CCP 02272023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A Mr. Pieper agreed that is what it appeared to be, but he thought if he received the City 80 81 blessings it could be pursued in a little deeper context. He explained they would get the 82 elevations exactly the way they should be and make sure it is correct. 83 Member Pribyl wondered if the existing wetland could be utilized in lieu of building a 84 new pond or expand the existing wetland and potentially in that way provide an amenity 85 for some of the residential uses that are nearbyand also make the parking closer to the 86 destination. 87 Mr. Pieper indicated they can work on that. He noted this is just a preliminary plan and 88 nothing is etched in stone in terms of the architectural where it has to be exactly as 89 shown. 90 Member Aspnes askedregarding the van parking. It appears to be a secure parking lot 91 with controlled access. There was mention that there is already parking within the 92 building for vans. She wondered how many vans Mr. Pieper saw being outside in this lot. 93 Mr. Pieper indicated there is van parking in the building and there will be no vans in this 94 parking lot. This is strictly personal vehicle parking. Right now, there are fifty-one 95 delivery vans. 96 Member Aspnes understood and indicated the parking closest to the building is 97 considered employee parking, on the east end and then there is a second parking lot on 98 the west side that shows van parking of fifty-three spaces with controlled access. If the 99 vans are all parked within the building, then what is the purpose of the van parking lot. 100 Mr. Pieper explained the controlled parking is on the south end of the building. That is 101 where the semi/vans come in and that is fenced and gated. It is secure and no one can get 102 into that area without going through the security. He did not think that is the correct plan 103 if it has fifty-three parking spots for vans. He indicated there was two sketches on this. 104 The first one had vans but that is not what is going to be there, it was all for employee 105 parking. 106 Mr. Anderson explained the plan he has had the van parking and employee parking with 107 those two sites. He noted Mr. Pieper has talked to the controllers at Fed Ex more recently 108 than he has so maybe this is just for employee parking now. 109 Mr. Pieper explained there will not be van parking there, that is Fed Ex’s latest proposal 110 per say. The reason being is the van parking, semi’s that are coming in, has to be a 111 secured location and nobody can get access to it because there could be packages in the 112 van that are left overnight so it would have to be in a secured location. He reviewed Fed 113 Ex business model. 114 Vice Chair Pribyl asked if the wrong plan was included in the packet how would that 115 affect the Commission’s discussion. 116 Mr. Paschke thought the Commission would want the appropriate plan in order to make a 117 recommendation. He recommended tabling this item until the February meeting and in 118 that timeframe, staff can get the correct appropriate plan and probably some additional 119 details. 120