CC_Minutes_2022_1128 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,November 28, 2022 Page 12 Councilmember Etten understood the concern from neighbors that the additional units are a big change to the neighborhood, but this meets or beats all the require- ments, whether it is the parking, setbacks, whether it is the amount of pervious versus impervious surface, it meets or beats all the City's requirements so he did not know how he could vote against it. Councilmember Strahan indicated she would like to see the forty percent reflected because that is where her concern is. She did not see how, other than the setback from County Road B,there is any space that is green. She thought with one hundred fourteen bedrooms there is going to be a lot of potential people who need some green space on this, and she is not seeing it. Councilmember Willmus explained the Council is looking at the Conditional Use aspect of this and the consideration if it goes above and beyond Code with the Con- ditional Use. With that Conditional Use, several factors can come into play, cer- tainly taking into context concerns that were raised by neighbors, concerns that are potentially raised by staff long term, concerns with respect to the City's infrastruc- ture and ability to provide services when there is significant adding to some of these developments, which gives him pause. On the other side, there are factors that certainly would tie into some of the things the City is trying to do. He thought there was a middle ground and an opportunity for this property to develop more in line with the general guidance of HDR Zoning requirements and the number of units that come along with that. When they look significantly to ramp that up at a total of eighty-six units, from his perspective, that impact in the surrounding areas in- creasing a little bit beyond his comfort level so he did not know that he would support the motion. Councilmember Groff understood the concerns of the neighbors and that adding that much traffic will have an impact and is going to affect the street going out to Hamline. It is going to affect the light on the east side of the property as well. He indicated he has concerns;however, they must get back to the Conditional Use and it does meet the requirements that are required so he would be supporting the mo- tion. Mayor Roe agreed with Councilmember Strahan on her comment that the City does not own the property and believed,given the market value,it would be a significant challenge for the City to acquire for park purposes. Certainly, when the original use for that property was torn down,the intention all along was for it to be redevel- oped. It certainly has been nice for the neighborhood to have that open space during that time. It is not a question of approve the Conditional Use or acquire for a park, as that is not what is before the Council tonight. He thought there was also poten- tially some concern in the area of making decisions related to land use applications that might have the appearance of the City trying to force a park onto the site and is certainly not what the Council is trying to do here. He noted that the bonus is a part of City Code and available for developers to use, if the development meets the