Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT F <br />Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, September 7, 2022 <br />Page 9 <br />Ms. Gundlach explained staff talked about this a little this morning and she <br />thought it might be appropriate to pull out the requirement under the handicapped <br />stall because her concerns all along have been that she did not want the State <br />Building Official to tell them that they are implementing a requirement that is <br />more restrictive than the Building Code and the accessibility requirements are in <br />the Building Code so if they have those on the accessibility stalls that could be a <br />red flag. If and when the change comes into place where the Building Code will <br />require those accessible stall to have it that would not be a concern. She noted <br />staff can work on this. <br />Mr. Miller continued the presentation on Landscaping and Screening Ordinance. <br />Member Pribyl indicated she had a question on the landscaping that was not <br />presented on the slide but was in the handout, in paragraph six regarding mixed <br />use building or development, it states each use shall be calculated separately to <br />determine minimum landscape requirements. She found this confusing because <br />these are two different kinds of definitions and wondered if that meant they would <br />add the requirement if they felt the mixed-use building of residential and <br />commercial that there would be one canopy and one evergreen per two thousand <br />plus what would be required for commercial or is it whichever is more restrictive. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller indicated that is not a change. <br /> <br />Mr. Lloyd explained it would be a pro-rated thing. If a certain amount of the <br />building is commercial type uses and a certain amount of the building is <br />residential type uses then the landscaping would be divided by that pro-rated <br />amount. <br /> <br />Member Pribyl indicated these are defined differently now so there is one defined <br />based on the open space and one that is defined based on the gross building area <br />or the linear feet of site parameter. <br /> <br />Chair Kimble thought if there were vertical mixed use then it could get sticky and <br />be excessive. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke indicated that is what the variance process might be for and how it <br />would be done now. <br /> <br />Member McGehee asked if it would be possible to include anything to encourage <br />the use of drought tolerant native plants and pollinators and they offer the ability <br />to reduce the amount of irrigation necessary. <br /> <br />Ms. Gundlach thought that was a component of the incentives conversation that <br />will be next. <br /> <br /> <br />