CCP 01302023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ATTACHMENT F Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, June 1, 2022 Page 6 Mr. Paschke indicated if would be a condition of the approved variance that they provide vegetation cover and does not preclude them of having access to the lake, having a dock or other things. Ma. Trapp explained they did specifically state “restore”, which has a cost implication versus just leaving it natural. Chair Kimble indicated for the developer that is one thing, for a single family trying to get a variance for a simple thing on their single-family lot, that is her concern. She explained she was not against the idea of it and she understood the purpose of it but she was concerned what the City was doing to ordinary people that want to do something and now have this thing that they do not understand and have a cost implication. She indicated she does have a concern. The Commission and staff discussed the implications regarding Section 3. Ms. Trapp asked if there were any concerns with Section 4.0, Shoreland Classification and Land Uses or with Section 5.0, Special Lane Use Provisions. The Commission did not have any concerns. Ms. Trapp indicated Section 6.0, Dimensional and General Performance Standards might need some discussion and clarification. She asked the Commission if there were any concerns or changes for the riparian lots. The Commission indicated they would support following the model ordinance and providing more protection. Ms. Trapp explained staff thought the underlying Zoning District should be used for the non-riparian lots which will reduce the impact of that extension to a thousand feet and will make it easier for all of the people who do not realize that they are in a shoreland district anyway. The Commission agreed. Ms. Trapp asked if there were any questions about the special residential lot provisions for attached, courtyard cottage and multifamily housing and wondered if it made sense as a strategy to try to move the City in the direction to have some standards that people would follow. The Commission did not have any additional concerns. Ms. Trapp asked if there were any questions in Section 7.0, Performance Standards for Public and Private Facilities. Member McGehee thought in Section 7.11 there might be an easy place for a loophole. It did not seem quite nailed down.