Laserfiche WebLink
RCA Attachment E <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />1 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />2 Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 28th day of November 2022 at 6:00 p.m. <br />3 The following Council Members were present: _________; <br />4 and _____ were absent. <br />5 Council Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />6 RESOLUTION NO. ___ <br />7 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED ÒWHEATON WOODS 2ND ADDITIONÓ <br />8 PLAT (PF22-011) <br />9 WHEREAS Civil Site Group has submitted a valid application for approval of the proposed <br />nd <br />10 Wheaton Woods 2 Addition plat on behalf of Golden Valley Land Company, owner of the property <br />11 described as Outlot A, Wheaton Woods, and Paul Houck, owner of 2687 Dale Street; and <br />12 WHEREAS the proposed subdivision conforms to all of the applicable standards of the City of <br />13 Roseville zoning and subdivision codes except that the width of the proposed Lot 1 is narrower than the <br />14 minimum required width established in §1004.09 of the City Code; and <br />15 WHEREAS the Roseville City Council held the duly noticed public hearing for this application <br />16 on November 28, 2022; <br />17 WHEREAS the Roseville City has made the following findings pertaining to the nonconforming <br />18 length of the cul-de-sac street pursuant to §1102.02.C of the City Code, which mandates that the City <br />19 make four specific findings as a prerequisite for approving a subdivision variance: <br />20 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is generally consistent with <br />21 the Comprehensive Plan because it represents the Comprehensive PlanÓs goals of providing a variety <br />22 of low density housing options in the community. <br />23 2. The proposal is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning and subdivision ordinances. <br />24 The basic purposes and intent of the zoning and subdivision ordinances as they apply to this situation <br />25 are to ensure new lots have enough space for new residential development and intuitively simply <br />26 boundaries. The proposal is in harmony with these purposes of the zoning and subdivision <br />27 ordinances because the new boundary between Lot 1 and Lot 2 would be straight and orthogonal to <br />28 the Wheaton Avenue right-of-way while providing a building pad for a new home on Lot 1 that is no <br />29 different than if Lot 2 was made to conform technically to the minimum required lot width at the <br />30 front setback line and narrowed to enable the existing garage on Lot 2 to meet the minimum setback <br />31 from its new rear boundary. <br />32 3. An unusual hardship on the land exists. Requiring the existing garage on Lot 2 to be removed to <br />33 enable Lot 1 to meet the 85-foot minimum width requirement and have a straight eastern boundary <br />34 will increase the cost of the naturally occurring affordable home at 2687 Dale Street. This obstacle to <br />35 designing Lot 1 to achieve the minimum width standard while using a straight boundary and <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />