|
Attachment E
<br />113 Likeprevious budgets, most fundsare used for operational needsas depicted below:
<br />114
<br />Budget Funding Uses
<br />Princ & IntTotal
<br />FunctionOperationsCapitalon DebtUses
<br />Police$ 10,408,405$ 508,000 $ -$ 10,916,405
<br />Fire 4,030,839 221,300 642,904 4,895,043
<br />Parks & Recreation 6,173,500 1,995,500 1,570,811 9,739,811
<br />Public Works 3,612,348 3,681,305 - 7,293,653
<br />Administrative Services 3,783,163 450,400 - 4,233,563
<br />Information Technology 857,141 49,400 - 906,541
<br />General Facilities - 1,268,400 - 1,268,400
<br />Water, Sewer, Storm 13,512,984 4,572,000 - 18,084,984
<br />Other 6,049,540 2,300 - 6,051,840
<br />Total$ 48,427,920$ 12,748,605$ 2,213,715$ 63,390,240
<br />** Other Funding Uses Include: license center, planning & inspections, TIF and others
<br />115
<br />116 Figure 5
<br />117
<br />118 City Manager 2023Budget Strategies
<br />119
<br />120 My approach tothe 2023 budget is centered onthree main strategies.
<br />121
<br />122 1) Investment in infrastructure
<br />123 2) Investment to maintain city programs and workforce
<br />124 3) Strategic use of financialreserves and grant funding
<br />125 As a result of these priorities, I am proposing a total property tax levy increase of $1,741,210; a
<br />126 7% levy increase over 2022. The median-valued Roseville home increased in value from
<br />127 $296,500 to $335,400 or an estimated 13.2%value increase over last year. This increase results in
<br />128 a levy increase of approximately $86 from last year ($7.18/month) for the median valued home.
<br />129
<br />130 The next two pages are a summary of the proposed 2023 City Manager Budget followed by
<br />131 detailed information about the specifics of my identified funding strategies.
<br />132
<br />
<br />
|