Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />1 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />th <br />2 Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 10 day of April, 2023, at <br />3 6:00p.m. <br />4 The following members were present: ; and and the following members were absent: <br />5 Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />6 RESOLUTION NO. <br />7 APPROVING THE REVOCATION AND DESIGNATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE <br />8 AID (MSA) ROADS <br />9 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Roseville is the official governing body of the City <br />10 of Roseville; and <br />11 WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Roseville that revisions hereinafter <br />12 described shall be made to the City’s Municipal State Aid Streets system under the provisions of <br />13 Minnesota Laws. <br />14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />15 Minnesota: <br />16 1. That the roads described as follows be, and hereby are, revoked as Municipal State Aid Streets <br />17 of the City of Roseville subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the <br />18 State of Minnesota: <br />19 a.MSAS 228 –Oakcrest Avenue, from Fairview Avenue to W Snelling Service <br />20 Drive (0.50 existing miles) <br />21 2. That the roads described as follows be, and hereby are, designated as Municipal State Aid <br />22 Streets of the City of Roseville subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation <br />23 of the State of Minnesota: <br />24 a. MSAS 266 –W Snelling Service Drive, from Roselawn Avenue to County <br />25 Road B (0.50 new miles) <br />26 3. That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of <br />27 this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for the Commissioner’s consideration. <br />28 The motion was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the <br />29 following voted in favor thereof: ; and and the following voted against: <br />30 WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />