Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 24, 2022 <br />Page 7 <br />268 <br />269 <br />270 <br />271 <br />272 <br />273 <br />274 <br />275 <br />276 <br />277 <br />278 <br />279 <br />280 <br />281 <br />282 <br />283 <br />284 <br />285 <br />286 <br />287 <br />288 <br />289 <br />290 <br />291 <br />292 <br />293 <br />294 <br />295 <br />296 <br />297 <br />298 <br />299 b.Discussion of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Products Regulations <br />300 City Manager Trudgeon briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the Request for <br />301 Council Action and related attachments dated October 24, 2022. <br />302 <br />303 Councilmember Strahan asked if Mr. Trudgeon could illuminate the Council on the <br />304 wide range of licensing feesfrom other cities, is really a preventative measure in <br />305 the case of $10,700 and a $500 background fee when the City is charging a licens- <br />306 ing fee of $250 for tobacco. <br />307 <br />308 Mr. Trudgeon explained he did not know the specific reasons but he could assume <br />309 that since thoselicense fees are the same as a liquor license given that THC products <br />310 are intoxicating, their approach may have been that it is a similar like process and <br />311 potential issues surrounding that so they would charge a license fee. He thought <br />312 that staff’s philosophy has always been to make sure that the license fee is always <br /> <br />