S1 ("` !-"S41$13M"H$3AS,4,O,-*"+ 3 !-1 "' *E4!)789?<9:7::"TK7A77
"=<7MT?=A7?
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7T"` !-"C0$.
"==LM?T7AL?
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&T?7"` !-"C0$.
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!":8
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"T:7"D,4O"S,0-)!
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7>J" !E ",O"#!P!$0!;J,$"+ $2' 4!)95)!"N X7897K9:7::"VM8KVAV:
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"?M:<?AVV
"LM::<ATL
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7="D,4O"S,0-)!
"7/* R,$A3,*;"SS+ !-1!)789?<9:7::":?VAT=
"7 0$21$" ,$0 );SSD,4O"N,0-$ *!$ "'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"K7A<K
"7QS#';SS6,1$ ",O"' 4!">,$ G4("C!!789?<9:7::"?<7A:?
"7C ) )1%$);SS#,)!O!) "6 - .!"'1%$)789?<9:7::"TTA<7
"7D- $1 !"S1 (;SS8"\\" 1$!">! 4)789?<9:7::"==:A?T
"7\[OO13!" !E, ;"SS#!3!1E "6 E!-M"C4 )G" -1P!789?<9:7::"L=A::
"7#!) 0- $ " !E, ;"SSS,$3!))1,$"H !*)"O,-"#!) 4!789?<9:7::"T?8A8V
"7'0W0-W $"/3!"F -.I -!;SSD,4O"S,0-)!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?KAT=
"7N -%! ;"SSY0$1,-"\]! %0!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"VTAT?
"75'"+ $2;J,$"+ $2N!-*1$ 4"SG -%!);Y04(":7::7897K9:7::"?M==TA8=
"?7<L=T P!"Q-132),$:7::"'!$1,-"S $3!-"+!$!O1 7897=9:7::"::KA=L
"<M7??A7=
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7="D,4O"S,0-)!
"8M:VLA=:
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&T:7"D,4O"S,0-)!
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"V7
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"T<7"' ,-*" - 1$ %!
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"VM:7<A<V
"VM:7<A<V
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
!E - *!$ &"7K"' ,-*"` !-
"7+1 0*1$,0)"#, .I ()"H$36 P!*!$ "> $ %!*!$ "6-,B!3 789?<9:7::"?TM8<KA77
"7\[OO13!" !E, ;"SS\[OO13!"'0EE41!)789?<9:7::"?K7A7V
"7N1*!"' P!-"\[OO"'1 !"'!3-! -1 4M"H$3A>!! 1$%">1$0 !)789?<9:7::"?87AL7
"7`'+"\\"/)),31 !)M"H$3AJ,- G"N- 14"S04P!- " !)1%$789?<9:7::"?VM=TTAL7
"7c3!4"Q$!-%(S,*E,) "'1 !"'!30-1 ("\]1%G 7897=9:7::":7A:=
"?7<T:K NJM"\]\]S/$$0 4" NJ"`! G!-"'!-P13!789?<9:7::":M<77A77
"?7<T=K` !-O-,$ "#!) ,- 1,$`!!."S,$ -,4789?<9:7::"LM<:LA77
"VKM8V7AV7
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"7K"' ,-*"` !-
"<:M?V<A=V
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&T<7"' ,-*" - 1$ %!
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"V?
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"TL7"',41."` ) !"#!3(34!
!E - *!$ &"78"#!3(34!
"7Q0-!2 "#!3(341$%S0-W)1.!"#!3(341$%789?<9:7::"TLMK8VAKT
"?7<TTL'G-!.;J;D,M"H$3A#!3(341$%"'!-P13!789?<9:7::":V7A?T
"TTM?:<A7:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"78"#!3(34!
"TTM?:<A7:
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&TL7"',41."` ) !"#!3(34!
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"V:
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"=77"`,-2!-)"S,*E!$) 1,$
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"?7<T7L'C>`,-2"S,*E"/.*1$;6,413(&""V<:<77897=9:7::"?MKVLA77
"?MKVLA77
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"?MKVLA77
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&=77"`,-2!-)"S,*E!$) 1,$
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"VV
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"=?7"#1)2"> $ %!*!$
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7 !4 " !$ 4"64 $",O">1$$!), 9 >J !$ 4"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897=9:7::"KMVL7AK:
"?7<T<7\]! %0!",O">J"S1 1!)"H$)"N-0) "6\\S6-,E!- (9S )0 4 ("S,P!- %!"6-!*10*;/33 &""?777:=8K789?<9:7::"L<M8:<A77
"TVM:=<AK:
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"TVM:=<AK:
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&=?7"#1)2"> $ %!*!$
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"V<
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"=:V"F#/"\[E!- 1$%"C0$.
!E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"7S!$ !-"O,-"Q$!-%(" $."Q$P1-,$*!$ '!$1,-" !O!--!.;#,))1$1"<V<"S,0$ ("#, ."+:"`7897=9:7::"::M87=A77
"::M87=A77
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"D!$!- 4"C0$3 1,$
"::M87=A77
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&=:V"F#/"\[E!- 1$%"C0$.
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"VL
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
C0$.&"=:L"Q /"\[E!- 1$%"C0$.
