My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 03062023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 03062023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2023 2:19:11 PM
Creation date
3/3/2023 2:18:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/6/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment D <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 30, 2023 <br />Page 5 <br />Councilmember Etten appreciated the approach to this and that it was going in the <br />right direction. He thought there was a lot of good in what can come here. One of <br />the things he was worrying about is that some of the pieces are more valuable to <br />developers, noting the Council had specific detailed discussion on things such as <br />building height, for example. Tonight there was discussion about impervious sur- <br />face and these are all pushing out and impact a development that will impact people <br />around them and green space so it is almost in direct contrast to environmental goals <br />or some of the things the City has tried to do to preserve neighborhood situations. <br />He wondered about how the pieces are looked at, how staff will weigh these things, <br />and also how it will work with other parts of the development code. <br />Ms. Gundlach explained the simple answer is what does the City value as a com- <br />munity and how much incentive does the City want to offer in order to get sustain- <br />able development. She noted that right now, staff cannot require these things and <br />there has been a lot of pressure and demand by certain groups within the community <br />that the City should be doing more sustainable developments, and if the City cannot <br />legally do it then it needs to be incentivized. <br />Mayor Roe wondered if this should be rolled out as a pilot program or available to <br />everyone. He felt it was safer to do a pilot program rather than open it up to every- <br />one because he has some concern about how this will work. <br />Councilmember Schroeder thought a pilot program would be best because she was <br />also concerned there is so much to this. A pilot program would be easier to roll out <br />because the City would want to monitor and measure each project to see if it is <br />working or not. <br />Ms. Gundlach reviewed staff recommendations and indicated the recommendations <br />will be implemented and brought back to the City Council in March for further <br />discussion. She noted the incentives will be reviewed further and taken out of the <br />Zoning Code update at this point to work on the possibility of a pilot program. <br />Mayor Roe thanked HKGi for the presentations. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.