My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01092023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 01092023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2023 12:32:12 PM
Creation date
1/9/2023 12:31:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/9/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
37 2) City License and Passport Center at a cost of $12,7000 <br />38 <br />39 Last year, the City also requested sales tax funding for a pedestrian Bridge over Hwy. 36 west of <br />40 Snelling Ave. The pedestrian bridge has been dropped as part of this request due to the higher costs <br />41 for the Maintenance Facility and License Center. <br />42 <br />43 To fund these project improvements as well as the debt issuance and interest costs, staff is proposing <br />44 the Cityrequest the Legislature approve a 0.5% local option sales tax subject to approval by voter <br />45 referendum approval for a period of 20 years in Roseville. According the Minnesota Department of <br />46 Revenue, it is estimated that a 0.5% sales tax in Roseville will generate $5.4 million annually based <br />47 on 2019 sales figures. Over 20 years, the sales tax will raise an estimated $108 million dollars which <br />48 will be sufficient to cover all of the two projects and debt issuance and interest costs. If the project <br />49 costs come in lower and/or sale tax revenue exceeds our projections, the debt and sale tax authority <br />50 will expire earlier. <br />51 For the City Council’s information, Attachment A shows a listing of the local sales tax rates within <br />52 the Twin Cities metro area and selected cities in Minnesota. <br />53 <br />54 Staff has included a draft resolution (Attachment B) based off of the League of Minnesota Cities <br />55 model resolution that has been updated with the current projects and the amount of sales tax <br />56 proposed to be collected. Attachment C contains documentation of regional significance for each <br />57 project that the City is proposing to be funded via the sales tax. This documentation will be included <br />58 with the resolution sent to Legislators. <br />59 P OLICY O BJECTIVE <br />60 The creation of a local sales tax for Roseville will more closely distribute the cost borne by Roseville <br />61 taxpayers for regional transportation infrastructure supporting Roseville’s business community. <br />62 B UDGET I MPLICATIONS <br />63 Not directly applicable at this time. Approval of a local sales tax will lead to additional dollars being <br />64 available for city capital projects. <br />65 R ACIAL E QUITY I MPACT S UMMARY <br />66 A sales tax is generally considered one of the most regressive taxes, meaning that people of lower <br />67 incomes pay a larger percentage of their income for sales taxes. The Institute on Taxation and <br />68 Economic Policy’s report “Taxes and Racial Equity – An Overview of State and Local Policy <br />69 Impacts” states the following regarding the impact of sales taxes: <br />70 <br />71 Consumption taxes, most notably general sales taxes, are the most regressive type of taxes <br />72 relied on by state and local governments and the most significant drivers of racial inequity in <br />73 state and local tax codes. Low- and middle-income families pay a larger share of their <br />74 incomes in consumption taxes than the rich. While most low-income taxpayers are white <br />75 because they remain a majority of the U.S. population, a disproportionate share of Black, <br />76 Hispanic, Indigenous and other households of color are in lower-income groups due to the <br />77 legacy of racist public policies and ongoing discrimination. So, policies that disadvantage <br />78 low-income individuals and families—like heavy reliance on sales and excise taxes—have a <br />79 disproportionately negative effect on people of color. <br />80 <br />81 The Executive Summary of the report is included as Attachment C. <br />82 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.