!E - *!$ &"77"
"7S!$ !-"O,-"Q$!-%(" $."Q$P1-,$*!$ '!$1,-" !O!--!.;#,))1$1"<V<"S,0$ ("#, ."+:"`7897=9:7::"?M777A77
"7J! I,-2"',40 1,$);"SS ,* 1$"J *!)789?<9:7::":K8AK8
"7',0-3!I!44;J,$"+ $2F! 4 G"H$)0- $3!"6-!*10*;/0%0) ":7::7897K9:7::"?M<:LAT7
"75-W $"\] $."H$) 1 0 !;"SS>!*W!-)G1E" 0!);D0$.4 3G789?<9:7::"T77A77
"?7<LK=Z!$$!.("\\"D- P!$M"SG - !-!.D!$!- 4"\]!% 4"'!-P13!)7897=9:7::"T:<A77
"VM8V8A<8
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"77"
!E - *!$ &"?7"
"7Q.1),$"/E - *!$ );J,$"+ $2\]S /"D- $ "C0$.)">! "S,0314"O,-"Q.1),$"',4 -"N- $)O!-7897K9:7::"VV7MVLTA77
"VV7MVLTA77
N, 4"O,-" !E - *!$ &"?7"
"VV<M:8LA<8
N, 4"O,-"C0$.&=:L"Q /"\[E!- 1$%"C0$.
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"VT
!"#$%&' ()%*+,-./%0 1*2(32!45%(#6 3!*5.45%(624 7-%8(4
":M=?LM=<7A<T
D- $."N, 4
+#;+, -."/0.1 "a789:79:7::";"":&<="6>b
6 %!"V=
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date:September 26, 2022
Item No.: 10.b
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Approve 1 Temporary Liquor License
1 B ACKGROUND
2 Chapter 301 of the City Code requires all applications for business and other licenses to be submitted to the City
3 Council for approval. The following application is submitted for consideration:
4
5 Temporary Liquor License
6 Roseville Lutheran Church
7 1215 Roselawn Ave W
8 Roseville, MN 55113
9
10 Roseville Lutheran Church will be hosting Oktoberfest on October 14, 2022. The event will take place in the south
11 parking lot.
12
13 P OLICY O BJECTIVE
14 Required by City Code
15 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
16 The correct fees were paid to the City at the time the application(s) were made.
17 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
18 Staff has reviewed the application(s) and has determined that the applicant(s) meet all City requirements. Staff
19 recommends approval of the license(s).
20 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
21 Motion to approve the Temporary Liquor License.
Prepared by: Katie Bruno, Deputy City Clerk
Attachments: A: Application
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date:
Item No.:
Department ApprovalCity Manager Approval
Item Description:Approve General Purchases Exceeding $10,000 or Sale of Surplus Items
B ACKGROUND
1
2 CityCodesection103.05establishestherequirementthatallgeneralpurchasesorcontractsinexcessof
3$10,000beseparatelyapprovedbytheCityCouncil,independentofthebudgetprocessorother
4 statutorypurchasingrequirements.Inaddition,StateStatutesgenerallyrequiretheCounciltoauthorize
5 thesaleofsurplusvehiclesandequipment.AttachmentA-1includesalistofitemssubmittedforCouncil
6 review and approval.
7
8 Staffwillnotethatunlessnotedotherwise,allitemscontainedinthisreportwerepreviouslyidentified
9 andincludedintheadoptedbudgetorCapitalImprovementPlan(CIP)submittedforCouncilreview
10 duringthemostrecentbudgetcycle.ThisinformationpackageincludedaCIPProject/Initiative
11 summarywhichidentifiedthetypeofpurchase,estimatedcost,fundingsource,andothersupporting
12 narrative.Whereapplicable,theseproject/initiativesummariesareincludedwithAttachmentA-2.Please
13 notethatduetolongleadtimesinordervs.delivery,thereareCIPitemsnotedfor2023.The2023-2042
14 CIP will be adopted December 5, 2022. Therefore, we have not included approved CIP narratives.
15
16 Attachment B includes a summary-to-date of the CIP purchases for 2022.
17
P OLICY O BJECTIVE
18
19 Required under City Code 103.05.
F INANCIAL I MPACTS
20
21 Funding for all items is provided for in the current budget or through pre-funded capital replacement funds.
S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
22
23 StaffrecommendstheCityCouncilapprovethesubmittedpurchasesorcontractsforserviceandwhere
24 applicable; authorize the sale/trade-in of surplus items.
R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
25
26 Motiontoapprovethesubmittedpurchasesorcontractsforservicesandwhereapplicable;thesale/trade-
27 in of surplus items.
28
29
Prepared by:Joshua Kent, AssistantFinance Director
Attachments:A1:Over $10,000 Items for Purchase or Sale/Trade-in
A2:CIP Project/Initiative summary (if applicable)
B:2022 CIP Purchase Summary
Page1 of 2
Attachment A-1
General Purchases or Contracts
BudgetP.O.Budget /
DivisionVendorDescriptionKeyAmountAmountCIP
Police DepartmentWhitewater Chrysler Dodge JeepReplacement Vehicle - 2022 Jeep Compass Latitude LUX(a)$32,800
Park MaintenanceMagic TurfBallfield Repairs to Legion Field(b)$30,000$29,7772023 CIP
Key
Purchase of the 2022 Jeep Compass Latitude LUX is to replace an unmarked vehicle that was recently involved in an
(a)accident. The vehicle that was involved in an accident will be auctioned off and proceeds will go to help recoupe the cost of
the purchase of the Jeep.
Repairs to Central Park Legion Baseball Field due to heavy use and wear and tear. Roseville Area Youth Baseball and
(b)the Roseville Baseball Boosters will also be contributing to the project to reduce the actual impact to the Parks
Improvement Plan budget.
