My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02132023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 02132023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2023 2:29:18 PM
Creation date
3/3/2023 2:28:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/13/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date:February 13, 2023 <br />Item No.: 7.d <br />Department ApprovalCity Manager Approval <br />Item Description:Presumptive Penalty Approval –2022 AlcoholCompliance Checks, <br />Speedway <br />1 B ACKGROUND <br />2 In 2022, all businesses with a city liquor license were mailed a letter announcing two citywide <br />3 alcohol compliance checks to be conducted before the end of the calendar year(Attachment A). The <br />4 letter included information on the Roseville City Ordinance regarding the mandatory liquor licensee <br />5 training program and penalties for noncompliance. A copy of the letter was also e-mailed to all <br />6 license holders.The following is related to the second round of alcohol compliance checks, which <br />7 occurred in December of 2022. <br />8 OnSaturday, December 17, 2022, a19-year-old underage compliance checker, entered <br />9 establishments holding a liquor license in the city of Roseville, Minnesota, to conduct compliance <br />10 checks. Upon conclusion of the checks, multiple businesses failed (Attachment B). <br />11 Speedway (CN 22036927) -The underage checker ordered a pack of Swisher Sweet Cigarsand a <br />12 six pack of Michelob Ultra. The employee then telephoned a manager and received information on <br />13 how to unlock the secured alcohol cabinet. After locating the key, the employee retrieved the beer. <br />14 Without asking for identification or inquiring as to the checkers age, the employee sold the checker <br />15 the cigars and beer. To date, the employee has not paid the administrative fine. <br />16 Officersmet with thebusiness in-person and advised them of theRoseville City Councilhearing <br />17 date. This notification was also provided in writing (Attachment C). <br />18 P OLICY O BJECTIVE <br />19 The Roseville Police Department seeks Council approval to issue and administer the presumptive <br />20 penalty pursuant to City Code Section 302.15, for off-sale liquorlicenseholders for the first <br />Page 1of 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.