My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 03202023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 03202023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2023 12:29:32 PM
Creation date
3/21/2023 12:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/20/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Victoria Street Roadway & Trail Conceptual Design Study | Study Report - DRAFT | PAGE 19 <br /> <br />Figure 15: Separated Bike Lanes (Option 2) <br /> Source: This graphic was created using Streetmix and the content is licensed under Creative Commons. https://streetmix.net/ <br />Evaluation Process Overview <br />An evaluation process was developed to screen the preliminary cross section concepts and the full study <br />area concepts. The evaluation of cross sections included both a “fatal flaw” analysis as well as a more in- <br />depth screening. Following the cross section screening, full concepts were evaluated based on their <br />ability to meet project needs and minimize social, economic and environmental impacts. <br />Cross Section Screening <br />The preliminary cross sections were first analyzed at a high level based on “fatal flaws,” or characteristics <br />that would cause them to not move forward in the process based on a high-level understanding of <br />potential benefits and impacts. All of the preliminary cross section concepts: <br />• Would improve safety for people walking and biking along Victoria Street. <br />• Would meet State Aid design Standards (required due to Victoria Street’s status as a CSAH). <br />• Would not result in social, environmental or economic impacts that could not be avoided, <br />minimized or mitigated. <br />Next, the preliminary cross section concepts were evaluated based on the following criteria: <br />• The design avoids major permanent right of way impacts. <br />• The design is consistent with the context of the corridor. <br />• The design meets the needs of people of all abilities, consistent with County policy. <br />• Implementation of the design could be phased. <br />• If the implementation was phased, connections to the key destinations identified on the west side <br />of the corridor would be improved. <br />The results of the cross section screening are shown in Table 2.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.