Page2 of 2
City of Roseville Attachment B
2022 Summary of Scheduled CIP Items
OriginalRevised
CouncilP.O.BudgetBudgetYTD
ApprovalAmountAmountAmountActualDifference
Administration
Voting Equipment$ 19,55515,000$ (4,555)$
HR Software Upgrade5,000 -$ 5,000
Council Tablets -3,000$ 3,000
Central Services
Copier & Postage Machine Lease84,400 26,872 57,528
Police
Marked squad cars (4 / yr)1/10/2022135,877$ 136,000 - 136,000
Unmarked vehicles (1 / yr)1/10/202230,388 24,000 - 24,000
Squad conversion,seats, control box79,000 4,421 74,579
Radar Units -6,200 6,200
Stop Sticks -1,030 1,030
Computer Equipment8,800 - 8,800
RMS Migration/replacement1/10/2022135,134 205,000 - 205,000
Speed notification unit10,000 - 10,000
Non-lethal weapons -8,000 8,000
Long guns replacement14,420 - 14,420
Sidearm parts (officers)2,060 - 2,060
Tactical gear -6,500 6,500
Crime scene equipment3,000 - 3,000
Body Worn Camera Equipment1/10/202275,000 77,000 3,334 73,666
Digital Interview Room Equipment15,450 - 15,450
Investigation Conf. Room2,500 - 2,500
Defibrillators -1,575 1,575
Shredder -5,150 5,150
Radio Equipment1/10/202226,890 27,000 25,100 1,900
Office furniture -8,400 8,400
Dishwasher -2,060 2,060
Fire
Records Management System (RMS)29,000 - 29,000
Cardiac Monitoring and Response Equipment60,000 5,389 54,611
Portable and mobile radios20,000 - 20,000
Fire admin- office furniture2,500 - 2,500
Training room tables & chairs15,000 - 15,000
Day room chairs -8,000 8,000
Public Works
#106 3-ton dump w/ plo230,000 212,058 17,942
#133 - Walk behind saw10,000 - 10,000
#111 Bobcat 78" grapple bucket5,000 - 5,000
Street Signs -10,000 10,000
Hydraulic Press 1995 5,4705,000 (470)
Parks & Recreation
#517 Ford F350 SD (2013)40,000 - 40,000
#515 Ford 350 w. plow (2018)40,000 - 40,000
#516 Ford with plow (2013)40,000 - 40,000
Skating Center Plow Truck (2002)20,000 - 20,000
#504 Kubota Drag Tractor (2011)35,000 35,000
General Facility Improvements
Police & PW garage Co2/No2 detectors10,000 - 10,000
workstation replacement city hall1/10/202287,830 350,000 90,040 259,960
Maintenance Facility Pressure Washer5,000 - 5,000
COMM Council Control/Sound System7,000 - 7,000
COMM Council Furniture15,000 - 15,000
Commons: South Entry RTU (2007)20,000 - 20,000
Arena: Roof (2004) -10,000 10,000
OVAL Renovate Banquet Facilitiy/Rooftops217,000 - 217,000
OVAL Lobby Mechanical/Banquet Roof (1993)300,000 - 300,000
OVAL Bathroom Remodel (Upper)101,000 - 101,000
OVAL: Contingency and Soft costs (35%)126,000 - 126,000
Hallway wall paper -5,000 5,000
Training room paint -2,000 2,000
Exercise room-flooring3,000 - 3,000
Bay painting -25,000 25,000
Fire: Security system -3,000 3,000
Fire: Heat pumps (24)10,000 - 10,000
Concrete Exterior -10,000 10,000
Exterior Lighting -3,000 3,000
Interior Lighting -3,000 3,000
Parking Lot -50,000 50,000
Information Technology
Computers (Notebooks, Desktop)35,000 31,394 3,606
Monitor/Display -5,175 5,175
Network Printers/Copiers/Scanners (13)17,000 - 17,000
Network Switches/Routers/Wireless (Roseville)25,000 - 25,000
Power/UPS - Closets (11)400 - 400
Surveillance Cameras (58)7,890 - 7,890
Agenda Software -6,200 6,200
Website redesign -17,000 17,000
Park Improvements
Tennis & Basketball Courts50,000 - 50,000
Playground Areas2/14/202245,000 550,000 800,000 46,950 503,050
Playground Areas3/21/2022250,000
Natural Resources -220,000 220,000
PIP/CIP Category -200,000 200,000
Street Improvements
Mill & overlay - local streets1,200,000 - 1,200,000
Former Seal Coat Dollars Spent as Mill and Overlay250,000 - 250,000
Cty Rd B, Snelling-Lexington105,000 - 105,000
Cty Rd B2/Lexington100,000 - 100,000
2022 PMP -362,000 362,000
Cleveland, Iona-Colder60,000 - 60,000
Lexington Pedestrian50,000 - 50,000
Hamline&TH 36 Signals78,600 - 78,600
Rice, Larpentuer - Cty B250,000 - 250,000
Street Lighting
Pedestrian light @ Lexington Central Prk20,000 - 20,000
Signal Pole Painting (3 every other year)20,000 - 20,000
Pathways & Parking Lots
Pathway maintenance150,000 23,006 126,994
Lexington Pk off Cty B(1999)20,000 - 20,000
License Center
General office equipment (minor)1,000 - 1,000
Office chair replacement1,200 - 1,200
Community Development
Computers/monitors -600 600
Office Furniture 3,2001,000 (2,200)
Water
Replace Water Tower Fence30,000 - 30,000
Water main replacement *800,000 - 800,000
Sanitary Sewer
#202 1-ton with dump box/plow70,000 - 70,000
LS repairs/upgrades -20,000 20,000
Dale/Owasso LS Rehab45,000 - 45,000
Long Lake Lift Station380,000 - 380,000
Sewer main repairs900,000 - 900,000
Storm Sewer
#139 Vacall1/10/2022305,367 280,000 305,367 (25,367)
Field Computer Add/Replacements5,000 - 5,000
General Lift Station Repairs20,000 - 20,000
Pond improvements/infiltration400,000 - 400,000
Storm sewer replacement/rehabilitationPMP3/21/202248,750 500,000 - 500,000
Golf Course
Golf Shared with RSC Ford F150 Truck (2012)20,000 - 20,000
Golf: 1994 Cushman Utilities Cart Replacement8/22/20229,443 30,000 - 30,000
Golf: 2002 Greens Mower Replacement8/22/202241,122 37,000 - 37,000
Golf: Gas Pump / Tank: Replacement - 196716,000 - 16,000
Golf: Course Safety Netting Replacement 199710,000 - 10,000
Total - All Items9,961,110$ 802,155$ 9,158,955$
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.: 10.d
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description:Accept Public Improvements Related to The Enclave at McCarrons Lake
Public Improvement Contract
1 B ACKGROUND
2 On March 22, 2021, the City Council approved the Public Improvement Contract (PIC) with
3 Airborne McCarrons, LLC, for development work related to The Enclave at McCarrons Lake
4 development, located on the corner of Galtier Avenue and South McCarrons Boulevard. The new
5 public infrastructure included new water and sewer mains to serve the development. Additionally,
6 the developer graded and dedicated a trail easement for the Marion Street pathway connection
7 between Marion Streetand South McCarrons Boulevard which the City paved in 2021.
