My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023_0328_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2023
>
2023_0328_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2023 8:12:59 AM
Creation date
3/31/2023 8:11:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/28/2023
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 Chair Ficek thanked Mr. Freihammer for putting all the information in the report, <br />35 especially regarding Dale Street. He noted the County's website is not current so <br />36 the information in the report has been very helpful. He asked if there were specific <br />37 reasons for the watermain break. <br />38 <br />39 Mr. Freihammer explained all of the pipes that have broken this winter are ones <br />40 staff has flagged as in need of repair or replacement and it usually related to the <br />41 change in weather. <br />42 <br />43 5. City Code Updates: Title 8 <br />44 Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer reviewed the Title 8 City Code changes. <br />45 <br />46 Member Luongo asked in terms of the buffer, did that assume that any drainage <br />47 does not grade towards that buffer. <br />48 <br />49 Mr. Freihammer explained water can be graded towards the buffer. As apart of the <br />50 City's Stormwater Management Standards and the watershed's, it is required that <br />51 85 percent of that water for that developed lot to be treated first and it will need to <br />52 be directed toward some sort of best management practice, like a pond or rain <br />53 garden and then it can be discharged to the wetlands. It is not preventing the water <br />54 to be directed to the wetland, there can not be any building within that buffer and <br />55 the water needs to be treated before reaching the wetland. <br />56 <br />57 Chair Ficek thought these changes were good to help protect the water bodies in <br />58 Roseville. He thought these changes seemed like a good idea and was in favor of <br />59 the changes. <br />60 <br />61 The Commission concurred. <br />62 <br />63 Motion <br />64 Member Hodder moved, Member Cicha seconded, to recommend the City <br />65 Council to accept the changes to Title 8 in the City Code. <br />66 <br />67 Ayes:4 <br />68 Nays:0 <br />69 Motion carried. <br />70 <br />71 6. Pathways Project <br />72 Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer updated the Commission on the Pathways <br />73 Project. <br />74 <br />75 Chair Ficek asked for pathways or paths on both sides, would that be for arterials <br />76 only. <br />77 <br />78 Mr. Freihammer explained that was correct. It is written that ultimately, long term <br />79 on arterials, the preference is to get it on both sides. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Page 4 of 67 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.