My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01302023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 01302023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 10:26:46 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 10:26:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/30/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />47 Chair Davies thought the loan could just sit there and paying off the loan could be a part of the <br />48 expansion. She asked Ms. Pietrick what she recommends because the staff report indicates staff <br />49 would recommend any of the alternatives other than the do-nothing option, option four. <br />50 <br />51 Ms. Pietrick explained she would be fine with doing nothing but would not recommend option <br />52 three, increasing taxes to repay it. It has been sitting there for four years and the PMP Fund will <br />53 not run out of funds for approximately ten years. She reviewed the various options with the <br />54 Commission. <br />55 <br />56 Commissioner Murray agreed that nothing should be done until it is clear what is going to <br />57 happen across the road. It seems it would be a part of the cost of the whole project. <br />58 <br />59 Commissioner Bester explained he would be ok with either recommendation one, two or four, <br />60 with four being his first preference. <br />61 <br />62 Ms. Pietrick indicated she thought the City could go with recommendation four and see where <br />63 the project goes. Right now, Pavement Management is healthy and will not run out of cash and if <br />64 she has some freed-up resources that she can invest, this was the fund she was looking at <br />65 investing for. <br />66 <br />67 Chair Davies asked if the Commission needed to make a motion to do nothing on this item. <br />68 <br />69 Commissioner Murray thought this item could go on the Tracking report and bring it up again in <br />70 six months to see where it is standing. <br />71 <br />72 Ms. Pietrick thought that was a good idea because that will give the Commission a chance to <br />73 look at the CIP sheets and go through the budget process as well. <br />74 <br />75 Finance Commission ÎExcerpt of May 10, 2022 Minutes <br />76 Discuss Internal Loan Balance <br />77 <br />78 Finance Director Pietrick explained in 2018 the City purchased the shopping center at 2719 <br />79 Lexington Avenue. To accomplish this purchase, $1.5 million of funds were loaned from the <br />80 Pavement Management (PMP) fund and a receivable was recorded. The sale of the former fire <br />81 station on Fairview was seen as a way to repay this loan, hence the interfund loan receivable and <br />82 payable were recorded. The former fire station was sold and $1,233,171.30 was received on <br />83 February 28, 2022 and the internal loan has been reduced to a remaining balance of $266,828.70. <br />84 <br />85 Ms. Pietrick reviewed the information with the Commission and instructed the Commission to <br />86 discuss alternatives for addressing the remaining interfund loan balance. She noted staff would <br />87 recommend either using the Excess Cash Reserve fund or the General Fund reserves to repay the <br />88 PMP fund. Staff is also willing to leave the receivable sit in the PMP fund until the fund needs <br />89 the cash. <br />90 <br />91 Chair Davies did not see any reason why not to clean it up. She asked if there was a reason to <br />92 leave it there. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.