8 All public improvements were completed to the City’s satisfaction in 2020. In order to close out the
9 PIC, a resolution (Attachment A) from the City Council is needed accepting the improvements.
10 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
11 All project costs related to the PIC were paid for by the developer. No further costs are associated
12 with the PIC.
13 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
14 The work completed was in accordance with the PIC. Staff recommends the City Council approve a
15 resolution accepting the public improvements related to The Enclave at McCarrons Lake Public
16 Improvement Contract.
17 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
18 Motion to adopt the resolution accepting the public improvements related to The Enclave at
19 McCarrons Lake Public Improvement Contract.
Prepared by: Jesse Freihammer, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer
Attachments: A: Resolution
B: Public Improvement Contract
Page 1 of 1
Attachment A
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
th
2 of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 26 day of September,
3 2022, at 6:00 p.m.
4
5 The following members were present: and the following members were
6 absent: .
7
8 Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
9
10 RESOLUTION No.
11
12 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE ENCLAVE AT
13 MCCARRONS LAKE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
14
15 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, as follows:
16
17 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City on March 22, 2021,
18 Airborne McCarrons, LLC, has satisfactorily completed the public improvements
19 associated with The Enclave at McCarrons Lake Public Improvement Contract.
20
21 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
22 ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA, that the work completed under said contract is hereby
23 accepted and approved; and
24
25 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
26 Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
27 favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: .
28
29 WHEAREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Accepting Public Improvements - The Enclave at McCarrons Lake
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council
th
held on the 26
day of September, 2022, with the original thereof on file in my office.
th
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this the 26 day of September, 2022.
Patrick Trudgeon, City Manager
(SEAL)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.: 10.e
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Approve Partial Release of Public Improvements Related to the Twin Lakes
rd
3Addition Public Improvement Contract
1 B ACKGROUND
2 On July 13, 2020, the City Council approved the Public Improvement Contract (PIC)
3 (Attachment B) with Roseville Investment Partners, LLC, for development work related to Twin
rd
4 Lakes 3Addition development, located north of County Road C atHerschel Street. The new
5 public infrastructure included intersection improvements to County Road C/Herschel Street, a new
6 signal light, turn lanes, storm sewer and other miscellaneous work. All major work is completed
7 other than some punchlist and warranty work required by Ramsey County.
8 The developer has requested a partial release of the PIC (Attachment A) for Lots 2, 3, 4, and
9 5, Block, 1, Twin Lakes 4th Additionto help finalize sale of these lots. The PIC would still
10 be tied to Lot 1 until all final work is completed, which is anticipated later this fall. The City
11 still has a $260,020.62 Letter of Credit to ensure the PIC work is finalized.
12 The City Attorney has reviewed the Release of Land from Public Improvement Contract.
13 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
14 All project costs related to the PIC were paid for by the developer. No further costs are
15 associated with the PIC. The City still has a $260,020.62 Letter of Credit to ensure the PIC
16 work is finalized.
17 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
rd
18 Staff recommends the City Council approve the partial release of land from the Twin Lakes 3
19 Addition Public Improvement Contract.
20 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
rd
21 Motion to approve partial release of land from the Twin Lakes 3 Addition Public Improvement
22 Contract.
Prepared by: Jesse Freihammer, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer
Attachments: A: Resolution
B: Release of Land from Public Improvement Contract
C: Public Improvement Contract
Page 1 of 1
Attachment A
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
th
2 of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 26 day of September,
3 2022, at 6:00 p.m.
4
5 The following members were present: and the following members were
6 absent: .
7
8 Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
9
10 RESOLUTION No.
11
RD
12 PARTIALRELEASE OF THE TWIN LAKES 3 ADDITION PUBLIC
13 IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
14
15 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, as follows:
16
17 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2020, the City Council approved the Public Improvement
18 Contract (PIC) with Roseville Investment Partners, LLC, for development work related to
19 Twin Lakes 3rd Addition development; and
20
21 WHEREAS, Roseville Investment Partners, LLC has requested a partial release of the
22 public improvement contract for certain lots; and
23
24 WHEREAS, the City of Roseville still holds a letter of credit and the PIC will still be
th
25 recorded against Lot 1, Block 1, Twin Lakes 4 Addition.
26
27 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
28 ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA, that the City partially releases the Public Improvement
th
29 Contract from Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, Twin Lakes 4 Addition;and
30
31 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
32 Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
33 favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: .
34
35 WHEAREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
rd
Partial Release of Public Improvements – Twin Lakes Station 3 Addition
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared
the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council
th
held on the 26
day of September, 2022, with the original thereof on file in my office.
th
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this the 26 day of September, 2022.
Patrick Trudgeon, CityManager
(SEAL)
Attachment B
(Top 3 inches reserved for recording data)
RELEASE OF LAND FROM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
DATE: September _________, 2022
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the real property in Ramsey County, Minnesota, legally described as follows:
th
Addition
Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block, 1, Twin Lakes 4
rdth
(note: Outlot A, Twin Lakes 3 Addition, was re-platted as Lots 1 -5, Block 1, Twin Lakes 4 Addition)
Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (Torrens)
is hereby released from that certain Public Improvement Contract dated July 15, 2020, executed by and between Roseville Investment
Partners LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and the City of Roseville, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and recorded
on July 29, 2020, as Document Number A04824572, in the Office of the County Recorder Registrar of Titles of Ramsey County,
Minnesota (the "PIC"). By releasing said Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, the undersigned does not release or relinquish its rights under the PIC with
th
respect to the remaining lot in the plat of Twin Lakes 4 Addition.
Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3 PARTIAL RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation
By:
Daniel J. Roe
(Seal)
Its: Mayor
By:
Patrick Trudgeon
Its: City Manager
Page 3 of 3 PARTIAL RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT
State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey
This instrument was acknowledged before me on September _______, 2022, by Daniel J. Roe and Patrick Trudgeon, the Mayor and City
Manager, respectively, of the City of Roseville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
(Stamp)
(signature of notarial officer)
Title (and Rank):
My commission expires:
(month/day/year)
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Barnes & Thornburg LLP (DJY)
225 South Sixth Street, Suite 2800
Minneapolis, MN 55402
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.: 10.f
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Order Feasibility Report for the County Road B Reconstruction Project
1 B ACKGROUND
2 Staff is requesting that the City Council order the preparation of a feasibility report for the
3 reconstruction of County Road B. In 2023, Ramsey County will be reconstructing County Road B
4 between Snelling Avenue and Lexington Avenue. The proposed plan is to replace the existing
5 concrete pavement with bituminous pavement. The lane configurations will generally remain the
6 same. Additionally, the County will be replacing the signals at Har Mar/Target entrance, Hamline
7 Avenue and Lexington Avenue. Some ADA improvements and sidewalk improvements will also be
8 done as part of the project. The City will be replacing watermain as part of this project between
9 Snelling Avenue and Hamline Avenue and between Dellwood Avenue and Merrill Street.
10 Funding for the project will be determined using Ramsey County’s cost participation policy. On
11 August 8, 2022, the City Council approved a resolution approving a Right of Way (ROW)
12 Agreement with Ramsey County for this project. The estimated cost to the City for its share of the
13 ROW was $343,964.00. The City of Roseville will be responsible for 100% of the water
14 improvements which is estimated to be $650,000. Some costs related to the curb and gutter, storm
15 sewer, and ADA upgrades for the improvement will be required to be paid by the City per Ramsey
16 County’s cost share agreement. This is currently estimated at $130,000. The City would use
17 Municipal State Aid (MSA) Funds for these costs. The other construction-related cost to the City is
18 the signal at the Har Mar/Target entrance. This cost is not eligible for MSA funds. This cost is
19 estimated to be $150,000 per Ramsey County’s cost share agreement. Per the City’s Assessment
20 policy, signal improvements that have private legs can be assessed. A formal agreement would be
21 entered into with the County for the construction-related costs at a later date.
22 Since assessments are proposed for the Har Mar/Target Signal, the Chapter 429 process needs to be
23 followed. The first step is to order a feasibility report and then to gather the applicable information
24 for this report. The feasibility report will identify how much of the improvements can be assessed.
25 A public hearing will be held and then the improvements can be ordered. City staff will plan to
26 complete this by March of 2023 before the County bids the project. The County is considering
27 delaying this project until 2024, potentially, so this timeframe could be extended.
28 The proposed schedule is as follows:
29 Authorize Feasibility Study – September 2022
30 Present Feasibility Study & Set Public Improvement Hearing – January 2023
31 Public Improvement Hearing/Order the Improvements/Authorize Plan & Specs – February
32 2023
33 Enter into Cooperative Agreement with Ramsey County –March 2023
34 County Open Bids – April 2023
Page 1 of 2
35 Project Construction –Summer 2023 or Summer 2024
36 Final Assessment Hearing –September 2023 or September 2024
37 P OLICY O BJECTIVE
38 It has been the City’s policy to manage and maintain the street infrastructure utilizing pavement
39 management policies which achieve the lowest overall cost to the City over time. This
40 reconstruction project is consistent with those goals.
41 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
42 It is proposed that the City’s portion of the cost of the project be financed with Municipal State Aid
43 funds, special assessments, and storm water utility funds where applicable. Final cost estimates and
44 breakdowns of funding will be determined and presented in the feasibility study. Current overall
45 City costs are estimated to be $1,273,964.00.
46 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
47 Staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility
48 report for the County Road B Reconstruction project.
49 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
50 Approve resolution authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report for the County Road B
51 Reconstruction project.
Prepared by: Jesse Freihammer, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer
Attachments: A: Resolution
B: Project Location Map
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
2of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 26th day of September,
32022, at 6:00 p.m.
4
5The following members were present: ; and and the following members were absent: .
6
7Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
8
9 RESOLUTION No.
10
11 RESOLUTIONORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT
12 FOR COUNTY ROAD BRECONSTRUCTIONPROJECT
13
14WHEREAS, County Road B between the Snelling Avenue and Lexington Avenue is a
15Ramsey County facility; and
16
17 WHEREAS, Ramsey County plans to reconstruct the roadway with new bituminous
18 pavement, spot curb repairs, storm sewer improvements, traffic signal upgrades, and other
19 necessary appurtenances; and
20
21 WHEREAS, the costs for the project will be split between Ramsey County and the City of
22 Roseville per Ramsey County’s Cost Participation Policy andas determined in a future
23 agreement; and
24
25 WHEREAS, the signal system at the entrance to Har-Mar Mall and Target are considered
26 private legs to a signal system; and
27
28 WHEREAS, according to the City’s assessment policy, private signal legs can be assessed;
29 and
30
31 WHEREAS, the City may assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the City’s cost
32 of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.011 to 429.111.
33
34NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville,
35Minnesota as follows:
36
37 1. The proposed improvements are referred to the City Engineer for study and he is
38 instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a
39preliminary way as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection
40 with some other improvements, and the estimated cost of the improvements as
41 recommended.
42
43 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member
44 and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the
45 following voted against the same:
46
47 WHEAREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Feasibility Report for County Road B Reconstruction Project
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the
attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on
the 26th day of September, 2022, with the original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 26th day of September, 2022.
Patrick Trudgeon, City Manager
(SEAL)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.: 10.g
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Order Feasibility Report for the Fairview Signal Project
1 B ACKGROUND
2 Staff is requesting that the City Council order the preparation of a feasibility report for the Fairview
3 Signal Project as part of the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s (MnDOT) TH 36/Fairview
4 Ramp Improvement project. In 2023, MnDOT will be modifying the ramps, and Fairview Avenue
5 between the TH 36 ramps, to provide better queueing and safety. Additionally, as part of the project,
6 Ramsey County will be replacing the signal to the entrance of Rosedale Mall and Rosedale Market
7 Place. Some ADA improvements and sidewalk improvements will also be done as part of the
8 project.
9 Funding for the project will be determined using MnDOT’s and Ramsey County’s cost participation
10 policies. The costs related to the TH 36 ramp signals is estimated to be $80,000 for the City. The
11 City would use Municipal State Aid (MSA) Funds for these costs. The other construction-related
12 cost to the City is the signal at the Rosedale Mall and Rosedale Market Place entrance. This cost is
13 not eligible for MSA funds. This cost is estimated to be $150,000 per Ramsey County’s cost share
14 agreement. Per the City’s Assessment policy, signal improvements that have private legs can be
15 assessed. A formal agreement would be entered into with MnDOT and Ramsey County for the
16 construction-related costs at a later date.
17 Since assessments are proposed for the Rosedale Mall and Rosedale Market Place Signal, the
18 Chapter 429 process needs to be followed. The first step is to order a feasibility report and then to
19 gather the applicable information for this report. The feasibility report will identify how much of the
20 improvements can be assessed. A public hearing will be held and then the improvements can be
21 ordered. City staff will plan to complete this by March of 2023 before MnDOT bids the project.
22 MnDOT is considering delaying this project until 2024 so this timeframe could be extended.
23 The proposed schedule is as follows:
24 Authorize Feasibility Study –September 2022
25 Present Feasibility Study & Set Public Improvement Hearing – January 2023
26 Public Improvement Hearing/Order the Improvements/Authorize Plan & Specs – February
27 2023
28 Enter into Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT and Ramsey County – March 2023
29 County Open Bids – April 2023
30 Project Construction – Summer 2023 or Summer 2024
31 Final Assessment Hearing – September 2023 or September 2024
Page 1 of 2
32 P OLICY O BJECTIVE
33 It has been the City’s policy to manage and maintain the street infrastructure utilizing pavement
34 management policies which achieve the lowest overall cost to the City over time. This
35 reconstruction project is consistent with those goals.
36 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
37 It is proposed that the City’s portion of the cost of the project be financed with Municipal State Aid
38 funds, special assessments, and storm water utility funds where applicable. Final cost estimates and
39 breakdowns of funding will be determined and presented in the feasibility study. Current overall
40 City costs are estimated to be $230,000.
41 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
42 Staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility
43 report for the Fairview Signal project.
44 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
45 Approve resolution authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report for the Fairview Signal project.
Prepared by: Jesse Freihammer, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer
Attachments: A: Resolution
B: Project Location Map
46
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
2of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 26th day of September,
32022, at 6:00 p.m.
4
5The following members were present: ; and and the following members were absent: .
6
7Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
8
9 RESOLUTION No.
10
11 RESOLUTIONORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT
12 FOR FAIRVIEW SIGNALPROJECT
13
14 WHEREAS, Fairview Avenue between the County Road B and County Road B2 is a Ramsey
15 County facility; and
16
17 WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and Ramsey County
18 plan to modify the roadway with new lane configurations, spot curb repairs, storm sewer
19 improvements, traffic signal upgrades, and other necessary appurtenances; and
20
21 WHEREAS, the costs for the project will be split between MnDOT, Ramsey County and the
22 City of Roseville per MnDOT’s and Ramsey County’s Cost Participation Policies and as
23 determined in a future agreement; and
24
25 WHEREAS, the signal system at the entrance to Rosedale Mall and Rosedale Marketplace
26 are considered private legs to a signal system; and
27
28 WHEREAS, according to the City’s assessment policy, private signal legs can be assessed;
29 and
30
31WHEREAS, the City may assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the City’s cost
32of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.011 to 429.111:
33
34NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville,
35Minnesota as follows:
36
37 1. The proposed improvements are referred to the City Engineer for study and he is
38 instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a
39preliminary way as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection
40with some other improvements, and the estimated cost of the improvements as
41recommended.
42
43The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member
44 and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the
45following voted against the same:
46
47WHEAREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Feasibility Reportfor Fairview Signal Project
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the
attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on
the 26th day of September, 2022, with the original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 26th day of September, 2022.
Patrick Trudgeon, City Manager
(SEAL)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: September 26, 2022
Item No.: 10.h
Department Approval City Manager Approval
Item Description: Approve Sanitary Sewer Easement and Encroachment Agreement at 2808
Lakeview Avenue
1 B ACKGROUND
2 The property owners at 2808 Lakeview Avenue applied for building permits to regrade their
3 backyard and install a pool. During the permit reviewit was discovered that the City never had a
4 recorded easement for the sanitary sewer, installed in the 1960’s, which runs in the back yard. The
5 proposed site improvements would be above the sanitary sewer pipe.
6 Staff met with the property owner to discuss the site and the impacts to the existing sewer. The
7 property owner is willing to grant the City a formal sewer easement (Attachment A) and enter into
8 an encroachment agreement (Attachment C) for the pool encroachment for the sewer. The design of
9 the pool is a fabric-lined pool that gets replaced every 7 years. The applicant indicated he went with
10 this design knowing the risk of the sewer main. The City’s sewer main is scheduled to be lined later
11 this fall and manhole access will still be maintained. The only sewer service in this encroachment is
12 the property owner’s which is a newer service. The site still has adequate cover for the sewer pipe.
13 Based on these factors, City staff can support the encroachment agreement. The encroachment
14 protects the City should we need to repair the pipe which would likely only be in the case of an
15 emergency. The City would not be responsible for any impacts to the pool should we need to dig up
16 the sewer pipe.
17 The City Attorney has drafted the Sanitary Sewer Easement and Encroachment Agreement. If
18 approved, both of these would be recorded against the property.
19 F INANCIAL I MPACTS
20 There are no costs to the City for these agreements.
21 S TAFF R ECOMMENDATION
22 Staff recommends the City Council approve the Sewer Easement and Encroachment Agreement at
23 2808 Lakeview Avenue.
24 R EQUESTED C OUNCIL A CTION
25 Motion to approve Sewer Easement and Encroachment Agreement at 2808 Lakeview Avenue.
Prepared by: Jesse Freihammer, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer
Attachments: A: Sewer Easement
B: Sewer Easement Exhibit
C: Encroachment Agreement
D: Encroachment Agreement Exhibit
Page 1 of 1
Attachment A
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE is made as of this ______ day of ________________, 2022, between
Lynn J. Bishop and Barbara J. Bishop, husband and wife(the “Grantors”), and the City of
Roseville, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”).
WITNESSETH:
Grantors are the owners of the following described real property located in Ramsey
County, Minnesota, to wit: see attached Exhibit A (the “Property”).
To document the existence of a public sanitary sewer pipe on the Property, the Grantors,
in consideration of One and no/100 Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant and convey unto the
City, and its successors and assigns, a permanent sanitary sewer easement, in gross, on, over,
across and through that portion of the Property that is legally described as follows: see attached
Exhibit B (the “Easement Area”).
The Easement Area is shown on Exhibit C.
The grant of the foregoing easement includes the right of the City, and its contractors,
agents, employees, and successors and assigns, to enter upon and use the Easement Area to
construct, reconstruct, inspect, operate, use, maintain, and repair a sanitary sewer line for the
1
benefit of the public; and to do all other acts and things which are reasonably necessary for or
incidental to the enjoyment of the easement rights granted herein.
The foregoing easement shall be binding upon the Grantors and their heirs, successors and
assigns, shall inure to the benefit of the City and its successors and assigns, and shall run with the
land.
The Grantors, for themselvesand their heirs, successors, and assigns, covenant with the
City, and its successors and assigns, that Grantors are the owners of the Easement Area and have
good right to grant and convey the easement given herein to the City.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the hereditaments and
appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, to the City, its successors and
assigns, forever.
(Signatures Follow)
2
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantors have caused this easement to be executed as
of the ____ day of ___________________________, 2022.
GRANTORS
Lynn J. Bishop
Barbara J. Bishop
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of
___________________, 2022, by Lynn J. Bishop and Barabara J. Bishop, husband and wife, as
the Grantors.
__________________________________________
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Erickson, Bell, Beckman & Quinn, P.A.
Attorneys at Law
1700 West Highway 36, Suite 110
Roseville, MN 55113
Telephone No.: (651) 223-4999
3
EXHIBIT A
Grantor’s Property
Legal Description
The East 360 feet of the West 370 feet of the following described parcel: Beginning at a point on
the West line of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 29, Range 23, 480 feet North of the Southwest comer
of said Government Lot 3; thence East Parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 3, 666
feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Owasso, thence Northeasterly along the shore line of said
Lake Owasso to a point 580 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 3, measured at
right angles to said South line of said Government Lot 3; thence West parallel to the South line of
said Government Lot 3, 830 feet more or less, to a point on the West line of said Government Lot
3, 580 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 3, thence South 100 feet to the
point of beginning, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
4
EXHIBIT B
Easement Area
Legal Description
The East 360 feet of the West 370 feet of the following described parcel: Beginning at a point on
the West line of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 29, Range 23, 480 feet North of the Southwest comer
of said Government Lot 3; thence East Parallel to the South line of said Government Lot 3, 666
feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Owasso, thence Northeasterly along the shore line of said
Lake Owasso to a point 580 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 3, measured at
right angles to said South line of said Government Lot 3; thence West parallel to the South line of
said Government Lot 3, 830 feet more or less, to a point on the West line of said Government Lot
3, 580 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 3, thence South 100 feet to the
point of beginning, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
5
EXHIBIT C
Utility Easement Figure
A drawingof the Easement Area isattached hereto.
6
Attachment C
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
THIS ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made this ____ day of
___________________, 2022, by and between Lynn J. Bishop and Barbara J. Bishop, husband
and wife (the “Owners”), and the City of Roseville, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the
“City”).
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the Owners are the ownersof real property located in Roseville, Minnesota,
legally described as follows, to wit: see attached Exhibit A(the “Owners’ Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City is the owner of a certain Sanitary Sewer Easement on Owners’
Property, of even date herewith, a portion of which easement lies within an area legally
described as follows, to wit: see attached Exhibit B (the “Easement Area”), and
WHEREAS, the Owners desire to construct and maintain a swimming pool encroaching
over a portion of the Easement Area as shown in Exhibit C attached hereto (the
“Improvements”) for the benefit of the Owners’ Property;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Owners shall have the right to construct, maintain and repair the
Improvements, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
2. The Improvements shall be constructed, maintained and repaired by the Owners at
the Owners’ sole cost and expense, holding the City free and clear of same. The Owners shall
maintain the Improvements in a neat, clean and safe condition.
3. The Owners shall be responsible for obtaining and paying for all permits,
variances, approvals, costs, fees and other expenses necessary to construct, maintain and repair
the Improvements. The Owners shall construct, maintain and repair the Improvements in
compliance with all laws, rules, regulations, codes and ordinances imposed by all governmental
authorities which have jurisdiction over the Easement Area.
4. The Owners hereby covenant and agree to release, indemnify, defend and hold the
City, and its mayor, council, officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and
all claims, losses, liabilities, demands, actions, judgments, damages, penalties, fines, costs and
expenses (including attorney’s fees incurred by the City) arising out of or related to: (a) the
construction, maintenance and repair of the Improvements; (b) the existence of the
Improvements on the Easement Area; (c) use of the Improvements and the Easement Area by the
Owners, their licensees, heirs, successors and assigns; and (d) any breach by the Owners of the
covenants and agreements in this Agreement.
5. In the event that the Improvements are substantially damaged or totally destroyed,
are removed from the Easement Area, or the Owners fail to comply with any of the Owners’
material obligations under this Agreement, the Owners shall remove any remaining portions of
the Improvements which are located within the Easement Area and the Owners’ right to
construct, maintain and repair the Improvements in the Easement Area shall terminate. The
Owners agree to complete such removal at their own cost and in accordance with all applicable
laws, codes and regulations pertaining thereto. In the event that the Improvements are not
removed,the City shall have the right, upon giving the Owners thirty (30) days prior written
notice, to remove the Improvements in which case the Owners shall be responsible for the costs
thereof. Any amounts due hereunder shall be fully paid within thirty (30) days following the
delivery of written demand therefor upon the Owners. If payment is not timely received, the City
shall have the right to assess the Owners’ Property for the costs over a five (5) year period with
interest.
6. The Owners hereby waive all rights they have by virtue of Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429 to a public hearing before the City Council, any appeal of the assessment in court or
otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of the assessment or the procedures used by the
City in levying the assessments, and hereby release the City, its mayor, councilmembers,
employees, agents, and contractors, from any and all liability related to or arising out of the
levying of any assessment amount.
6. The covenants and agreement contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the parties hereto, and their successors and assigns, and shall run with the land.
7. Except for the Owners’ right to construct, maintain and repair the Improvements
as provided herein, the City shall continue to have all of the rights and privileges which have
been granted to the City by the easement referenced above.
8. Any notice to be given by either party upon the other under this Agreement shall
be properly given if mailed to the other by United States registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed in the manner set forth below, or if given to a
nationally recognized, reputable overnight courier for overnight delivery to the other addressed
as follows:
If to the City: City of Roseville
Roseville City Hall
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Attn: City Manager
If to the Owners: To the Taxpayer Name and Address of Record per the
Ramsey County Tax Assessor’s Office
(Signatures Follow)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have signed this Agreement as of the
date set forth above.
OWNERS
Lynn J. Bishop
Barbara J. Bishop
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of
___________________, 2022, by Lynn J. Bishop and Barabara J. Bishop, husband and wife, as
the Owners.
__________________________________________
Notary Public
CITY
City of Roseville, a Minnesota municipal
corporation
By: ______________________________
Mayor
By: ______________________________
City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of
____________________, 2022, by ________________________ and ___________________
the Mayor and City Manager, respectfully, of the City of Roseville, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
_____________________________
Notary Public
This Document Was Drafted By:
Erickson, Bell, Beckman & Quinn, P.A.
Attorneys-at-Law
1700 West Highway 36
Suite 110
Roseville, MN 55113
Telephone: 651-223-4999
EXHIBIT A
Owners’ Property
Legal Description
The East 360 feet of the West 370 feet of the following described parcel: Beginning at a point on
the West line of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 29, Range 23, 480 feet North of the Southwest
comer of said Government Lot 3; thence East Parallel to the South line of said Government Lot
3, 666 feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Owasso, thence Northeasterly along the shore line
of said Lake Owasso to a point 580 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 3,
measured at right angles to said South line of said Government Lot 3; thence West parallel to the
South line of said Government Lot 3, 830 feet more or less, to a point on the West line of said
Government Lot 3, 580 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 3, thence
South 100 feet to the point of beginning, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
EXHIBIT B
Easement Area
Legal Description
The East 360 feet of the West 370 feet of the following described parcel: Beginning at a point on
the West line of Lot 3, Section 2, Township 29, Range 23, 480 feet North of the Southwest
comer of said Government Lot 3; thence East Parallel to the South line of said Government Lot
3, 666 feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Owasso, thence Northeasterly along the shore line
of said Lake Owasso to a point 580 feet North of the South line of said Government Lot 3,
measured at right angles to said South line of said Government Lot 3; thence West parallel to the
South line of said Government Lot 3, 830 feet more or less, to a point on the West line of said
Government Lot 3, 580 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 3, thence
South 100 feet to the point of beginning, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
EXHIBIT C
Improvement Plans